similar to: Passing a USB hub

Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because I can't quite tell if the issue is: - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be triggered if I have a USB-C yubikey in the port. With 5.7, my issues went away if I removed the USB key during boot, showing an interaction

@fsp Please forward to development, manufacturing and quality management department: Model EP1000(PPF6000/100), 431107300095, 4711140480534, Art-Nr. 8296861, 70539, 14Z00000, 35-0200116-01G @nut-users http://www.networkupstools.org/ 2.4.3 debian stable, 2.6.2 upstream, linux 2.6.38-debian-bpo # /usr/local/src/nut-2.6.2/drivers/blazer_usb -u root -DDDDD -a ups Network UPS Tools - Megatec/Q1

On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 8:52 PM Marc MERLIN <marc_nouveau at merlins.org> wrote: > > Ok, I have an update to this problem. I added the nouveau list because > I can't quite tell if the issue is: > - the PCIe changes that went in 5.6 I think (or 5.5?), referenced below > > - a new issue with thunderbold on thinkpad P73, that seems to be > triggered if I have a USB-C

On 09/11/2017 10:49 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Mike writes: > >> On 9/10/2017 6:41 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> > Dutchman01 writes: >> > >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I request a new NUT release as current dates back to March 9, >> 2016: NUT 2.7.4 >> >> >> >> The

On 9/10/2017 6:41 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Dutchman01 writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> ? >> >> I request a new NUT release as current dates back to March 9, 2016: NUT 2.7.4 >> >> The fact stays that not all distro?s use latest snapshots/commits from github >> dev tree. >> >> ? >> >> So please do release a new up to

Hi guys, I want to attach a few USB disks to specified USB controller in domain on libvirt layer, but I didn't find any method to deal with it. Anyone can help me on that? I added some USB type disk to my domain, started it, I found all USB disk had been attached to same USB controller automatically, I want to assign some USB disks to another controller manually but I can't find the

Dear R community, I'm running R 32 bits in a 64-bits machine (with 16Gb of Ram) using a PAE kernel, as you can see here: $ uname -a Linux mymachine 2.6.18-238.el5PAE #1 SMP Sun Dec 19 14:42:44 EST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux When I try to create a large matrix ( Q.obs <- matrix(NA, nrow=6940, ncol=9000) ), I got the following error: > Error: cannot allocate vector of size 238.3

Hi Asterisk Users, I would like to handle about 250 simultaneous (calls & agents only) calls with PRI or a SIP trunk with the following configuration Dell R710 Dual Intel? Xeon? X5650, 2.66Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1333MHz or Single Intel? Xeon? X5650, 2.66Ghz, 12M Cache,Turbo, HT, 1333MHz Memory 12GB, 1333MHz RAID 1 - 1 Tb X 2 Is that possible?? Kind Regards Juan. Linux User #441131

Hi, With help from Oleg we got the right patches applied and NFS working well. Maximum performance was about 60 MB/sec. Last week that dropped to about 12.5 MB/sec and I cannot find a reason. Lustre clients all obtain 100+ MB/sec on GigE. Each OST is good for 270 MB/sec. When mounting the client on one of the OSSs I get 230 MB/sec. Seems the speed is there. How can NFS and Lustre be tuned

On 31.05.2013 07:05, vikrant verma wrote: > Hello Michal, > > Throttling is working now after setting inbound.average = 10 (i have > set other values to 0 ) > But i am observing an inconsistent behavior in the observed throttling > bandwidth > > when i set inbound.average = 10 , i observed bandwidth of 24 kbps > when i set inbound.average = 100 , i observed

I have an ext4 filesystem for which the reported disk usage is not correct. I have noticed the discrepancy after I rsync-ed the content to another filesystem and noticed that the used space on the target is almost double of the size reported on the source. Both machines are running the same software - with the same kernel version and same coreutils version (which I later upgraded to latest

Hello after a lvm snapshot creation and a reboot are all logical volumes are missing, only swap is present. lvcreate -L 5000M -s -n centos_h1-root_snap /dev/mapper/centos_h1-root lvs LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert centos_h1-root_snap centos_h1 swi-a-s--- 4,88g root 0,00 home

Sorry if this is a repost- I wasn''t sure if the www.ruby-forum.com list works for postings. I''ve been having trouble with indexing a large amount of documents(2.4M). Essentially, I have one process that is following the tutorial dumping documents to an index stored on the file system. If I open the index with another process, and run the size() method it is stuck at a number

Hi, I need to upload files larger than 4.4Gb (iso DVD) on CentOS (5.5 x64) http server (httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos) On the apache server set in my /etc/php.ini upload_max_filesize = 4900M post_max_size = 5000M In my httpd.conf I set : LimitRequestBody 0 I'm using firefox and/or chrome client for upload a file with 4.2gb size on the server. But it doesn't work.

On 7/1/2015 2:58 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> I'm setting up UEFI booting and got to the point of having the system talk >> >to the dhcpd/tftpd server, grab the first image files (syslinux.efi) and >> >then continuously request the secondary image file (ldlinux.e64). > So it appears to go deaf. > >> >I'm wondering if I'm missing something or if someone

I'm trying to do an fsck on an ext3 partition but I'm seeing abysmally slow disk throughput; monitoring with "dstat" (like vmstat) shows ~1200-1500KB/s throughput to the disks. Even with 24hrs of fsck-ing I only get ~3% (still in pass1). The filesystem is ext3 running "e2fsck -C0 /dev/sda3" and about 3.7TB on an x86_64-based system with 4GB RAM. e2fsprogs is 1.41.9.

Dear llvm developpers, I followed the tutorial to build llvm and clang provided here: https://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html The sources are in sync with subversion repository, and I ended up with more than 30GB of binaries in llvm/bin as shown at the end of this message. I assume I did something wrong, but I did not find any entry in the doc that helps me understand how to reduce the size of

Hello, I saw some patches about PCI-passthrough for HVM(non-IOMMU) and I am interested in it. I want to assign my graphics card(nVidia GeForce 7900GS) to an HVM domain (Vista) in order to run 3D-intensive work(for example, 3D-games). What I want to ask is that is it really possible to pass the graphics card to HVM domain running Vista now? That is, have anyone ever successfully

Hello, I saw some patches about PCI-passthrough for HVM(non-IOMMU) and I am interested in it. I want to assign my graphics card(nVidia GeForce 7900GS) to an HVM domain (Vista) in order to run 3D-intensive work(for example, 3D-games). What I want to ask is that is it really possible to pass the graphics card to HVM domain running Vista now? That is, have anyone ever successfully

Hell all, I am doing some research work on protecting Xen''s data structures. I know there is a direct-map area(about 12M), in which we can get the physical address of the data structure from its virtual address. My question is : are the stack and the heap of Xen both located in this direct-map area? Since I need protect stack and heap data, so it is easy to identify their physical