Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "Why does libxml2 limit port numbers to 999,999,999?"
2020 Oct 17
1
Re: [xml] Why does libxml2 limit port numbers to 999, 999, 999?
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 06:32:18PM +0200, Nick Wellnhofer wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:24 , Richard W.M. Jones via xml <xml@gnome.org> wrote:
> > It seems like libxml2 chose to do this for convenience rather than
> > correctness.
>
> Yes, this is an arbitrary limit introduced to avoid integer overflow.
>
> > I think it should accept port numbers at least
2017 Dec 12
1
[PATCH] Introduce a wrapper around xmlParseURI.
An alternate solution to:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-December/msg00035.html
"[PATCH] v2v: -i vmx: Allow ssh URLs to use spaces."
is to classify all URLs processed by libguestfs as either ordinary
URLs or the special non-standard URLs that we use for things like
‘virt-v2v -i vmx’ and ‘guestfish --add’.
For the non-standard URLs, provide a wrapper around
2018 Feb 15
0
[PATCH] Introduce a wrapper around xmlParseURI.
We only use xmlParseURI to parse our own "homebrew" URIs, for example
the ones used by guestfish --add or virt-v2v. Unfortunately
xmlParseURI cannot handle URIs with spaces or other non-RFC-compliant
characters so simple commands like these fail:
$ guestfish -a 'ssh://example.com/virtual machine.img'
guestfish: --add: could not parse URI 'ssh://example.com/virtual
2018 Nov 02
0
[PATCH REPOST] Introduce a wrapper around xmlParseURI.
We only use xmlParseURI to parse our own "homebrew" URIs, for example
the ones used by guestfish --add or virt-v2v. Unfortunately
xmlParseURI cannot handle URIs with spaces or other non-RFC-compliant
characters so simple commands like these fail:
$ guestfish -a 'ssh://example.com/virtual machine.img'
guestfish: --add: could not parse URI 'ssh://example.com/virtual
2018 Nov 02
2
[PATCH REPOST] Introduce a wrapper around xmlParseURI.
Previously posted:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-December/msg00046.html
Rich.
2020 Oct 17
0
Re: [xml] Why does libxml2 limit port numbers to 999, 999, 999?
On Oct 17, 2020, at 12:24 , Richard W.M. Jones via xml <xml@gnome.org> wrote:
> It seems like libxml2 chose to do this for convenience rather than
> correctness.
Yes, this is an arbitrary limit introduced to avoid integer overflow.
> I think it should accept port numbers at least up to
> signed int (the type used to store port numbers), and give an error if
> the port
2018 Jan 22
1
[Gluster-devel] configure fails due to failure in locating libxml2-devel
Did you run autogen.sh after installing libxml2-devel?
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Raghavendra G
<raghavendra.hg at gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> # ./configure
> <success lines removed>
> configure: error: libxml2 devel libraries not found
>
> # ls /usr/lib64/libxml2.so
> /usr/lib64/libxml2.so
>
> # ls /usr/include/libxml2/
> libxml
>
> #
2018 Jan 22
1
configure fails due to failure in locating libxml2-devel
All,
# ./configure
<success lines removed>
configure: error: libxml2 devel libraries not found
# ls /usr/lib64/libxml2.so
/usr/lib64/libxml2.so
# ls /usr/include/libxml2/
libxml
# yum install libxml2-devel
Package libxml2-devel-2.9.1-6.el7_2.3.x86_64 already installed and latest
version
Nothing to do
Looks like the issue is very similar to one filed in:
2006 Apr 01
1
libxml2 RPM via yum?
Hi All,
I can't find anything via yum for libxml2. I also, for some reason,
can't get to the source page for libxml2 here,
http://xmlsoft.org/sources/libxml2/
Is there not an RPM via yum for this? Need it for a dependency for
installing PHP from source, which I need to do, for certain reasons. Cheers.
Mark.
2008 Aug 27
1
CESA-2008:0836 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 libxml2 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0836 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0836.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
b9bd68fd5161263814580032fdcd3b1c libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm
2a2107f6e99afd3c0e0cfef742cf2a96 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.x86_64.rpm
2008 Nov 17
1
CESA-2008:0988 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 libxml2 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
d9eb2d4b0e23d818337b428cb140eabc libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm
6aba61ac92595c7647e25fde08cd3344 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64.rpm
2005 Jan 10
3
Installation of XML library can't find libxml2.dll
Sorry to ask a (probably) dumb question, but I am trying to install XML
package on Windows XP, R 2.0.1, and I get the error:
"This application has failed to start because libxml2.dll was not found.
Re-installing the application may fix this problem"
> library(XML)
Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) :
unable to load shared library
2010 Jan 16
1
configure: error: You MUST have the libxml2 (aka gnome-xml) library installed
I need to install application on our Centos5.4 final, every time get this
message
configure: error: You MUST have the libxml2 (aka gnome-xml) library
installed
and I tried to run yum install libxml2
and get this message
Package libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.8.i386 already installed and latest version
Please help
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML
2012 Sep 20
2
RHSA-2012:1288 libxml2 security update for centos6 skiped?
I saw libxml2 have a security update on
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1288.html.
But centos only update libxml2 for centos 5., it also affect centos6.
Centos already update ppid(RHSA-2012:1269), looks like
libxml(RHSA-2012:1288) skiped....
Any explanation?
2008 Aug 27
1
CESA-2008:0836 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 libxml2 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0836 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0836.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9b6e135244e4079824ae1341a30b1fa7 libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm
af041f25eb0535c1fa87702f74aa00be libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.2.3.i386.rpm
2008 Nov 17
1
CESA-2008:0988 Important CentOS 5 i386 libxml2 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0988 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0988.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
c9d9261d1e0b5ce5efe84b307b28d36f libxml2-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm
6f6972d2dee83c7e90bf1232d4b27a8f libxml2-devel-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.i386.rpm
2018 Feb 17
2
Problem installing libxml2 under Homebrew
i am trying to install xml2 from CRAN, and it is throwing an error
that it cannot find the libxml2 library configuration.
The thing is that pkg-config seems to be set up correctly:
$ echo $PKG_CONFIG_PATH
:/usr/local/opt/libxml2/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/opt/libxml2/lib/pkgconfig
$ pkg-config --cflags --libs libxml-2.0
-I/usr/local/Cellar/libxml2/2.9.7/include/libxml2
2010 Mar 25
3
httpd stopped working under SELinux so I had to turn SELinux off. libxml2.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied
Hi.
CentOS 5.4 64-bit with SELinux, happily running for over a year, suddenly
httpd fails to start up, getting an error message like:
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line X of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf:
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp5.so into server: libxml2.so.2:
failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied
I turned off SELinux and was able to start httpd.
But what went
2003 Sep 28
1
Problem with roaming profiles and Samba 3.0
Due to a change in W2K SP4 and XP SP1 (see Microsoft Knowledge Base
Article 327462 at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q327462) Windows
checks the owner of a roaming profile folder when logging in.
For some reason this check fails with Samba 3.0 (at least with our
setup). It works with Samba 2.2.
Any suggestions?
Please CC me. I'm not on the list.
Thanks,
Nick
2004 Jan 02
2
[LLVMdev] libxml2 Test Case?
One of the things I use heavily in conjunction with LLVM is libxml2.
This provides the XML parsing (amongst other things) that I need for my
XPL source language. Since XPL supports XML parsing at runtime, I would
like to be able to compile libxml2 to bytecode and have it undergo
optimization as well.
libxml2 is "C" code, well written and reasonably large. I'm wondering if
it would