similar to: VM locking

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:01:58PM +0000, Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to use VM (disk) locking on a two node Centos 7 KVM cluster. Unfortunately, I am not successful. > > Using virtlockd (https://libvirt.org/locking-lockd.html), I get each > host to write the zero length file with a hashed filename to the shared > folder specified.

Dear All, using CentOS 7.2.1511, and libvirt from ovirt repositories (currently 1.2.17-13.el7_2.5, but without otherwise using ovirt) I am regularly backing up my VMs which are on qcow2 files. In general, I am trying to follow http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Live-disk-backup-with-active-blockcommit A typical backup script would be #!/bin/bash dt=`date +%y%m%d` if virsh dominfo dockers10a | grep

Hi all, Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts. ./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :) Nevertheless, running virtlockd -d && service libvirtd restart works fine. Am I wrong thinking that editing

Hi list, I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. From here [1]: "The out of the box configuration, however, currently uses the nop lock manager plugin". As "lock_manager" is commented in my qemu.conf file, I was

Dear colleagues, I am facing a problem that has been troubling me for last week and a half. Please if you are able to help or offer some guidance. I have a non-prod POC environment with 2 CentOS7 fully updated hypervisors and an NFS filer that serves as a VM image storage. The overall environment works exceptionally well. However, starting a few weeks ago I have been trying to implement virtlock

Hi, I'm trying to build an active/active virtualization cluster using a Ceph RBD as backing for each libvirt-managed LXC. I know live migration for LXC isn't yet possible, but I'd like to build my infrastructure as if it were. That is, I would like to be sure proper locking is in place for live migrations to someday take place. In other words, I'm building things as if I were

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 02:36:27PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Il 28-12-2019 01:39 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > > Hi list, > > I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test > > system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64 > > > > Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks. > > From here [1]:

I have several Qemu/kvm servers running VMs hosted on an NFS share, and am using virtlockd. (lock_manager = "lockd" in qemu.conf) After a power failure, one of the VMs will not start, claiming that it is locked. How do I get out of this? thanks, Steve Gaarder System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA gaarder@math.cornell.edu

Hi Eric, Here is my try to write a quick upstart script for virtlockd. It should be named /etc/init/virtlockd.conf, then : ln -s /lib/init/upstart-job /etc/init.d/virtlockd It seems to work for me : # virtlockd - Locking daemon for libvirt description "virtlockd" start on filesystem and runlevel [2345] stop on starting rc RUNLEVEL=[016] pre-start script test -x

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto: > > virtlockd also uses fcntl(), however, it doesn't have to acquire locks > > on > > the file/block device directly. It can use a look-aside file for > > locking. > > For example a path under /var/lib/libvirt/lock. This means that locks on >

Hi, I've read in the documentation that virtlockd uses SIGUSR1 to dump its state and then re-execs itself. Now I tried it and this seems to fail because virtlockd is being launched without a full path (when using the init script), thus re-exec fails with the error: error : virLockDaemonPreExecRestart:1092 : Unable to restart self: No such file or directory Changing in the init script

Il 06-01-2020 10:06 Peter Krempa ha scritto: > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 14:08:03 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote: >> As above, QEMU's locking is good enough to rely on for file based >> images. Hi Daniel, thank you for the direct confirmation. >> The flaws I mention with libvirt might actually finally be something >> we >> have fixed in 5.10.0 with QEMU 4.2.0,

Hello! Is it possible to disable the virtlockd daemon or VM file locking? I start qemu with a -snapshot option which prevents and changes to the disk image anyways. Using <readonly /> is not supported for IDE disks. Another option would be to not require locking on the NFS share, but i have no idea how. Can someone help me with that? Regards Felix Queißner

Eric, Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html I've seen this hook here : http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/ But it's a hook... Yes, I may try to write a patch. My coding skills are surely not as good as yours but I 'd be glad to make

I just built a 2 node(4 bricks), Distributed-Replicated and everything mounts fine. Each node mounts using GlusterFS client on its hostname (mount -t glusterfs hostname:VOLUME /virtual-machines) When creating a new Virtual Machine using virt-manager it creates the file on the storage, but when trying to power it On, it doesn't work and gives back an error message.(See below. Yes the folder has

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:23:39PM +0000, VONDRA Alain wrote: > I see only qemu-img consumming some CPU and MEM : > > 25897 qemu 20 0 5825976 2,429g 4368 S 5,6 32,2 603:09.34 qemu-kvm That's qemu, not qemu-img. > I have indeed, some nfs errors : > > [475747.296041] nfs: server 192.203.100.247 not responding, still trying > [475747.772022] nfs: server

Hi, On Wed, November 16, 2016 5:15 pm, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:09:56PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > > I'll try to reproduce the issue here, but you can also do > the following command directly on the guest disk image if you > want to test something: > > time LIBGUESTFS_BACKEND=direct guestfish --ro -a fc21-64.qcow2 -i > selinux-relabel

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/07/2013 09:04 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote: > > Eric, > > [please don't top-post on technical lists] > > > > > Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. > > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html

Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:13 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > The default timeout for most OS versions is 30 seconds and the Gluster > timeout is 42, so yes you can trigger an RO event. I get read-only mount within approximately 2 seconds after failed IO. > Though it is easy enough to raise as Pavel mentioned > > # echo 90 > /sys/block/sda/device/timeout AFAIK

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]