similar to: Need information

Hi, in bridge mode all the guests and hosts should be in the same subnet always ? Thanks Kumar On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> wrote: > On 05/20/2016 03:21 AM, Gk Gk wrote: > > Hi, > > Referring to the link http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking, > the scenario described for the routed mode, explains that > > "Host

Hi, Referring to the link http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/VirtualNetworking, the scenario described for the routed mode, explains that "Host has public IP and virtual machines have static public IPs. But one can't use bridged networking, since provider accept only packets from the MAC address of the host" Can someone explain to me why doesn't the switch accept the packets from

Hi Peter and other Libvirt-Users, Thank you, I greatly appreciate your response. The diagram I provided may be a little misleading, so I have attached a new diagram (also available here: https://i.imgur.com/X3nFMCz.png ). I think I also need to provide some more detail about my scenario here: These physical nodes are provided to me by "bare-metal cloud" providers like Scaleway / OVH /

hi. Are you add only 0.0.0.0/1 as route, not 128.0.0.0/1 too? Did you tried to add route to 5.6.7.8 via C with lesser metric then via B? If you have to add static routes only on a few servers, you can add them to the $HOST-up scripts. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Zhang Jun <gb2313 at gmail.com> wrote: > my network: > > local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A(

my network: local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A( 192.168.1.1/24&11.22.33.44pppoe&10.10.10.1/24 tinc)<---remote B: 10.10.20.1/24 ^ | remote C:10.10.0.1/24 all running tinc 1.0.x, ADSL router

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

Hi, Net-dump xml File. root@NFV-FRU:~# virsh net-dumpxml data-2 <network> <name>data-2</name> <uuid>ace4935f-0367-4632-be7c-61bab2da7d4a</uuid> <bridge name='data-2br1' stp='on' delay='0'/> <mac address='52:54:00:46:43:7d'/> <ip address='10.12.12.1' netmask='255.255.255.240'>

Hi, I'm new to libvirt so please bear with me. I am trying to set up a routed subnet on my laptop with libvirt, hoping it to be able to communicate with all servers in my nw. My laptop is on a subnet, 192.168.2.0/24, with a static ip, 192.168.2.27. I have "more or less" followed this guide for routed networks,

It's a pity I don't know how to re-create the issue. While there are 1-2 crashed clients in total 120 clients every day. Below is gdb result: (gdb) where #0 0x0000003267432885 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x0000003267434065 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x000000326746f7a7 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x00000032674750c6 in malloc_printerr () from

Hello list, We have KVM setup using libvirt (0.9.0) as configuration device on a Debian Squeeze Host. Networking is done in routed bridge mode and we have two different subnets, as well as one main ip. Subnets get routed to the main ip (this is done by our provider). Network on hosts are done like this: <network> <name>subnet_1</name>

Hi Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster than a libvirt routed network? I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours on

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:10:01PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 13/06/2019 19:57, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:02:27PM +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >>On 13/06/2019 18:21, Stefan Froehlich via samba wrote: > >>>File server and Linux clients shall use the AD-backend, so I read > >>>and followed

I am using CHANNEL function to store the rtt as variable in cdr.When i checked the records i found that rtt was always zero.To double check i turned on rtcp debug I was only able to see sent rtcp,sending rtcp but no got rtcp. Also the timestamps in rtp debug were oddly dissimilar.Is there a prblem wth my timestamp or is this a known bug? --

Greetings all! I just got a colocated server space and the ISP has given me an IP address and a routable /29 subnet. Here''s a partial snippet of the info they gave me (with the real addressess changed for privacy) ==== WAN Address Customer IP Address : 100.0.33.14 Netmask : 255.255.255.248 Broadcast Address : 100.0.33.15 Default Gateway :

Hi Is it expected behaviour that a libvirt NAT-based network is faster than a libvirt routed network? I would guess that the routed network would be the fastest one in all cases, but I'm seeing the opposite in my setup. On a 100mbit internet connection, the routed network tops at 4mbyte/sec, while the nat-based network goes all the way to 10mbyte/sec. I've spend the last 6 hours on

Okay. I may be missing something; from what you explicitly write about subnets, it sounds like you only have one, but if you don't have two subnets, why do you need a DHCP relay? SO. Assuming you have two subnets: * It sounds as if your DHCP request is generating an ACK. * I'm 99% sure your ACK has to traverse the DHCP helper and wend its way back to the originating host. So

On 10/02/2018 08:50 AM, Olivier Léobal wrote: > Hello, > > 'Isolated' networks created in VMM (I’m running 1.4.3) still connect to > the host (as gateway). Is it possible to avoid this? It is my > understanding that QEMU provides a 'restrict' option for that, but I > don't understand it well, and can’t find it in VMM. > ccing libvirt-users That's

hi everybody I'm looking at my setup and got stuck I have a box with two NICs on the same subnet, and another box similar, also two NICs on one subnet, all four NICs are on the same subnet. Now, that second box has also a virtual NIC (libvirtd's bridge route mode) and VMs guests are using it, traffic to that virtual net is routed via 1st real NIC. This second box dhcrelays to the

Hi all, I am using a redhat 8.x linux box configured with zebra routing software which is also configured with ospfd I have 2 backbone routers running ospf connected to different isp''s I have 3 local routers also running ospf within themselfs and also with the 2 backbone routers (all are linux boxes) router A - backbone router 1 router B - backbone router 2 router C - local router 1

Hi, I've oh323 chan installed and working to make calls from SIP to H323 devices. The problem is can no hear sound with the H323 device. I think this is some related with codecs o nat, because the H323 have one public IP from a different subnet from the asterisk box. If I use netmeeting in gateway mode, the call can be completed and I can talk with a SIP device, but in gateway mode I can not