similar to: Remove Virtual bridge and DNSMASQ

HI Michal Thank you for explaining. I have this situation in a number of production servers where we would always use static IPs for the host and VMs. In such case we have no requirement for NATed network in the future. And we we ever do, we can rely on a DHCP server within the LAN to provide IPs to the VMs. I'll look to remove both libivirt-daemon-driver-network,

On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea? sudo yum search libivirt-daemon-driver-network libvirt-daemon-config-network [sudo] password for bigfoot: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: www.mirrorservice.org * extras: centos.openitc.uk * updates: mirror.mhd.uk.as44574.net Warning: No matches found for:

On 24.04.2015 12:45, mimicafe@gmail.com wrote: > I am running KVM virtualization with libvirtd (libvirt) 0.10.2 in bridged > network mode, however I still have the default virtual network > bridge/interfaces and dnsmasq on the host. What I am trying to understand > is whether or not dnsmasq and the virtual network (*virbr0, Vnet0 and Vnet1*) > still play any role. If not, can I

On 04/24/2015 02:02 PM, mimicafe@gmail.com wrote: > On Centos 6.5 both packages cannot be identified. any idea? > > Yes. CentS 6 uses libvirt-0.10.2 + a ton of backported patches. The splitting of libvirt into a bunch of smaller subpackages so that admins could more easily tailor what was installed on their systems happened [sometime after that, not motivated to look up the exact version

Hi all I recently install Postfix and Dovecot, and so far so good. My assumption was that calendar and address book (similar to Gmail calendar or address book) are part of Dovecot. However I do not see anything concerning them in any of the docs I have read so far. What other software (ideally open source, free) do I need in other to have Calendar and address book so my users can manage their

host and guest both centos 5.5 network is 192.168.62.40 host is setup as follows [root at cloud2 ~]# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:64:12:10:D9 inet addr:192.168.62.199 Bcast:192.168.63.255 Mask:255.255.254.0 inet6 addr: fe80::21a:64ff:fe12:10d9/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:1705488

On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: > > On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>> >

On 10/5/2014 1:56 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > On 04/10/14 21:13, The Cop wrote: >> On 10/4/2014 8:46 PM, Bhasker C V wrote: >>> On 04/10/14 15:36, The Cop wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to assign an IPv6 address to one of my guests. I followed the >>>> following guide, unsuccessfully: >>>> >>

Hi, I am trying to manually install libvirt 1.2.7 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (64bit). I have installed libxml2-dev libgnutls-dev libcurl4-gnutls-dev python-dev, but I am facing dependency issues for libdevmapper libraries. ​ ​Is there any workaround for this dependency​? OR is there any other way to install libivirt 1.2.7 on Ubuntu 12.04. ​ ​Following is the output of the error​ #apt-get install

Well, I found a solution and posted it on the appdb's page of Red Alert 3. http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14371 Here's a copy of the informations I posted on the Red Alert's Appdb webpage : > Thanks to raphael, here's a mini "how to play on LAN to RA3 with Wine + windows users, when the LAN is a VPN" > > My hostname, in

Hello Facing below error while trying to access the iface-list. # virsh iface-list *error: Failed to list active interfaces error: this function is not supported by the connection driver: virConnectNumOfInterfaces* root at kvm-1:/usr/local/src/libvirt# virsh list Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 1 vm1

Hey, I have KVM installed on my Fedora 17 box. I added the network interfaces of the virtual machines to the openvswitch bridge as follows: ____ ____ / VM1\______br0_______/ em1\ \____/ | \____/ | _|_ /VM2\ \____/ virbr0 is the virtual network switch VM1 and VM2 are on the same subnet having tap interfaces vnet0 and vnet1 respectively. em1 is the default

I am running NOX controller with a python script that prints out the destination mac and the source mac for each packet arriving at the now controller and then floods it out. So here's what happening: With em1 connected, all the packets that arrive at em1 are coming to the controller and printing out the details. However, without em1 connected to the OVS, when I have the following setup:

dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C6:C8:2A:04:FD:23 BROADCAST NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 RX

Hi everybody I've a very big network problem with some server running CentOS with KVM and some linux-like VMs on the top of it. The vm's network is bridged with a physical dedicate NIC (an Intel PRO/1000) with 2.4.14-NAPI driver (but the problem persists with various versions of the driver) and the CentOS version is 6.4 (same problem with a 5.7 sever) with all the last updates.

Hi, My local server is running CentOS 7. The machine has two NICs and is acting as a gateway. For DHCP and DNS, I'm using Dnsmasq. I have a strange little problem with local hostname resolution. Before going into more details, here's my configuration. [root at nestor:~] # ifconfig enp2s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.2 netmask

Hi all, I am trying to configure tinc for my network: I have one server with a public /64 IP6 address and one IP4 address, and some other computers with possibly only local addresses (NAT, and router which I don't control) I configured tinc so that all the clients connect by ipv4 to the server with the public address. So I have something like this Ovh (the provider of the server

G'day, I have a host running two kvm guests. One of them gets very poor network performance, testing with iperf I get ~10MBit/sec to guest A, >400MBit/sec to guest B (running iperf between the host/guest). Both guests are using the same bridge: Guest A: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='54:52:00:75:24:91'/> <source

I am running Fedora 16 64bit and installed libvirt. I have the VM running with arm emulation with this one issue I can't figure out. I used Virtual Machine Manager to manage the VM and can access its console there. The Ethernet appears to be eth1 and the guest can set an IP on it etc. However, I cannot see any traffic from the Host when dumping any of the interfaces. I've tried

Greetings, I have two vms, one is a router and the other one is a client, for some reason, the client vm is unable get ip via dhcp from the router vm. here are outputs: vm1.xml: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:54:78:be'/> <source bridge='virbr0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address