similar to: Routed mode problem with SSH

Hi guys, I describe the context of the problem below: I installed a Tor relay on a virtual machine on my server with IP 9.1.1.101. This virtual machine needs to use a static IP (9.1.1.102) to work as a Tor relay. After that I create a virtual network in *Routed mode* to connect to the physical network (used as a bridge between the virtual machine and the external network (Internet)). Since I

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote: > ... that's .. odd. > > Let's poke the freebsd crypto and network stack people and ask. I > can't imagine why this is a problem anymore and we should default to > it being on. I don't think there's a crypto@ list, though security@ might represent. > The other thing you could

* Published in IEEE Xplore * Google Scholar H5-Index = 22 ------------------------------ ---- Doctoral Symposium of CISTI'2023 ------------------------------ ------------ CISTI'2023 - 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies 20 - 23 of June 2023, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal http://cisti.eu/

Hi, I have installed a centos65_guest_1 system on a centos65 host with virt-manager. By default libvirt has a default network in NAT mode. At centos65_guest_1 when pinging to google it works. But I would like to use a routed mode for production enviroment with some services online, like http, ftp, ssh, etc. I have created the virtual network 192.168.100.0/24 with routed mode, and I have

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 6:17 AM, David P. Reed <dpreed at reed.com> wrote: > Tor needs this stuff very badly. Tor has many, many problematic behaviors relevant to congestion control in general. Let me paste a bit of private discussion I'd had on it in a second, but a very good paper that touched upon it all was: DefenestraTor: Throwing out Windows in Tor

Hi, I am writing this email in sincere hope that somebody experienced similar/same problem and found solution to it. The classical bridge setup could be achieved using brctl tool, which could be found at: http://home.regit.org/br2684.html I have an ADSL CO line card Linux based [2.4.24 kernel] with 8 nas interfaces and eth0. Rather than having bridge, the decision was to have a router, which

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 15:37, Rádio IRCBrasil - André Marcelo wrote: > I did a sujestion give me by karlH and brendan, i an running a icecast > master in port 8500 how relay, where the listenners connect, with a local > point ircbrasil.ogg and the relay poing djs.ogg and a secund server, in port > 8600, where the djs connect to streamin. The first dj enter ho djs.ogg and > the other

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 17:39, Rádio IRCBrasil - André Marcelo wrote: > So it´s very simple, i do a dj with the ircbrasil.ogg and a fallback > playlist.ogg > > so, when onde disconnect for the other enter, the playlist will assume and > my listenners will not disconnect, an i right? > > i yes, i dont need do the relay configuration, it will be very very simple no, you want

Karl u say, have an encoder send a never ending playlist to djs.ogg on your dj icecast and have each dj mountpoint state a fallback of djs.ogg. That way the listener relay will always pick something up. <p>So it´s very simple, i do a dj with the ircbrasil.ogg and a fallback playlist.ogg o, when onde disconnect for the other enter, the playlist will assume and my listenners will not

Hi, there are a way of encoding to a icecast in ogg, and have a relay, streaming in mp3? tanks Andr+AOk- Marcelo Internet R+AOE-dio Chat Brasil http://www.ircbrasil.com.br Fone: 61 341 3305 - cel: 61 9628 6588 msn: andre+AEA-ircbrasil.com.br -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster than a libvirt routed network? I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours on

Hi Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster than a libvirt routed network? I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours on

Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >> I have a C6 server acting as a kvm-host. >> >> When connecting with ssh the console is extremely slow and hangs for >> minutes at a time. Connecting to this server is not the problem. >> >> If I use: ssh root at host "whatever" I got immediate

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Rui Correia wrote: > Greetings folks. > I've setup libvirtd on my manjaro linux laptop. > Got a couple of VM's running (Win10 and Debian10) through NAT without any > issues. > > This is what the current network diagram looks like and it works fine: > > +-----------------------------------+ >

hi people, first i want to tank very much to karlH and brendan of the #icecat channel, they give me a good help yesterday, and i am almost resolvin my problem. i will explain my problem again, maybe other can help or see other way to resolv: I have a web radio in Brasil. This web radio have 25 djs, one in echat part of brasil. They stream to the icecast server from your studio. The listenners

Hi everyone, I just got a brand new server by Hetzner.de. The thing is, when you have additional IP, to use routed mode (precisely a subnet of IP, story of exposed MAC in their data center etc.) Bridged mode is NOT possible for getting connectivity in VM''s. Traditionally, I''m more confident with "standard" Xen setup, so it''s easy to switch from bridged to

Hello, Short question: * Node A is connected ("ConnectTo-Statement") to nodes B1, B2. * Tinc is operated in routed mode. * B1 and B2 are serving same subnets (Subnet=172.27.0.0/16, Subnet=fdd3:5d16:b5dd:3::0/64). How will tinc route packages to 172.27.0.0/16 and fdd3:5d16:b5dd:3::0/64 sent from A? * Will load balancing between B1 and B2 take place? * Is the decision stable - eg. is

Hi Patrick have you ever tried to find out on which side the hanger is: on the client's or on the server's, using tcpumg or the like? That migth help a bit further on, that might. suomi On 01/28/2015 05:41 PM, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > Op 28-01-15 om 17:20 schreef Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: >> On 28-01-2015 11:15, Patrick Bervoets wrote: >>> I have a C6 server acting as

On 2020-07-20 05:32, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Rui Correia wrote: >> Greetings folks. >> I've setup libvirtd on my manjaro linux laptop. >> Got a couple of VM's running (Win10 and Debian10) through NAT without >> any >> issues. >> >> This is what the current network diagram looks like and it works

OK, either I have taken a stupid pill and am missing something basic or routed network do not work. I assume that, if they did work, it would be in more or less that same manner as a nat network as far as ping'ing, ssh'ing, etc. to another real host on the same real LAN as the virtualization host. At least that is what I believe I should expect. I have googled for info and everything