similar to: How to use virtio-gpu to output

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "How to use virtio-gpu to output"

2004 Mar 08
1
Am failing on making lagged residual after regression
Folks, I'm most confused in trying to do something that (I thought) out to be mainstream and straightforward R. :-) Could you please help? I am doing an ordinary linear regression. My goal is: After a regression, to make residuals, and make a new variable which is the lagged residuals (lagged by 1). I will use this variable in a 2nd stage regression (for an error-correcting model). This
2004 Apr 27
0
[OT] Re: p-values
Greg Tarpinian wrote: > I apologize if this question is not completely appropriate for this > list. > > I have been using SAS for a while and am now in the process of > learning some C and R as a part of my graduate studies. All of the > statistical packages I have used generally yield p-values as a > default output to standard procedures. > > This week I have been
2013 Oct 16
1
How to write an error to output
Dear R forum, The example below is just an indicative one and I have constructed it. My real life data and conditions are different. I have a data.frame as given below mydat = data.frame(A = c(19, 20, 19, 19, 19, 18, 16, 18, 19, 20), B = c(19, 20, 20, 19, 20, 18, 19, 18, 17, 16)) if (length(mydat$A) > 10) { stop("A has length more than 10") }else if (max(mydat$B) > 18) {
2016 Jun 28
2
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
On Jun 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Chandler Carruth via Openmp-dev <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I think I agree with Chris with 3.10 being the worst possible outcome. > > I'd be interested to understand why you or Chris thing 3.10 is the worst possible outcome. > > Chris has said it is because he thinks we'll never change the "3”, Yes, that is one reason.
2016 Jun 28
0
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Chandler Carruth via Openmp-dev > <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I think I agree with Chris with 3.10 being the worst possible outcome. > > > I'd be interested to understand why you or Chris thing 3.10 is the worst
2016 Jun 29
1
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
> On 2016-Jun-28, at 16:22, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On Jun 28, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Chandler Carruth via Openmp-dev >> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> I think I agree with Chris with
2004 Aug 04
3
[LLVMdev] Compiler Driver Decisions
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:38, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 01:17:24AM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > I'm not thrilled with llvm-gen because it has overtones of "code > > > generation" (which actually isn't far from the truth). But, it > > > conjures up the wrong kind of tool ..
2018 Mar 02
0
[RFC] llvm-mca: a static performance analysis tool
Hi Philip, On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Reading through this last night got be thinking about how to model control > flow. Given most of my source code tends to be very branchy, be limited to > straight line code is quite restrictive. The main thing is that it > requires a lot of hand simplification which can be rather
2018 Mar 20
0
[cfe-dev] When to use '-mcpu' versus '-march'
Hi Martin, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:18 PM Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote: > Thanks Eric, > > > > After the original reply to my query I had a good look at the GCC > documentation for these options, and what I discovered is that “there is no > consensus” in GCC. Basically, saying do what GCC does was a non-answer as > it clarified nothing.
2018 Mar 21
1
[cfe-dev] When to use '-mcpu' versus '-march'
Thanks very much Eric for taking the time to carefully explain this to me. So if I am the author of the backend for a new processor technology, or willing to modernise my existing implementation, you would recommend that the ‘-mcpu’ option is deprecated and probably best not used at all, or perhaps just as a synonym for ‘-march + -mtune’? The first part of the target triple guides the
2006 Aug 08
1
biometrics in samba 4
Hello Lads, I am not a programmer in any shape or form, so bare with me. Windows AD can support biometric devices, such as fingerprint logins, it actually stores the fingerprint in the database. Will it be possible to store this information in a Samba4 AD enviroment? Cheers, Adrian Sender.
2001 Mar 15
5
Whats all this Linux business anyway?
Alright lads, I'm Rick Masters and I know very little about networks, but for some mad reason I have been given the job of setting up a Linux File Server on an NT network. How the dickens does that work? Anyway I need as much help as you can be bothered to give me. And there is a free pizza in it for the guy who helps me get it working :-) You are all super and great fun (I'm sure).
2018 May 23
1
Autofile Junk for all users
On 2018-05-23 (08:17 MDT), Andr? Rodier <andre at rodier.me> wrote: > Use the default scripts, works well for me. > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Configuration#Visible_Default_Script > > The Dovecot wiki is really helpful, have a look on it ;-) Excellent, that's exactly what I want. Question from that page, my users are (almost) all virtual, so what
2018 Mar 20
2
[cfe-dev] When to use '-mcpu' versus '-march'
Thanks Eric, After the original reply to my query I had a good look at the GCC documentation for these options, and what I discovered is that “there is no consensus” in GCC. Basically, saying do what GCC does was a non-answer as it clarified nothing. X86 has deprecated ‘-mcpu’ in favour of ‘-mtune’, and it uses ‘-mtune’ to mean that the scheduling, etc. should be biased in favour of more
2006 Oct 31
0
6409296 cpu microstate accounting is innacurate owing to incorrect interrupt accounting
Author: jhaslam Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: d3829b51394c8f722802846515e729e8e7528562 Log message: 6409296 cpu microstate accounting is innacurate owing to incorrect interrupt accounting Files: update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/ml/interrupt.s update: usr/src/uts/i86pc/os/intr.c
2017 Dec 29
2
Using Intel Quick-Sync with GPU capable Intel CPUs
Rogue S.T asked about checking out graphics cards which brought the question to me... Is it possible to make Intel on-CPU GPU resources to Windows 10? (the box I'm working with has Xeon E5-2640v4 CPUs which should be QuickSync capable) What else do I have to do to take advantage of this? Just load the drivers? Thanks,  -Ben
2010 Jan 10
0
[Bug 1696] New: output an error message when an account is locked
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1696 Summary: output an error message when an account is locked Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 Dec 08
0
help for segmented package
Hi, I am trying to find m breakpoints of a linear regression model. I used the segmented package. It works fine for small number of predicators and breakpoints.(3 r.v. 3 points). However, my model has 14 variables it even would not work even for just one breakpoints!. The error message is always estimated breakpoints are out of range. Since my problem is time related problem. So I
2016 Dec 07
2
Debug Locations for Optimized Code
my 2c. the sanitizers rely on debug info to produce human-readable error messages, and I agree with Reid that it's unwise to have a parallel way of encoding the source locations. Well, we have something like this in the clang coverage already... Right? (I never particularly liked this design decision). But since the debug info is known to be unreliable it kind of made sense. Grrr. And since
1999 Oct 08
0
Fwd: Re: Continuing IRIX Samba problems.
>Date: Thu, 07 Oct 1999 14:56:13 -0700 >To: jerry@eng.auburn.edu >From: Eric Songer <esonger@lads.is.lmco.com> >Subject: Re: Continuing IRIX Samba problems. > >At 11:40 AM 10/7/99 -0500, you wrote: > >>Seems that way. Is the WINS server you samba box or >>another server? > > My WINS server is a WinNT 4 Server that basically does domain logins,