similar to: Issues with libvirt virtual networking

Hi all, I have done some tests for the new attributes "check" and "type", could you please help to have a check? And I have some questions about the patch, please help to have a look, Thank you! The questions: 1. in step 4 below, the error message should be updated: Actual results: XML error: invalid mac address **check** value: 'next'. Valid values are

19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > >> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >>> <snip/> >>> >>> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration: >>> thomas@vm02-fai:~$ cat /etc/network/interfaces >>> # This

19. Juli 2017 17:19, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > 19. Juli 2017 17:12, c.monty@web.de schrieb: > >> 19. Juli 2017 16:36, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: >> >>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >> <snip/> >> >> Guest OS is Debian 9 with this network configuration: >> thomas@vm02-fai:~$

Hi Parke, Thanks, no I had not run those commands, but after doing so, my VPN address is not visible. See below: nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ sudo systemctl enable tinc at VPN1 Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/tinc.service.wants/tinc at VPN1.service → /lib/ systemd/system/tinc at .service. nsasia at db2:/etc/tinc$ systemctl start tinc at VPN1 ==== AUTHENTICATING FOR

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

> Dear CentOS-Community, > > we are facing the following issue: > > A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which > causes several issues in our setup. Hi, Can you show as the config of eno4? And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a difference somewhere. Regards, Simon > > > This server is equipped with four nics

I should have what i want to achive. The server is intended as a host for VMs. Our network has multiple VLANs, and the VMs will be connected to different VLANS. The interface eno1 is for host traffic and eno2 is connected to the trunk port of the switch, making the different VLANS availabel to the VMs via the br0. I want to use a VLAN-aware br0, so that I specify in my VM config (on the host

Hello all I have weird problem i can't understand and don't know where to look. [root at chamber ~]# ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

Dear list, Being a libvirt noob, I have some trouble understanding. It is about getting two different guest in the same network. *********** I've defined a network with libvirt. This is the source xml: <network> <name>private2</name> <uuid>9684f2c6-6fd0-491b-9cb5-80ee268b01ce</uuid> <bridge name='br2' stp='on' delay='0'/>

Hello all, I am trying to find out how the AAAA records are added in my SambA AD DC setup but it is not clear how they should be added. Here are my zones: ? pszZoneName???????????????? : 56.168.192.in-addr.arpa ? Flags?????????????????????? : DNS_RPC_ZONE_DSINTEGRATED DNS_RPC_ZONE_UPDATE_SECURE ? ZoneType??????????????????? : DNS_ZONE_TYPE_PRIMARY ? Version???????????????????? : 50 ?

Thanks for the info. brctl show virbr0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic brctl show virbr1 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces virbr1 8000.5254009c3902 yes virbr1-nic ip a s virbr0 3: virbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu

Am 01.04.2020 um 21:56 schrieb Jerry Geis: > Thanks for the info. > > brctl show virbr0 > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > virbr0 8000.525400fc34af yes virbr0-nic > > brctl show virbr1 > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > virbr1 8000.5254009c3902 yes

Hi Lars, Appreciate all your help, unfortunately the problem remains. I've marked up below: >>> Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> 22-May-19 4:02 PM >>> Hello Robert, Am Mon, 20 May 2019 11:11:39 +0700 schrieb "Robert Horgan" <Robert at gainplus.asia>: > These are my files: > > On server 1: db2 > > /etc/tinc/nets.boot > # >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3631 Bug ID: 3631 Summary: ssh fe80 -b invalid argument failure Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.9p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On 06/04/2017 05:46 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 08:27:08PM -0400, Michael C Cambria wrote: >> >> >> On 06/03/2017 05:47 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 05:20:47PM -0400, Michael C Cambria wrote: >>>> I also tried stopping libvirtd, renaming both qemu-system-i386 and >>>> qemu-system-x86_64,

Hi !, I have this problem. On a Mandrake 10.0 server with all the updates (Kernel 2.6.3-15mdk, iptables-1.2.9-7mdk and shorewall-2.0.3a-1mdk), one of our internal users have to FTP some files to our external web server. I think we have the correct configuration and rules in shorewall, and have read the http://www.shorewall.net/FTP.html document. Still, our users can''t FTP to the

Hello Lars, Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately I made an error in writing the network I expected to connect to. I meant 10.3.0.0/24 The one I wrote in fact was one network of the already established VPN. I have included full details of my relevant files below. Background: I am trying to set up a second VPN between two servers: gtdb and db2. Both servers are already part of separate