similar to: Can't shutdown/reboot Windows 10 guest if on lock screen

My setup is as follows: Host OS: Debian Wheezy amd64 stock kernel (3.2), virt-manager v0.9.1 Guest VMs: A bunch of Linux based servers - CentOS 6, Debian 6/7, Ubuntu 12.04 (all amd64 with stock kernel). All of them defined using virt-manager GUI interface. >From the virt-manager, I am able to shutdown/reboot the Debian and Ubuntu guest OSs but not the CentOS 6 guests. For the CentOS 6

I have a Centos 4.4 system (unpatched) that lets me log in via tty/console, but when the Gnone screen lock kicks in, my password is unable to unlock. I am absolutely certain I an typing the correct password. I had to Alt-F1 to log in that way, issue a sudo reboot, then logged back in, enabled the screen lock, typed my password again, and it would not unlock. What am I missing? Thanks.

Which Keyboard-Layout do you use ? Maybe that's the trick... Well, i use Germay Keyboard Layout, but when the Screen lock is coming up The "z" and "y" is swapped (qwertz vs. querty). Try logging in Using us-keyboard-Layout. Just my 2 cents... Regards Marc Rebischke ----- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht ----- Von: Scott Ehrlich <scott at MIT.EDU> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15.

hi guys I have just two guest after which libvirt looks and when I shutdown those guests: $ virsh shutdown $_dom that domain takes little time to power down, as expected one would say(~20sec) But! I reboot the hosts and I have in my: /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests : ON_SHUTDOWN=shutdown PARALLEL_SHUTDOWN=1 SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT=300 I see libvirtd service shut down takes minutes, a few good

hi guys I have just two guest after which libvirt looks and when I shutdown those guests: $ virsh shutdown $_dom that domain takes little time to power down, as expected one would say(~20sec) But! I reboot the hosts and I have in my: /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests : ON_SHUTDOWN=shutdown PARALLEL_SHUTDOWN=1 SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT=300 I see libvirtd service shut down takes minutes, a few good

On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba

On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >>>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact

On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny

On 11/06/19 16:44, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via

On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a

I would like to migrate some of my Samba 3.x domains to Samba 4. Part of the functionality of the current system is allowing some Windows XP Pro computers, which are not joined to the domain, access to some public shares on the Samba server. I tried using "map to guest = bad user" with Samba 4 - but it appears to be completely ignored and the Windows XP machine keeps on prompting

Hello, I am unable to do a graceful shutdown or reboot of SLES 10 SP4 virtual machines (Kernel version: 2.6.16.60-0.85.1-default) with virsh shutdown or virsh reboot commands. (e.g virsh shutdown "vmname" ). On issuing these commands there is no impact on the VM. Also unable to perform the shutdown or reboot operations from the menu options available on the console when accessing the

Hello all, I just notice the new feature in the latest version 4 release. Any one know how to do this ? I have tried lvextend the partition size in dom0, but domU doesn''t see the change. I also need to reboot to make domU reread the block size. Any idea? Best regards, Chao-Rui _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.0.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: squeeze The host runs (at the time of testing) a single linux-x86 domu (128MB, 1VCPU). When issuing a reboot, everything looks as expected: - domu is saved - xend is stopped - drbd stopped - lvms unmounted - md0..4 stopped and the message "rebooting now" appears, but nothing happens until "INFO: task xenwatch is

should have mentioned, apologies, suspend is the graceful shutdown of the guest I was thinking of. Guest is win2k8, why would it not suspend? On 22/10/14 10:58, lejeczek wrote: > hi everybody > > by an assumption I expected VM guests to be shut down/off > gracefully when the host is being powered down or > rebooted, but this does not seem to be the case so I wonder.. > Am I

hi everybody by an assumption I expected VM guests to be shut down/off gracefully when the host is being powered down or rebooted, but this does not seem to be the case so I wonder.. Am I missing some libvirt components/packages ? Or my assumption is incorrect and guests have to be shutdown manually? it's all SL 7 and guest are M$ regards P.

Hi, I'm trying to use OVMF to run EFI-partitioned Windows 8.0 virtualized on my laptop. The reason is to reuse the original HDD image intact without re-installation of any kind. I'm running fully updated CentOS 7.1 (1503). Virtualized storage subsystem is VirtIO if it matters. I'm almost OK with the notable exception of inability to reboot the VM. OVMF bootloader doesn't

Ok, trying to bypass the usual flames (I used CDE for years, then KDE until it got dumbed-down too much, and we all know how GNOME has turned out) ... I've decided to try out xfce on CentOS 7. I grabbed xfce from epel by installing the following via yum: epel-release @xfce So far it's pretty good, and is giving me the basic features I'm looking at without getting in my way.

Hi everyone, I'm forwarding this mail that I wrote to OpenVSwitch dev list because I think that you could maybe help me a little :-) What did you think about the patch to libvirt that I'm using?. At least, it worked for me :-) Thanks. Ernesto ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ernesto Domato <edomat at gmail.com> Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:09 PM Subject: OpenVSwitch

On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since >> then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and >> inheritance on the shares as