similar to: question about libvirt and suspending guests during live migration

On 02/11/2014 04:45 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 02/10/2014 06:46 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments >> on whether this is a bug or design intent. >> >> We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, >> vcpu mask, etc.) that may need

Hi, We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments on whether this is a bug or design intent. We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, vcpu mask, etc.) that may need adjustment during the migration. We found that migrateToURI2() mostly works if we use XML created by copying the domain XML from the running instance

On 02/10/2014 06:46 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > We've run into a problem with libvirt 1.1.2 and are looking for some comments > on whether this is a bug or design intent. > > We're trying to use migrateToURI() but we're using a few things (numatune, > vcpu mask, etc.) that may need adjustment during the migration. We found that > migrateToURI2() mostly

Hi, when a normally running VM is migrated, libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_RESUMED_MIGRATED event on the destination once the migration completes. I can see that when a paused VM is migrated, libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED instead. Since there seems to be nothing migration specific about VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED event, my question is: Is it safe to assume on the

On 1/21/20 3:28 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote: > Hi, > > when a normally running VM is migrated, libvirt sends > VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_RESUMED_MIGRATED event on the destination once the > migration completes. I can see that when a paused VM is migrated, > libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED instead. > > Since there seems to be nothing migration specific about >

Hello On kubevirt project we are using IpV6 Kind cluster, and trying to support migration, but since both of the containers are on the same host we get this error {"component":"virt-launcher","level":"error","msg":"internal error: Attempt to migrate guest to the same host

Hi, I used to convert qemu XML to args with libvirt-1.0.3. But it failed to convert with libvirt-1.0.4. # virsh domxml-to-native qemu-argv test.xml >test.sh error: An error occurred, but the cause is unknown Comparing the debug file as below: 1) lbvirt-1.0.3 <cut> 2013-04-09 03:23:47.296+0000: 2669: debug : virEventPollInterruptLocked:716 : Interrupting 2013-04-09 03:23:47.296+0000:

scenario: i run a mix of libvirt 1.1.1 and 1.2.2 on the source hosts, 1.2.2 on the destination hosts qemu: 1.5.0+dfsg-3ubuntu5.3~cloud0 on all the hosts openstack havana and icehouse description: i have many compute nodes running libvirt+kvm, when i try to migrate guest that were created months ago it fails, if i create a vm and then migrate it works the problem is that libvirt cannot

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:47:50PM +0200, Or Shoval wrote: > Hello > > On kubevirt project we are using IpV6 Kind cluster, > and trying to support migration, > > but since both of the containers are on the same host > we get this error > > {"component":"virt-launcher","level":"error","msg":"internal error: Attempt

Hi Daniel, thanks for the quick reply we did try to override SMBIOS host_uuid_source = "machine-id" and it didn't work even that nodes have different [root@modi01 kubevirt]# ./cluster-up/ssh.sh kind-1.17.0-worker root@kind-1:/# cat /etc/machine-id [root@modi01 kubevirt]# ./cluster-up/ssh.sh kind-1.17.0-control-plane root@kind-1:/# cat /etc/machine-id

Hi Laine, Sorry to disturb you. It seemed this issue had been fixed in libvirt-1.2.2/libnl-3.2.22/linux-3.12. But we still got the error on PowerPC platform. I'll appreciate if you could give any suggestion. We are not sure if any netlink implementation in kernel space is missed. The scenario is a little complicated. We installed internal PF and VF kernel modules and want to use

# HG changeset patch # User john.levon@sun.com # Date 1171946682 28800 # Node ID e8a7491ed4c57d4d82642dd954b8909d9065b377 # Parent 24a6bc1d1b93405558741a2a8fa7ba2f7c44964a Xenconsoled should ignore spurious watch event. Otherwise, it can rebind to the same evtchn of a dying domU during suspending and cause below error message: (XEN) event_channel.c:177:d0 EVTCHNOP failure: domain 0, error -22,

I'm experiencing some real weirdness trying to get WoW to work in Wine on this laptop I have. It works pretty well (if a bit slow, but I'm willing to attribute that to the Intel graphics hardware) except that, at unpredictable intervals, the Wine process will suddenly freeze -- graphics stop updating and sound goes into a loop. The thing is that, if I run it from a terminal window, I can

Hello, pardon my chaotic question, but does anybody have an idea, why can't I suspend vim-enhanced-7.2.411-1.6.el6.x86_64 with a CTRL-Z, then execute few commands at my bash prompt and then get back to the vim session again with "fg"? It has stopped working at my CentOS 6.2 machine (I haven't noticed exactly when) but works fine with CentOS 5.x. I'm using PuTTY to login to

On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over unreliable > connections? I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad connections, I?d have told you SSHFS. NFS comes out of the "Unix lab? world, where all

> That's what I thought. Should I make a bug report? Sshfs is clearly intended > to reconnect automatically when mounted like that, and it doesn't do that. Not so clearly. Look at the sshfs reconnect option, and also ssh/ssfs ServerAliveInterval/ServerAliveCountMax.

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:36:03PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems > > over unreliable > > connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me > without all this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more

Seems to make suspend slightly more reliable on my system. Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org [3.7+] Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c index b6bdc9f..5032c31 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c @@ -464,6

On Tuesday, May 19, 2020 1:36:03 AM CEST Warren Young wrote: > On May 18, 2020, at 5:13 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > Is there a better alternative for mounting remote file systems over > > unreliable connections? > > I don?t have a good answer for you, because if you?d asked me without all > this backstory whether NFS or SSHFS is more tolerant of bad

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41608 Summary: Suspending/resuming system with cursor on external screen prevents said screen from restoring after resume Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium