similar to: Access to virtualization on a multi-user system

Hello, For a variety of reasons I am interested in a D-Bus interface for libvirt. Primarily for use with http://cockpit-project.org/ for which it would be very easy to write a web interface for libvirt, given a D-Bus interface for libvirt, but writing using the raw libvirt RPC protocol would require writing a new Javascript library for parsing/encoding that protocol. But there are other nice

"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes: > There's nothing in libvirt which auto-creates such resources by default. > > IIRC, it is probably virt-manager and/or GNOME Boxes applications which > are creating them. Ah, in this case it's virt-install, quite right. My mistake. Still, then, what would be best way to have some initial configuration for

Hi, I have a NVidia Quadro NVS450 graphics card with on screen (4800 x 1200 pixels) over three monitors. I use the proprietary NVidia modules to achieve accelerated 2D graphics and display effects. Since about the beginning of 2014, probably related to changes in the X11 or compositing manager, I experience screen lockups lasting from few seconds to several minutes. I therefore would like to

Hi I'm able to run the below command using root permission.... sudo kvm -netdev bridge,br=qbr0ccdca50-fa,id=hostnet -M ppce500 Warning: netdev hostnet has no peer Could not initialize SDL(No available video device) - exiting However when I'm running the same command without root authority,I'm getting following logs... kvm -netdev bridge,br=qbr0ccdca50-fa,id=hostnet -M ppce500

Hi Laine I'm able to run the qemu-bridge-helper but with root authority. I need to run it with non-root user.How can i do that? Thanks On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Laine Stump <laine@laine.org> wrote: > On 06/25/2014 10:22 AM, abhishek jain wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm able to run the below command using root permission.... > > > > sudo kvm

Hi libvirt-user, If I run (as a normal user): virsh -c qemu:///session net-list --all virsh -c qemu:///session pool-list --all I see a default network and a default pool. And indeed, these appear in the persistent configuration. It seems these are created the first time libvirtd is (auto)started in qemu:///session mode. Is it possible to configure the attributes of the default network and

Hi List, I successfully added a new schema to my DCs a couple of weeks ago (and didn't do anything with it yet.) Today I wanted to edit the schema some more but found the samba-tool ldapcmp command and ran it between my two DCs: | * Comparing [SCHEMA] context... | | * Objects to be compared: 1562 | | Comparing: | 'CN=bssGroup,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=bss,DC=example,DC=com'

Greetings! I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on HP-UX 10.20. I've recently started adding WinXP clients to my network. Here's my issue: I installed a WinXP machine on the network. I was able to add a bunch of samba-networked printers to the Xp machine. I recently added 2 new printers to the network. I added the printer names to my samba "printcap" file. I'm able to

I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on HP-UX 10.20. I've recently started adding WinXP (and 2000) clients to my network. Here's my issue: (It seems to effect both the XP & 2000 machines) I installed a WinXP machine on the network. I was able to add a bunch of samba-networked printers to the Xp machine. I recently added 2 new printers to the network. I added the printer names to my

I have changed most of the things, the grub, issues. Since I run a minimal, I dont really have a gnome login screen, all text based (no GUI). The only place I am not able to trace is the booting time screen. Please do see an attached screenshot in this mail On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:17 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > On 11/2/2015 8:35 PM, Ramaseshan S wrote: >

I am kinda getting a tweaked distrubution with CentOS, So this is kinda rebranding. I am not trying to change the hostname, trying to change the System OS name in the on boot screen. I have changed the grub configuration file and it reflects in the Boot OS selection screen, login screen. But only in the on boot screen does it not reflect. My search led me to something called plymouth, and the

As a Systems Administrator, I would like to grant permissions to a certain VM using unix groups. In this example there is a hypervisor with VMs A,B,C,D and there is a group called fortadmins. The solution I am searching forI would just allow fortadmins to use libvirt/virsh commands on VM D. Does libvirt/virsh provide any way to easily accomplish this goal? Regards, Jamie Ian Fargen

hello, in my windows vm i installed qemu-guest-agent and rebootet the vm. In the settings for the vm i set via virt-manager a new channel "unix socket" "org.qemu.guest_agent.0" "virtio". when i try to do a snapshot via shell i get: virsh snapshot-create-as --domain win7new win7new-snap1 --disk-only --atomic --quiesce error: Guest agent is not responding:

On Aug 12, 2015, at 5:22 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > autofs is what's mounting it. But if you turn it off, you'll have to > manually mount anything that's not in /etc/fstab. > > Sounds like gnome's trying to be WinDoze.... Its not ?autofs? specifically (which is a simple thing) but udev talking to udisks, allowing your login session to use udisks to mount the

Mandi! Peter Milesson via samba In chel di` si favelave... > This is post no. 2, with technical information of how I set up the Linux > PCs, and additional information about setting up the server shares. It All this can be placed on wiki, sometking like this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Client_or_Server_to_a_Domain but for linux? Seems complete, to me,

Hi! How can I let recent smbd versions let unix clients access and resolve 'wide' symlinks locally? My goal is that clients may use any kind of symlink (internal and external to a mounted share) like on any other unix-style file system without smbd interfering. My understanding is that since version 3.4.6, smbd effectively denies access of clients to 'wide' symlinks, i.e. out of

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:07:18PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:40:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2018?06?13? 12:24, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > >> > On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > > >

On 29/10/2020 15:22, Daniel Vetter wrote: > So ever since syzbot discovered fbcon, we have solid proof that it's > full of bugs. And often the solution is to just delete code and remove > features, e.g. 50145474f6ef ("fbcon: remove soft scrollback code"). > > Now the problem is that most modern-ish drivers really only treat > fbcon as an dumb kernel console until

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:43:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > > The semantics are that the primary is always used if present in > > preference to standby. > OK. If this is the only semantics of what "standby" refers to in > general, that is fine. > > I just don't want to limit the failover/standby semantics to the > device model specifics, the

I'm having a problem with my XP & 2000 pc's, with printers. During the initial installation and configuration of these machines, everything is fine. But any printer added to the network AFTER the initial config of the winXP & win2000 pc's, isn't available to these machines. So... if I add any printers to my network, I can't use them with my winXP or win2000