similar to: About libvirt concurrency

Is there a convenient way to limit the number of call files (outgoing directory) that are processed concurrently? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3234 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090226/a46e68fa/attachment.bin

Hello all, Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of 'parallel_for_each' and Windows Concurrency Library. We have found that when compiling in Visual Studio 2015 and 2017 with /MTd, the use of 'concurrency::parallel_for_each' can cause unhandled exceptions when the program is exiting. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34976 After having some difficulty clarifying this

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been trying to understand the use of undef in both sequential > and concurrent programs. > > >From the LLVM Language Reference Manual, I see the following > definition of undef. > "Undef can be used anywhere a constant is expected, and indicates

Thank you so much for tracking down such a tricky issue. I agree that we should disable it. Should we just delete the ifdefs? We could in theory disable it just for debug builds, but that could create some hard to reproduce bugs. Cheers, Rafael Owen Reynolds via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hello all, > > Last year I submitted a bug regarding the use of

Hi all, I have been trying to understand the use of undef in both sequential and concurrent programs. >From the LLVM Language Reference Manual, I see the following definition of undef. "Undef can be used anywhere a constant is expected, and indicates that the user of the value may receive an unspecified bit-pattern". LLVM Language Reference manual also demonstrates how optimizers

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte >>> <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte >> <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been trying to understand the use of undef in

http://dovecot.org/tmp/concurrency.c I'd want to know what results this program gives with different systems. Please test and reply (but don't bother if someone already replied with the same OS+result). I expect it to print: - SMP kernels: "page size cut" once in a while - UP (uniprocessor) kernels: Nothing - The most important thing is that it never prints "broken

Hi. I am reaching out to request information on the capabilities and potential limitations of Samba4 in relation to our Active Directory infrastructure. Given our organization?s extensive use of LDAP/LDAPS, we need specific details regarding: 1. *Maximum Object Capacity:* Is there a limit to the number of objects Samba4 can manage optimally? 2. *User and Device Limits:* Are

Hi, looking at the discussions about atomic operations, we could also (and perhaps we should) discuss how a concurrency-aware memory model for LLVM should look like. One could draw the analogy that the mapping between algorithm-level concurrent algorithms and the HW atomic operations is like compiling to a specific architecture. There are several optimizations possible that are directly

We are *days* away from the official 0.3.13 release, which will be followed quickly by 0.4 code named Enterprisey Edition 1.2. This latest pre-release update closes off the last of the annoying bugs, and adds one very nasty feature people should check out before we release. Read about Katanas below. ** This release doesn''t have win32 yet. That''ll be uploaded Monday. ** WHAT

Greetings, My chosen CentOS mirror has a limit of 5 max FTP connections per IP. A simple 'yum update' is hitting this limit and causing the whole update procedure to fail. Are there any settings to limit yum's FTP concurrency? Regards, Tom

When I click on the link I get not found on the server. I run on a 4 way and AIX has some pretty fancy concurrency so it would be interesting. But then I'm leaving this afternoon and won't be back until Monday..... -- ==== Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504 sdean at bard.edu voice:

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte >> <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have been trying to understand the use of undef in

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Santosh Nagarakatte > <santosh.nagarakatte at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been trying to understand the use of undef in both sequential >> and concurrent programs. >> >> >From the LLVM Language Reference Manual, I

Dear Members of Xapian Project, Sorry for troubling you this time. I am currently facing a challenge that I can not search and update Xapian "InMemoryDatabase" concurrently via 2 different threads although I have added the critical area mutex which allows only reading/writing at one single time. More specifically, along with the core dump, the error message was "double free or

Op 26-10-2024 om 17:28 schreef Gabriel via samba: > Hi. > > I am reaching out to request information on the capabilities and potential > limitations of Samba4 in relation to our Active Directory infrastructure. > Given our organization?s extensive use of LDAP/LDAPS, we need specific > details regarding: > > 1. > > *Maximum Object Capacity:* Is there a limit to

On Aug 22, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> LLVM Atomics and Concurrency guide also states the following >> "Note that speculative loads are allowed; a load which is part of a >> race returns undef, but does not have undefined behavior" >> >> If the speculative loads returns an undef and the returned value is >> used, then it results in an

Hi, We recently published another paper that leverages LLVM (through our SMACK software verifier and novel tool called Whoop), and this time we focus on detecting concurrency bugs in device drivers: http://soarlab.org/2015/08/ase2015-ddr/ You can find all the required info (PDF, title, abstract, etc.) at the above webpage. I would appreciate if you could add this paper to your list of

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On