similar to: 100% CPU when using nested virtualization

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1500 matches similar to: "100% CPU when using nested virtualization"

2017 Nov 14
1
Live migration haswell, broadwell
Hi I wonder, if live migration (back and forth) is possible on mixed Haswell (Xeon V3) and Broadwell (Xeon V4) installations. The only notable difference between the two is apparently a working TSX implementation on V4, which got disabled on V3 due to bugs. The rest (VMCS-shadowing, posted interrupts) should not apply to our environment, as we do not run nested-vmx nor device-passthrough on
2016 Mar 17
2
Networking in KVM
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: rgb(0, 0, 0); FONT-SIZE: 12px"><div>Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing virtual machines communicating with each other.<br /><br />However, any new virtual machines I created after making the changes can't communicate with anything, they can't even get out to the internet, even if I manually
2016 Mar 18
2
Networking in KVM
Paul, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: > On 17/03/16 04:47 PM, paul.greene.va at verizon.net wrote: > > Thanks, I followed the 2nd article, and it got the existing virtual > > machines communicating with each other. > Right, so your VMs are on the same bridge group now (at Layer2 of OSI). > > > > However, any new
2016 Mar 11
0
Re: 100% CPU when using nested virtualization
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:29:08PM -0500, Digimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I got a new laptop recently and what worked before no longer works > (Fedora 23 on the laptops in both cases)... > > I'm trying to get nested virtualization to work because I use the VMs > on the laptop to simulate an HA cluster that itself hosts VMs. I don't > care much at all about the
2005 Apr 20
2
fSeries Technical Analysis rsiTA problem
fSeries Technical Analysis rsiTA problem Hello, I?m trying to use the rsiTA() function but keep getting this error: >rsiTA(tsx,14) Error in "[.timeSeries"(close, 1:(length(close) - 1)) : only 0's may be mixed with negative subscripts Here?s is the first three lines of my data: >tsx[1:3,] close 2004-04-18 20:00:00 8702.82 2004-04-19
2011 Dec 01
1
combining arima and ar function
Hi everyone I've got a problem regarding the arima() and the ar() function for autoregressive series. I would simply like to combine them. To better understand my question, I first show you how I'm using these two functions individually (see file in the attachement). 1) apply(TSX,2, function(x) ar(na.omit(x),method="mle")$order # this function finds the optimal
2017 May 11
2
CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF
2014 Sep 19
3
Standardizing an MSR or other hypercall to get an RNG seed?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:06:55PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:40:42AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> > >> There is a huge disadvantage to the fact that CPUID is a user space > >> instruction, though. > > > > But if the goal is to
2014 Sep 19
3
Standardizing an MSR or other hypercall to get an RNG seed?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:06:55PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso at mit.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 09:40:42AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> > >> There is a huge disadvantage to the fact that CPUID is a user space > >> instruction, though. > > > > But if the goal is to
2016 Jun 15
2
Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5
Hello, all. Hope all is well Is it possible to install kernel and support files from 6u7 into a base 6u5 image to achieve full broadwell support in 6u5? We are "locked", clearly not fully since willing to up jump kernels, on 6u5. Thanks for any and all help
2013 Feb 19
9
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Add Intel TSX HLE Support
Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for
2017 Jul 06
2
Live Migration and LibVirt CPU Mode
Hi All, First time mailing here, I hope someone can help. We?re running a OpenStack Newton environment on top of CentOS-7.3, LibVirt and Qemu-KVM-EV. We are encountered an issue live migrating a VM between 2 hosts with different CPUs and LibVirt throws the following error: libvirtError: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features:
2017 May 11
2
CentOS 6 / Intel CPU support
> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6
2016 Jun 15
4
Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5
Thanks much for the the reply! Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting 26XXv4 chipsets. regards On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 6/15/2016 2:48 PM, jsl6uy
2017 May 09
2
asterisk 13.15.0 stopping/crashing
hi, i have strange problem with asterisk 13.15.0+pjsip bundled/centos 7/systemd start script we are using chan_pjsip only for webrtc endpoints . switched from sipml5 to jssip with upgrade to 13.15.0(from 13.9.0) few days ago today i have problems with stopping/crashing asterisk /var/log/asterisk/messages dont show any clues [May 9 12:10:52] WARNING[25762] pjproject: tsx0x7fbb28024088
2014 Apr 10
1
[PATCH RFC V2 4/4] tools: virtio: add a top-like utility for displaying vhost satistics
On Fri, 03/21 17:41, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch adds simple python to display vhost satistics of vhost, the codes > were based on kvm_stat script from qemu. As work function has been recored, > filters could be used to distinguish which kinds of work are being executed or > queued: > > vhost statistics > > vhost_virtio_update_used_idx 1215215 0
2014 Apr 10
1
[PATCH RFC V2 4/4] tools: virtio: add a top-like utility for displaying vhost satistics
On Fri, 03/21 17:41, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch adds simple python to display vhost satistics of vhost, the codes > were based on kvm_stat script from qemu. As work function has been recored, > filters could be used to distinguish which kinds of work are being executed or > queued: > > vhost statistics > > vhost_virtio_update_used_idx 1215215 0
2017 Mar 07
4
Help needed on a gentoo system after update to libvirtd 3.1.0
(sorry, dont know how i put my posting into an reply to an other issue before, new posting to sepearte it, big sorry) Hello list, i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to 3.1.0 Now my windows machines cant access internet. I did a virbr1 with virt-manager and route it to the eth0, works fine on 2.5 Hello list, i updated on a gentoo system from libvirtd 2.5 to 3.1.0 Now my
2019 Jan 07
2
[RFC PATCH V3 0/5] Hi:
On 2019/1/3 ??4:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:46:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This series tries to access virtqueue metadata through kernel virtual >> address instead of copy_user() friends since they had too much >> overheads like checks, spec barriers or even hardware feature >> toggling. > Will review, thanks! > One questions
2019 Jan 07
2
[RFC PATCH V3 0/5] Hi:
On 2019/1/3 ??4:47, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 08:46:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This series tries to access virtqueue metadata through kernel virtual >> address instead of copy_user() friends since they had too much >> overheads like checks, spec barriers or even hardware feature >> toggling. > Will review, thanks! > One questions