similar to: export a cert

does anybody see this: unning transaction Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. ** Found 8 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts freeipa-admintools: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch ipa-client-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.x86_64 has installed conflicts freeipa-client:

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:44:06PM +0000, lejeczek wrote: > does anybody see this: > > unning transaction > Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. > ** Found 8 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output > follows: > ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch has installed conflicts > freeipa-admintools: ipa-admintools-4.4.0-14.el7.centos.noarch >

hi everyone, .. one of the Sambas fails to authenticate users. I have four virtually identical Samba systems which are configured as AD members. All servers seem fine, I can $ net ads lookup | status | dn | user | testjoin .. and so on. But, problem is that all servers except one can successfully: smbclient -L $(hostname) -UDOM\\user here that one server fails: SPNEGO login failed: Logon

On 01/09/16 15:57, Gaiseric Vandal via samba wrote: > In the past I used samba shares on top of autofs NFS > shares. I did not try samba over static NFS mounts > (file systems mounted by root manually or defined in > /etc/fstab.) I suspect therefore that you might have a > permissions issue. I said: ...seems ok on the clients but only - until a user want to change

On 13/08/2019 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 01:02:58PM +0100, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > >> I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? >> >> I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I >> might ask. > RHEL 7.7 has FreeIPA 4.6.5, and eventually CentOS will get that > version, but it's

hi guys, anybody observed, maybe has measured performance difference between the two with qemu quests(windows OS)? Any conclusions, recommendations? many thanks, L.

hi users a novice here hoping to grasp fundamentals soon I have a samba+sssd as a client to an AD - I have all the keytabs for a host(I think) but I noticed weird(to me at least) smbclient behavior. when I do: $ smbclient -L swir -U me at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k all works, clients sees local samba's shares, when I do: $ smbclient -L swir.private.aaa.private.dom -U pe243 at AAA.PRIVATE.DOM -k

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Hm..it's been 10 mins..I don't see anything more in the file where I > redirected stdout of 'febootstrap' cmd. > > Roughly, can you guess how much time this takes? For me it has so far taken a lot longer. The problem is that the number of dependent packages is probably 100s. If you want something

Running virt-builder in a guest Fedora-20 guest hypervisor w/ Rawhide Kernel, throws the below: $ virt-builder fedora-20 --format qcow2 --size 20G virt-builder: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libgnutls.so.28: undefined symbol: nettle_secp_256r1 Version on L1 (guest hypervisor) -------------------------------- $ uname -r; rpm -q libvirt-daemon-kvm qemu-system-x86 \ libguestfs gnutls

hi guys I wonder if anybody might version of freeIPA in RHEL? I hear it's 4.6.6 and if that's true then when will Centos get it I might ask. many thanks, L.

Logs from newly added node helped me in RCA of the issue. Info file on node 10.5.6.17 consist of an additional property "tier-enabled" which is not present in info file from other 3 nodes, hence when gluster peer probe call is made, in order to maintain consistency across the cluster cksum is compared. In this case as both files are different leading to different cksum, causing state in

On 19/04/2023 08:04, wwp wrote: > Hello lejeczek, > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:50:29 +0200 lejeczek via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > >> Hi guys. >> >> I cannot wrap my hear around this: >> >> -> $ unset _Val; test -z ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $ unset _Val; test -n ${_Val}; echo $? >> 0 >> -> $

On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster > volume status and gluster peer status. > > Apart? from above info, please provide glusterd logs, > cmd_history.log. > > Thanks > Gaurav > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:22 PM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:

Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log. On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 13/09/17 06:21, Gaurav Yadav wrote: > >> Please provide the output of gluster volume info, gluster volume status >> and gluster peer status. >> >> Apart from above info, please provide glusterd logs,

On 01/05/18 23:59, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:46 AM, lejeczek > <peljasz at yahoo.co.uk <mailto:peljasz at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote: > > hi guys > > I have a simple case of: > $ setfacl -b > not working! > I copy a folder outside of autofs mounted gluster vol, > to a regular fs and removing acl works as

Additionally the brick log file of the same brick would be required. Please look for if brick process went down or crashed. Doing a volume start force should resolve the issue. On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 16:28, Gaurav Yadav <gyadav at redhat.com> wrote: > Please send me the logs as well i.e glusterd.logs and cmd_history.log. > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, lejeczek

hi everyone, is there a way to add custom mount points at installation point? And if there is would you say /usr should/could go onto a separate partition? many thanks, L.

1) one peer, out of four, got separated from the network, from the rest of the cluster. 2) that unavailable(while it was unavailable) peer got detached with "gluster peer detach" command which succeeded, so now cluster comprise of three peers 3) Self-heal daemon (for some reason) does not start(with an attempt to restart glusted) on the peer which probed that fourth peer. 4) fourth

I guess this would be a common case, I am hoping for some final clarification. a few Linux boxes share ldap (multi-master) backend that PAM/SSSD uses to authenticated users, and these LDAPs are also is used by Samba, users start @ uid 1000. Boxes are in the same both DNS and Samba domains. Do I treat these users as system or virtual users from postfix/dovecot perspective? If it can be a

hi all I remember that in the past many would say these two do not go well together, but I wonder if situation improved now? Reason I'm asking is because I decided to give it another try and I have an nfs4 mount point that I make a share in Samba 3.6.23-36.el6_8 and everything seems ok on the clients but only - until a user want to change content of a file or copy that file, then