similar to: can't establish more than 1000 connections with virsh

在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote: >> Hi: >> >> I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only >> can establish 1000 connections. >> >> If try more connections,prompt: >> >> "error: failed to connect to the hypervisor >>

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:51:40PM +0800, dw wrote: > 在 2017年05月25日 18:37, Daniel P. Berrange 写道: > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote: > > > Hi: > > > > > > I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only > > > can establish 1000 connections. > > > > > > If try more

Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! /etc/pam.d/common-session session required pam_limits.so /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max = 100000

Sure there is, Install debian, follow my howto and you will have success. Just, your using an .local domain, and thats a reserved name for apples mDNS (zeroconf) And should not be used. ( same for .lan ) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_Use_the_.local_Top-level_Domain_for_My_AD_DNS_Zone.3F So the info is good, thats not the problem, finding it, is. Can you post your /etc/hosts

RID solved my problem. But while reading docs I saw new things and I changed my smb.conf completely. I have read almost every parameter but i'm still not %100 sure. Can you do me a last favor? Please can you tell me do I have any problem with new smb.conf? Kernel: Linux 4.14.13-1-ARCH Filesystem: zfs-linux 0.7.5.4.14.13.1-1 Thank you so much for your help. --------------------- [global]

Hello there, I’ve configured my server for maximum 50000 open files. [root at scast1 ~]# ulimit -a ... open files (-n) 50000 ... max user processes (-u) 65535 While im doing the Load Test 1, my server only reaches ~1015 listeners. I’ve set this on etc/security/limits.conf : icecast hard nofile 50000 icecast soft nofile 60000 icecast soft nproc 65535 icecast

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:20:51PM +0800, dw wrote: > Hi: > > I'm trying to connect with libvirtd with virsh from a remote PC,but only > can establish 1000 connections. > > If try more connections,prompt: > > "error: failed to connect to the hypervisor > error: Failed to open file '/etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf': Too many open >

Dear list, We moved our dovecot installation to a new vm, and ever since there are problems logging in to our imap server during office hours. ( Evenings and weekends are fine. ) Both the new and the old machine are dovecot 2.2.13. Symptoms: Logging in via imap gives: . OK Pre-login capabilities listed, post-login capabilities have more. a login <loginname> <passwd> * OK Waiting for

Hello All, I have this problem starting Centos7.3 - the official name escapes me at the moment. I often install Centos7 Minimal, then X Window System, then Mate desktop. This last step gives me trouble, and I have to run # yum groupinstall mate --skip-broken output: skipped packages: NetworkManager-I2tp ldns libreswan unbound-libs xl2tpd I realise this is probably an issue for EPEL

I'm running Solaris 9 Sparc with Dovecot alpha 5 and using maildir format.. I noticed in the log file the following error: dovecot: Dec 20 15:54:18 Error: imap(xxxxxxxx): open(/export/home/xxxxxxxx/mail/.Sent Messages/cur/1135013649.002916.mbox:2,Sab) failed: Too many open files I called the guy and asked him what he was doing... synching his folders. It hung for a while but finally

Hello all, could anyone explain the exact meaning of parameter nproc? Why different values of nproc give so different critical values, i.e. meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=3) [1] 0.9984853 meanL2BB$computeCritval(0.05,nproc=1) [1] 0.4594827 The strucchange-package description gives "integer specifying for which number of processes Brownian motions should be simulated" - do I need

We have some ORACLE PGA problem and ORACLE document say we can serup lockmem(Max lock memory) to higher value. $ulimit -a time(cpu-seconds) unlimited file(blocks) unlimited coredump(blocks) 0 data(kbytes) unlimited stack(kbytes) 10240 lockedmem(kbytes) 3145728 memory(kbytes) unlimited nofiles(descriptors) 65536 processes 2047 Can anyone tell me how to set lockedmem to higher value on

Hi, i am using dovecot 2.2.33.2 on CentOS 7.4. Since i upgraded from CentOS 7.2. to CentOS 7.4. (without upgrading dovecot), my dovecot sieve-pipe scripts crash with Out of memory: Out of memory (allocated 262144) (tried to allocate 8793 bytes) There are some memory limits in dovecot or sieve? Can i change this value? Kernel limitks: [root at xxx software]# ulimit -a core file size

Windows 2000 sp2 with Terminal Services and Citrix 1.8 Metaframe as 'client'. --- Problem starts at 40 to 50 users logged on. 7-9 shares mapped at login. Effect is 'access denied' on accessing directories restricted by group access even though user has valid unix /etc/group access. --- Machine SunFire 880 Samba 2.2.4 Configured with "-without-winbind" Solaris 8

Hi I update os from debian8 to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master:

Hi, perhaps this? > with new debian9: > open files (-n) 1024 Regards Urban Am 16.09.20 um 12:57 schrieb Maciej Milaszewski: > Hi > Limits: > > Where all working fine: > > core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 > file size?????????????? (blocks,

I am using a member server with AD as my source of accounts. ssh logins work great. Yesterday, one of my students wanted to see what a fork bomb was and so now I need to place ulimits on place. Attempts to use AD domain groups fail. So I'm not sure this is an issue for samba+winbind or for /etc/security/limits.conf and pam. Here's what I have added in limits.conf # -- fix fork bomb

On 02/17/2016 07:08 AM, Michael H wrote: > On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what >> is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that >> needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list >> of updates. >> >> We released a new glibc yesterday for