similar to: Virtualization Management Platforms

On 09/02/18 9:17 AM, TomK wrote: > Looking for something that's relatively simple to operate, install and > lightweight but with enough maturity to provide monitoring as well as > holistic views of the entire physical space etc. virt-manager will fall in simple and lightweight category. You can connect to multiple hypervisors via SSH from one single window. https://virt-manager.org

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.

Hello, I would like to submit two papers that use LLVM to the Related Publications section. Both papers focus on code isolation applied to perform piecewise compiler optimizations. The code isolation process is performed by CERE, an open source tool based on LLVM. The second paper is an extended version of the first one. 1) Piecewise Holistic Autotuning of Compiler and Runtime Parameters

Dear Mihail, I've added these two publications to the publications page. Please review it and let me know if I need to make any changes. In particular, if you have URLs to use for the papers, having those would be greatly appreciated. Regards, John Criswell On 11/28/17 12:05 PM, Mihail Popov via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to submit two papers that use LLVM

On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom > On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018

On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >> own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage >> in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying

Hi, On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: > On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my > own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage > in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying > to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. > >

On Thu, 2023-09-21 at 20:08 -0400, Kevin Korb via rsync wrote: > I have heard in the past that rsyncing an empty dir over a tree to > delete the tree is faster than an rm -rf but I can't say I have ever > benchmarked it to get any actual numbers. This **may** indeed be a myth (for a long time now) re-cited again and again and - could no longer be valid today - could apply only

On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: Hey Alex, With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: cluster.quorum-type: none cluster.server-quorum-type: none Thank you for that. Cheers, Tom > Hi, > > You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you > need to

On Jul 27, 2010, at 4:59 AM, Jochen Wilhelmy wrote: > >> Keeping it out of the mid-level optimizers is "by design". When we tackle this, we should do it right, by making the flags per-instruction. >> > But at least ist it planned for some time in the future? > then i can "survive" with a patch until then. As an open source project, we have little

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > Kyle Moffett wrote: >> Even in the 64-bit-integer on 32-bit-CPU case, you still end up with >> the lower 32-bits in a standard integer GPR, and it's trivial to just >> ignore the "upper" register. You also would not need to do any kind >> of bit-shift, so long as your inline

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:35 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 4/9/2018 2:45 AM, Alex K wrote: > Hey Alex, > > With two nodes, the setup works but both sides go down when one node is > missing. Still I set the below two params to none and that solved my issue: > > cluster.quorum-type: none > cluster.server-quorum-type: none > > yes this disables

Hello everybody, I installed eucalyptus on ubuntu10, basic configuration . Everything is ok untill I start the instances, the disk is being created but it terminates soon. Environment: NFS , KVM, ubuntu10 x64, Euca on 2 machines (wc sc cc clc on one machine, and nc on another). libvirtd (libvirt) 0.7.5 QEMU PC emulator version 0.12.3 (qemu-kvm-0.12.3), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard.

Hello, I run into a situation where I need to provide the library functions, such as sqrt() from <math.h> and rand() from <stdlib.h>, in the format of LLVM IR bitcode files. Then I can try to link the bitcode of my program against these library bitcode files to formulate a holistic bitcode file. However, these library functions are only available in object format. And the source

Hi, I have encountered problem running virsh as non-root user. I am using eucalyptus software on top of KVM, eucalyptus requires to run virsh as non-root user. I've found that people had similiar issue posted in the list, but I didn't find the solution. I've tried few things. 1) put user eucalyptus in the libvirt group. 2) even changed owner /var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock to

Hi, You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you need to disable quorum so as to be able to still use the volume when one of the nodes go down. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 09:02 TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > In a two node glusterfs setup, with one node down, can't use the second > node to mount the volume. I understand this is

Hello there, I?m not sure if this is the right mailing list, but I?d like to see if we can add Eucalyptus to the IaaS page here: http://libvirt.org/apps.html#iaas Please let me know what is required in order to add us? Thanks very much, *_________________________* *Eric Choi - *Product Marketing *Eucalyptus Systems* www.eucalyptus.com +1 508 348-9778 Follow us on Twitter

> As an open source project, we have little ability to force things to happen. It could be implemented next week or it might be 10 years from now, or never. All I can say is that I don't know of anyone planning to work on it. It dovetails with rounding mode support, so a holistic approach would be good. > All I want to know if it "is planned" or if it is wrong use and

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Christopher Jefferson < chris at bubblescope.net> wrote: > > 3) Optimize quickly or '-O1' > > - Attribute: quickopt (this would be a new attribute) > > - Goal: Perform basic optimizations to improve both performance and > simplicity of the code, but perform them *quickly*. > > This level is all about compile time, but in a