similar to: Trouble moving OVMF guest to new host

On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 20:13 +0300, Aleksei wrote: > I'm running libvirt in user session and libvirt creates VARS part of OVMF in ~/.config/libvirt/qemu/nvram/ > Check your xml, there should be lines like this: > <os> >     <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-2.7'>hvm</type> >     <loader readonly='yes'

Greetings, I have the following machine: https://dpaste.com/5BPA3F77F which I'm trying to boot in uefi. /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf looks like this: https://dpaste.com/B3SFHUY6R and the ovmf files exists in the path, see: # ll /usr/share/edk2-ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd /usr/share/edk2-ovmf/OVMF_VARS.fd /usr/share/edk2-ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd /usr/share/edk2-ovmf/OVMF_VARS.secboot.fd -rw-r--r-- 1 root

This is only lightly tested. In particularly I only tested that the non-secure-boot path still works. I didn't test it on RHEL 7.3 yet because I haven't got enough free disk space for these giant source *.ova files :-( Will try to give that a go later. Rich.

Greetings Michal, > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 at 2:51 PM > From: "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> > To: "daggs" <daggs@gmx.com>, libvirt-users@redhat.com > Subject: Re: unable to find any master var store for loader error > > Hey, > > I'll paste the interesting part of domain XML here so that it doesn't > get lost:

First version was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-August/thread.html#00100 This is semantically the same as the first version. However I've split the patch up into two parts. In the first part, I factor out the UEFI paths so now they are created by the generator and written in the library and v2v/ directory directly, instead of the complex business of having a C

Using: edk2.git-0-20150803.b1141.ga0973dc.x86_64 edk2.git-ovmf-x64-0-20150802.b1139.gb234418.noarch On Fedora 22. Provisioning a i440FX system in virt-manager and attempting to boot results in successful EFI initialization, but the VM exits ungracefully after the bootloader (with F22 and CentOS 7 installer images). There's no really useful information in any of the logs. Using qemu-kvm

On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Ryan Barry wrote: >On 08/03/2015 01:43 PM, Ryan Barry wrote: >> Using: >> >> edk2.git-0-20150803.b1141.ga0973dc.x86_64 >> edk2.git-ovmf-x64-0-20150802.b1139.gb234418.noarch >> >> On Fedora 22. >> >> Provisioning a i440FX system in virt-manager and attempting to boot >> results in successful EFI

On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:11:29AM -0700, Ryan Barry wrote: >On 08/03/2015 10:47 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:39:30PM -0700, Ryan Barry wrote: >>> On 08/03/2015 01:43 PM, Ryan Barry wrote: >>>> Using: >>>> >>>> edk2.git-0-20150803.b1141.ga0973dc.x86_64 >>>>

Add new paths for the Secure Boot variant of OVMF as found in Fedora. --- generator/UEFI.ml | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/generator/UEFI.ml b/generator/UEFI.ml index 1ff3f84d2..bca3fa1ae 100644 --- a/generator/UEFI.ml +++ b/generator/UEFI.ml @@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ let firmware = [ "/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_VARS.fd", []; + "x86_64", +

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338083 Now that UEFI is fully open source the UEFI firmware can be included in Fedora. The location will be slightly different. These patches do a bit of code rearrangement and add the new paths. Rich.

Hello I have recently had to reinstall Centos 7.5 to on host computer. I have not be able to set-up qemu to support the q35 chip set. I have several virtual machines that require q35. This is not my first install, I have configured libvirt on many machines in the past, it just worked, it has not required any manual configuration. [root at sj aadmin]# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -machine help

Apologies if this has been gone over, but I believe I have checked the intertubes more than a bit..... I am using libvirt and have vms booting under an OVMF.fd to use an efi firmware. I can create vms, linux ubuntu, and they will boot up. However, everytime I reboot am I dropped into the default efi shell provide by the tianocore build. Then I must walk the FS to the booting efi app and run, in

On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > Hi guys. > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > ? <os> > ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> > ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' >

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 13:39:17 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 09:13, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: > > > > > > ? <os> > > > ??? <type arch='x86_64'

Commit 889386f8c6088e57fd68f2bb6bf85f69ecfc6f6c removed most of them already, so remove the last ones, and the supporting code. --- generator/UEFI.ml | 6 ------ v2v/utils.ml | 1 - 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/generator/UEFI.ml b/generator/UEFI.ml index 5161e28ee..1ff3f84d2 100644 --- a/generator/UEFI.ml +++ b/generator/UEFI.ml @@ -30,12 +30,6 @@ open Docstrings (* Order

Thanks VERY MUCH for all the info and help! Apologies for the extreme delay. I got distracted by other threads that forced out this work to later date. Also some frustration as well. ;) I completely missed this update. Apologies and thanks Will be diving back into this shortly! On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/21/16 19:53, jsl6uy js16uy

Hi guys. I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: ? <os> ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> ??? <loader readonly='yes' secure='yes' type='pflash'>/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd</loader> <nvram>/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/nvram/ubusrv1_VARS.fd</nvram>

On 11/04/2023 09:13, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:25:18 +0200, lejeczek wrote: >> Hi guys. >> >> I've have a guest and that guest differs from all other guest by: >> >> ? <os> >> ??? <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-rhel9.0.0'>hvm</type> >> ??? <loader readonly='yes'

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Whereas syslinux.efi apparently uses the embedded gpxe/ tree, and that > one uses TCP timestamps. See tcp_xmit() in gpxe/src/net/tcp.c: Actually syslinux.efi seems to be using the implementation calling into UEFI via these functions: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/boot/syslinux/syslinux.git/tree/efi/tcp.c I've tried to add debug messages to these

Hello all, hope all is well Was wondering if I'm doing something wrong/missing something. I have pxe+tftp+uefi working between 2 vms. However after the build is done and I reboot, I still come up to pxe b/c tianocore always starts, from what I've seen, with trying PXE first. Great for initial builds :) but I would like to it stop after. In the xml I am pointing to the disk to boot first.