similar to: routed network and physical interface

Hi All, Having an issue with xen-4.0-unstable where after completing a live migration, an arp is never sent out to update the switch with the new location of the mac address. Network is configured as per libvirt''s instructions with the xen network-script disabled and the bridge (xenbr0) always up.

CentOS-6.5 i86_64 qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4 MS-Windows v7proSP1 We have installed a MicroSoft Win7 system as a guest and have joined it to our MS AD domain. The system runs and has internet access. However, the IPv4 address it obtains and the gateway it is assigned are both sourced from the virtual machine host system and not from our AD DC DHCP server. To clarify, the virbr0 IP address

Hi, I got this NOTE on most of the link. But I am not getting reason for this. Why someone should not add physical NIC to virbr0. I tried to add my eth1 to virbr0 and it get added. So whether it affects to some functionality of NAT network? -- Sagar Dilip Shedge, Pune. With Regards.

18. Juli 2017 16:45, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: > On 07/18/2017 04:31 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I have upgraded all libvirt packages to version 3.5.0-655.1 and restarted host. > > That wasn't necessary. It's not Windows ;-) > >> This is the current default network config: >> ld4004:~

Hello! I want to SSH from host to specific guest using hostname, e.g. ssh <user>@<guest> or ssh test@vm02-fai ssh to guest using IP works w/o issues. I found Wiki article for "NSS module" (http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/NSS_module), but there are no results for the following commands: ld4004:/home # virsh net-dhcp-leases default Expiry Time MAC address

Hi to everybody, I want create a VPN with some PC clients and only one server, instead of LAN-to-LAN, but I'm not very sure how to do this. For example, I need to have: - Server LAN -------- (192.168.0.1/24) ---- tinc-VPN ---- (192.168.100.1/24) - Client-01 LAN --- (192.168.50.1/24) ---- tinc-VPN ---- (192.168.100.10/24) - Client-02 LAN --- (192.168.80.1/24) ---- tinc-VPN ----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: > I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which > bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? well i don't quite understand bridges and their function, i'm kinda just following directions. br0 replaced eth0 though in my interfaces file according to this guide[1] i

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

Hi, We are running Samba 4.0.9 running on centos 6.5 (64bit) with SecureLinux disabled. Having some share access issues, what are we missing to solve this puzzle? We are attempting to get the MSDFS share working. Until we can fix this we cannot continue. This is the Domain provision and dns, and reverse zone setup. Dhcp server set point all clients at samba as primary dns server. Nslookup

Hi all, I created a two node cluster that manages virtual machines with two servers connected via a cross cable on the network 10.0.0.0/24. I want that machines that runs on different servers in the network 172.16.0.0/24 can see all the others. To make this possible I've configured a vlan on each server: ... ... 5: eth1.111 at eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc

Asterisk version 1.2.14 I use snom190 and xliteV3 as sip phones. asterisk send the rtp stream never to the xlite softphone. Any hits for me? *CLI> rtp debug RTP Debugging Enabled -- Executing Dial("SIP/xlite-007918f0", "SIP/snom") in new stack -- Called snom -- SIP/snom-00797110 is ringing -- SIP/snom-00797110 is ringing -- SIP/snom-00797110 answered

On 12/16/2013 04:47 AM, Gao feng wrote: > On 12/14/2013 10:51 AM, scar wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Gao feng @ 12/12/2013 10:18 PM: >>> I saw there are two bridge br0 and virbr0 in your host. which >>> bridge the libvirt uses? what's result of #virsh net-list ? >> well i don't quite understand bridges

On 11/12/2014 08:21 AM, Sagar Shedge wrote: > Hi, > > I got this NOTE on most of the link. But I am not getting reason for this. > Why someone should not add physical NIC to virbr0. Well, for a start, if you do that then the dhcp server that is running on virbr0 will be exposed to the physical network and begin answering DHCP requests from devices out in the real world. And then you

Hello! I have upgraded all libvirt packages to version 3.5.0-655.1 and restarted host. This is the current default network config: ld4004:~ # virsh net-dumpxml default <network connections='1'> <name>default</name> <uuid>f511d113-d7d1-4714-ad2b-be29ef8f7fc4</uuid> <forward dev='br0' mode='nat'> <nat> <port

inquiry about differences between the tap and the vnet in the virt-manager Greetings! I encounter a problem about the network when using virt-manager to create and run a VM. when I want to establish a network bridge for the guest OS, I generally use two kinds of ways described as fellow : First method : create a bridge with the help of linux commad: brctl, or Second method : using

I''m using xen-3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 on centos 5.2. When I installed centos 5.2 at first time, I could see shared physical device (xenbr0). but after updating virtualization package by yum, it disappeared... connection.py is patched at centos 5.2 release time. so I can''t find out what''s wrong.... bridge configuration is below and it''s normal state.

All, I've set up tinc yesterday (Win32 -> Linux), the connection comes up but I can't reach a host behind the tinc "Server". Maybe I did something completely wrong, so let me first describe my network.... The "Server" has multiple Interfaces, be we just care for two of them here. One NIC "eth2" ist to the LAN (192.168.100.x/24) and the oher one is

Jerry, The 3.2.0 release is reporting this in the log.nmbd [root@beta samba]# cat log.nmbd [2008/07/02 12:26:52,? 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(849) ? nmbd version 3.2.0 started. ? Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2008 [2008/07/02 12:26:52,? 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy [192.168.100.20/24] Other than this issue; no real

Hi All, I have a usage question about netcf. Why netcf can not rename a existing physical interface dynamically by itself? If you have any other method, please share to me, or can we add support for it in netcf? You can see the following steps for details. Version: netcf-0.2.4-1.el6.x86_64 kernel-2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 1. Select a existing NIC from host, for example eth1. [root@rhel6 ~]# ncftool

19. Juli 2017 10:46, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> schrieb: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:23:58AM +0000, c.monty@web.de wrote: > >> 18. Juli 2017 16:45, "Michal Privoznik" <mprivozn@redhat.com> schrieb: >> >> On 07/18/2017 04:31 PM, c.monty@web.de wrote: >> >> Hello! >> >> I have upgraded all libvirt