similar to: [Ceph] blockInfo cannot work with network type disk

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "[Ceph] blockInfo cannot work with network type disk"

2016 Dec 06
1
How can openstack retrieve the CPU usage of a lxc via libvirt?
Dear all, I want to have a view of lxc CPU usage in openstack Dashboard. According the Openstack official site , Openstack Ceilometer can poll libvirt daemon to obtain CPU usage of a virtual machine. I tried the command locally on the libvirtd host "virsh -c lxc:/// domjobinfo", I got an error "error: this function is not supported by the connection driver:
2013 Feb 02
0
Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Saturday 2 February 19:03:31 UTC 2013 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: cliff-tablib > tags 699594 + pending Bug #699594 [wnpp] ITP: cliff-tablib -- tablib formatters for cliff Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package
2016 Feb 16
1
bug in Libvirt(-python)?
Hi, I've noticed that the capacity of the disk in one of my VMs is completely wrongly reported by the python api. The image was transfered using scp but the transfer was aborted and now the api show a strange value: [root@virt83 ~]# du -h /var/lib/libvirt/images/test-disk1 706M /var/lib/libvirt/images/test-disk1 [root@virt83 ~]# ls -lh /var/lib/libvirt/images/test-disk1 -rw-r--r--. 1 root
2016 Oct 29
2
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state
Hi all, This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the idea is that the cursor would store the block info block state for whichever block info block is active for that cursor). Duncan objected to it on the grounds that we should aim for a design that would
2016 Nov 01
0
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100> > > That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to accommodate multiple block info blocks (the idea is that the cursor would store the
2016 Nov 01
1
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state
> On 2016-Oct-31, at 20:30, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 28, 2016, at 6:00 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26100 >> >> That change moves the block info block state from BitstreamReader to BitstreamCursor in order to
2016 Nov 30
2
virDomainBlockInfo for local volume
Hi, I am using virStorageVolGetInfo to get the volume size virStorageVol.download to download a normal file for VDSM project. I want to add support for block devices as well, I was able to see the size via virDomainBlockInfo and download via virDomain.blockPeek which is works fine for both file and block device. 1. Can I depend on virDomainBlockInfo for non block devices? 2. Does the
2010 Jul 01
0
ANNOUNCE: ruby-libvirt bindings 0.2.0
Hello all, I'm pleased to announce the release of 0.2.0 of the ruby-libvirt bindings. This release has a number of new features: - Updated Storage class, implementing pool.active?, pool.persistent?, pool.vol_create_xml_from - Updated Connect class, implementing conn.node_free_memory, conn.node_cells_free_memory, conn.node_get_security_model, conn.encrypted?, conn.libversion, and
2016 May 31
0
domain disk used
Hi,all, i used the libvirt Python API in OpenStack environment,Now how to get disk usage size of domain(It is used size,not total size,can get total size using blockInfo(),)? How to get a memory usage of Domain Windows? I hope get help from you! Very Thanks ! Leo Tod
2016 Dec 05
0
Re: virDomainBlockInfo for local volume
Ping On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Shahar Havivi <shavivi at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using virStorageVolGetInfo to get the volume size > virStorageVol.download to download a > normal file for VDSM project. > > I want to add support for block devices as well, I was able to see the size > via virDomainBlockInfo and download via virDomain.blockPeek which
2016 Dec 20
1
Re: virDomainBlockInfo for local volume
On 12/05/2016 05:27 AM, Shahar Havivi wrote: > Ping > Sorry for the delay... Lots of investigation, patches, and other work. > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Shahar Havivi <shavivi@redhat.com > <mailto:shavivi@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using virStorageVolGetInfo to get the volume size > virStorageVol.download to download a >
2017 Jun 01
0
Who's using OpenStack Cinder & Gluster? [ Was Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder]
Joe, Agree with you on turning this around into something more positive. One aspect that would really help us decide on our next steps here is the actual number of deployments that will be affected by the removal of the gluster driver in Cinder. If you are running or aware of a deployment of OpenStack Cinder & Gluster, can you please respond on this thread or to me & Niels in private
2015 Mar 13
0
Re: Name resolution not working inside virt-customize
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:28:56AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On 03/13/2015 11:13 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > >Yes, the log indicates name resolution not working. Please try the > >diagnosis steps that I outlined in: > > > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-March/msg00075.html > > Sorry, I somehow missed the above message. > > $
2011 Jun 06
0
Release of libvirt-0.9.2
As planned the new release is available at: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/ It is a rather large release with near 400 commits included. From an user point of view the main improvement is likely to be when using migration as various work has been done to extend the protocol and to avoid having the migration command stop other concurrent operations (like virsh list). See below for a number of
2018 Sep 20
2
Interest in fast BitVector?
Some time ago I developed a fast BitVector class to use in some research here. It uses expression templates to fuse operation loops and runs much faster than the existing BitVector for some important use-cases. It also has the ability to efficiently report if a BitVector's contents changed after some operation. For example: ETBitVector A = ... ETBitVector B = ... ETBitVector C = ... bool
2012 Sep 26
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if
2021 Jan 07
1
HCI Cluster - CentOS8 to Streams Upgrade Broken
I have a test environment. Three node HCI cluster. CentOS8 build. Gluster as file system with standard cockpit deploy of HCI. Converted to CentOS Streams which seemed to go fine. Did a yum update and no issues. Did a reboot.. and now engine will no longer start. So I can no longer start my Virtual machines. I posted as bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911910 I posted to
2011 Feb 14
1
Use libvirt-python to attach cdrom
Hi all, I want to attach cdrom by libvirt.py .But can't find a func in libvirt.py can finish this work. Who can help me ? Regard -- Seven Ling E-mail: jiejie.ling at qq.com
2007 Sep 04
1
[LLVMdev] Bitcode format
Reid Spencer <rspencer <at> reidspencer.com> writes: > Hi Joshua, Hi, thanks for the reply. > On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 21:34 +0000, Joshua Haberman wrote: > > I also have a few questions about the format: > > > > - it appears that the only magic number in the file is > > application-specific. This seems unfortunate, because it means that > >
2012 Jul 16
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM incubation, or requirements for committing new backends
Tom, I think it might be productive to fork this thread to discuss making the requirements for upstreaming a new LLVM target more explicit and open. I'd also like to gauge interest in an idea I've discussed privately with a few community members, namely the concept of having a semi-official "incubation" system whereby proposed backends could get a trial run before becoming part