similar to: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?"

2018 Mar 30
2
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've
2018 Feb 16
1
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter >> rules >> at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >> nwfilter to >> the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've
2018 Mar 29
1
nwfilter multiple IPs
I'm trying to apply a nwfilter rule for two networks on the same guest interface, like so: ~ # virsh nwfilter-dumpxml 1081532-private-both <filter name='1081532-private-both' chain='root'> <uuid>16004b94-2b62-4568-9467-169908eb4040</uuid> <rule action='accept' direction='in' priority='500'> <ip
2016 Jan 11
3
Networking with qemu/kvm+libvirt
I have some questions regarding the way that networking is handled via qemu/kvm+libvirt -- my apologies in advance if this is not the proper mailing list for such a question. I am trying to determine how exactly I can manipulate traffic from a _guest's_ NIC using iptables on the _host_. On the host, there is a bridged virtual NIC that corresponds to the guest's NIC. That interface
2016 Feb 08
2
Re: Networking with qemu/kvm+libvirt
On 01/11/2016 3:05 pm, Laine Stump wrote: > On 01/11/2016 02:25 PM, Andre Goree wrote: >> >> I have some questions regarding the way that networking is handled via >> qemu/kvm+libvirt -- my apologies in advance if this is not the proper >> mailing list for such a question. >> >> >> I am trying to determine how exactly I can manipulate traffic from
2018 Apr 11
2
Possible to resize a Windows guest's disk while online?
I'm looking for a way to online resize a Windows disk -- i.e., be able to resize the disk without shutting down, rebooting, or detaching the disk. Is this at all possible? Or am I just barking up the wrong tree? I'm not finding a way to do this and even Amazon has a weird workaround, in which the user must write data to the newly resized-drive in order to recognize the new size
2018 Apr 02
0
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On 03/30/2018 04:29 PM, Andre Goree wrote: > On 2018/02/16 12:12 pm, Daniel P. Berrang? wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >>> I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply >>> nwfilter rules >>> at runtime?? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a >>> nwfilter to >>> the VM
2018 Mar 29
2
Using alias under disk in XML
I've been trying to follow the information found here [1] in order to provide an alias for RBD disks I'm defining, however it does not appear to be working and I wanted to see if I was doing something wrong. I define the alias like so (using 'virsh edit'): <disk type='file' device='disk'> <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'
2018 Feb 16
0
Re: Possible to edit/apply nwfilter at runtime?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:59:42AM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > I'm trying to determine if it's possible to edit/attach/apply nwfilter rules > at runtime? I.e., after a VM is already running, can I apply a nwfilter to > the VM and have it work without rebooting the machine? Thus far, I've not > come across a way to do so, but I thought I'd ask here before I chase my
2019 Nov 04
2
It takes long time to start kvm virtual machine with nwfilter in docker container.
1. It takes minutes to start the virtual machine when I add "filterref" to libvirt.xml and run command "virsh start vm1". It also takes minutes to destroy the virtual machine. <interface type="bridge"> <mac address="fa:16:3e:fa:f7:94"/> <target dev="tap69e948b0-bf"/> <source bridge="br02"/> <model
2013 May 13
1
Upgrade from 1.0.x to AsteriskNOW 3.0
Hello all. I was hoping someone out there might have some advice or suggestions regarding an upgrade from an archaic Asterisk version. I've been given the daunting task of upgrading a very old Asterisk-1.0.x install to a recent LTS version. I'll also need the install to have high-availability and failover support. From my research, it would appear that AsteriskNOW-3.0 might be my
2017 May 08
3
Re: nwfilter and address of network ip address
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:35:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 08:09:49PM -0400, Dan wrote: >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am running a webserver on the libvirt host and would like to add a >> > nwfilter such that a VM can access that
2014 Feb 03
2
libguestfs and zfs-fuse
I'm wondering whether or not anyone has tried to use guestmount on an image with a ZFS partition (MBR partition table). I can't seem to find much on the internet regarding it, but I do see hints that may lead me to a solution. I'm under the impression that libguestfs can use what ever is available to the kernel on the host -- in my case I have zfs-use installed and running. I
2014 Jan 29
2
Status of R/W UFS
Is r/w to a UFS partition using 'guestmount' still an impossibility? From everything I've found, it seems to be something that is not possible at the moment. I was just wondering if that has changed or if there are plans to change that? Here is the issue I'm experiencing: ~# guestmount --rw -a ${disk_path}/${disk_name} -m /dev/sda4 /tmp/freebsd-master libguestfs: error:
2017 May 07
3
Re: nwfilter and address of network ip address
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running a webserver on the libvirt host and would like to add a > nwfilter such that a VM can access that server. The corresponding iptables > rule would look like this: > > iptables --append INPUT --in-interface virbr0 --destination 192.168.122.1 > --protocol tcp --dport 80
2014 Feb 04
3
Re: libguestfs and zfs-fuse
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:14:09PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:29:37PM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: > > Ahhh, understood. I do have have an image I can provide that was > > installed onto and MBR layout (seemed the easiest for libguestfs to > > understand, GPT is preferred if libguestfs works well with it, but > > that's another matter
2020 Jan 10
5
[PATCH Fedora libguestfs] Don't depend on libvirt-daemon-kvm monolith.
libguestfs usually needs qemu. However it only requires an emulator for the same architecture, not for all architectures. libvirt-daemon-kvm pulls in qemu which pulls in emulators for all architectures, as well as a bunch of other stuff we don't need at all like network interface support and nwfilter. There are no Fedora TCG-only arches, so drop the conditional section. I also made support
2017 Jun 05
6
Isolate VMs' network
All, I'm trying to setup a network with some virtual machines, that can connect to each other and to the internet, but neither to the host nor to other VMs. Is there any preconfigured network filter or best-practice for this setup? Of course, I could setup iptables rules on the host, but I'd prefer libvirt to handle them. - Chris
2014 Feb 03
2
Re: libguestfs and zfs-fuse
On 02/03/2014 3:16 pm, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:12:28PM -0500, Andre Goree wrote: >> I'm wondering whether or not anyone has tried to use guestmount on >> an image with a ZFS partition (MBR partition table). I can't seem >> to find much on the internet regarding it, but I do see hints that >> may lead me to a solution. I'm
2020 Jan 10
2
[PATCH Fedora libguestfs v4] Don't depend on libvirt-daemon-kvm
Compared to v3 this suggests: +Suggests: qemu-block-curl +Suggests: qemu-block-gluster +Suggests: qemu-block-iscsi +Suggests: qemu-block-rbd +Suggests: qemu-block-ssh which I missed in an earlier email from danpb.