similar to: how to create container image for an existing container

Dear all, I wonder if libvirt can work on Ubuntu. As you know, it is very convenient to install libvirt on Fedora. I can download the libvirt packet from libvirt.org and install it using command ./configure, make and make install. As I am going to install an open source simulation system named openairinterface, Ubuntu is the recommended OS, and I want to install the simulation system in libvirt

Libvirt is in the standard repositories... Why don't you just install it with ex tasksel? Van: WANG Cheng D [mailto:Cheng.d.Wang@alcatel-sbell.com.cn] Verzonden: donderdag 26 maart 2015 16:06 Aan: libvirt-users@redhat.com Onderwerp: [libvirt-users] Installation of libvirt on Ubuntu Dear all, I wonder if libvirt can work on Ubuntu. As you know, it is very convenient to install libvirt on

Dear all, I failed to start the linux container's network interface automatically. I have to start it manually each time after the container finishes booting. I know that in a native fedora, if we want the network interface to start automatically, we should edit "/etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0 and add the string "ONBOOT=yes". My host is fedora 16. I used "yum

Dear all, I failed to start the container's network interface automatically. I have to start it manually each time after the container finishes booting. I know that in a native fedora, if we want the network interface to start automatically, we should edit "/etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0 and add the string "ONBOOT=yes". My host is fedora. I used "yum

Dear Daniel, You said "use a real init system like systemd to spawn off the things", do you mean a full OS distro container? I installed the container using "yum --installroot=/root/fedora19lxc --releasever=19 install -y openssh, bridge-utils" which is described at https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2013-August/msg00007.html. I don't know how to make systemd

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:58PM +0530, Aarti Sawant wrote: > hello, > > i am new to lxc, i have created a lxc container on fedora 19 > i created a container rootfs of fedora 19 by using > yum --installroot=/containers/test1 --releasever=19 install openssh > > test1.xml file for container test1 > <domain type="lxc"> > <name>test1</name>

Dear all, I am not clear about the 'vcpu' element for CPU allocation. I allocated 1 vCPU to my container, after I started the container, I ran 4 computation-intensive tasks on the container. And I found all the 4 physical core are 100% used (my host has 4 physical cores and no other application ran on the host except the container). That is, all available cores were used by the container.

hello, i am new to lxc, i have created a lxc container on fedora 19 i created a container rootfs of fedora 19 by using yum --installroot=/containers/test1 --releasever=19 install openssh test1.xml file for container test1 <domain type="lxc"> <name>test1</name> <vcpu placement="static">1</vcpu> <cputune>

Hi, I've decided to use these summer holidays to wrap my head around Docker and its quirks. Spent the last couple weeks working through a Udemy tutorial and a thick book about Docker, and I have Docker CE installed on two machines: * my workstation running OpenSUSE Leap 15.1 * a public sandbox server running CentOS 7 I'm currently fiddling with custom networks and container

Hi Patrick, thanks for the pointers. I tried today, and while it was easy to start my first container, I am not really happy with LXD, exactly for the reason St?phane gives in https://stgraber.org/2016/03/11/lxd-2-0-introduction-to-lxd-112/ "How does LXD relate to Docker/Rkt?"... what I really like about docker and docker-compose is, that it encourages to separate code from data and

Hello I wanted to understand if there is a way to get LXC container's ip address. - virDomainInterfaceAddresses API only works for qemu/kvm and not with the lxc driver. What other options do I have? Using enter-lxc-namespace is throwing this error: virsh -c lxc:/// lxc-enter-namespace <domain> --noseclabel /sbin/ifconfig libvirt: error : Expected at least one file descriptor

Hi, I'm not libvirt expect. My guess is that some vcpu settings only apply to KVM/qemu backend. LXC is quite different from them. If setting vcpu# is not effective for LXC container, you may need to use cgroups. -- Thanks, Yuanle On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:32 PM, WANG Cheng D < Cheng.d.Wang@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am not clear about the

On 09/03/2018 11:05 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 03.09.18 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Marcano via samba: >> On 09/03/2018 04:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> >>> As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker >>> container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or >>>

Dear all, In my applications, the real-time performance is very important, so I used 4 containers, with only one application running in each container and a physical CPU core is only dedicated to one lxc. and I must know which container is hosted by which CPU core. That is, I need to pin a specific lxc to a specific CPU core. I can achieve this in a native linux system by the following xml

> * What are pros and cons of container vs. VMs? Same as any other containerized setup. We've been running our Samba DCs and file servers in nspawn containers (similar to LXC) for a couple of years, no container-specific issues yet. Though I'm not sure if docker is the right tool for the job; samba as a fat daemon running a bazillion subprocesses orchestrated by a persistent database

An updated version of CentOS Atomic Host (tree version 7.1706), is now available. [1] CentOS Atomic Host is a lean operating system designed to run Docker containers, built from standard CentOS 7 RPMs, and tracking the component versions included in Red Hat Enterprise Linux Atomic Host. [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download CentOS Atomic Host is available as a

On 01/30/2014 07:41 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Last night I was tinkering with `systemd-nspawn` -- namespace based > container for testing, I thought I'll post what I tried with libguestfs > here: > > > Prerequisite > ------------ > > Because of an audit subsystem incompatibility bug - rhbz#966807[1], turn > off auditing by booting the host w/

Dear Daniel, As you know, following your suggestion, I can expose shared memory to two containers hosted by the same machine, thus the two containers can exchange data. Now I have a new problem: how does the containers avoid concurrent accesses to the shared memory? In a native system, this can be achieved by using semaphore. But I don't know how the two containers can see the same semaphore.

Am 03.09.18 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Marcano via samba: > On 09/03/2018 04:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> >> As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker >> container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or >> understanding) for a 2nd physical DC. >> >> That 2nd DC *might* run as docker

Hello Patrick, >On 7/3/19 8:21 AM, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: >> Though I'm not sure if docker is the right tool for the job; samba as a >> fat daemon running a bazillion subprocesses orchestrated by a >> persistent database that's very sensitive to instances leaving and >> joining the domain seems the antithesis to docker's philosophy. >>