similar to: [PATCH common v2 0/4] Windows BitLocker support.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH common v2 0/4] Windows BitLocker support."

2020 Oct 06
2
Re: [PATCH common v2 4/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading >UUIDs and this function will fail. This does not matter here so just >ignore the error. > >Note there is no error message, cryptsetup simply returns with a bad >exit code: > >><rescue> cryptsetup luksUUID /dev/sda2
2020 Oct 07
2
Re: [PATCH common v2 4/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:06:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading >> >UUIDs and this function will fail. This does not matter here so just >> >ignore
2020 Mar 30
6
[PATCH common 0/4] options: Support Windows BitLocker (RHBZ#1808977).
Support transparent decryption/inspection of Windows guests encrypted with BitLocker encryption. This won't make much sense without the associated libguestfs patches which I will post momentarily. (Submodules, ho hum) Rich.
2020 Jan 21
12
[PATCH 0/1] WIP: Support LUKS-encrypted partitions
The following patch attempts to implement sparsification of LUKS-encrypted partitions. It uses lsblk to pair the underlying LUKS block device with its mapped name. Also, --allow-discards was added by default to luks_open(). There are several potential issues that I can think of: 1) If and entire device is encrypted (not just one of more partitions), the lsblk trick might not work. 2) The
2019 Nov 29
8
[PATCH 0/1] Allow UUIDs for --key identifiers.
This combined patch series enables to decrypt LUKS devices on inspection by allowing the UUID of the LUKS device with the --key syntax. I opted for reusing the option instead of adding another one, as I think that device names and UUIDs are different enough that can be properly distinguished. A test for this (patch #4) can be applied only when the patches for common are applied, and the
2020 Oct 06
0
Re: [PATCH common v2 4/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading > >UUIDs and this function will fail. This does not matter here so just > >ignore the error. > > > >Note there is no error message, cryptsetup simply returns
2020 Oct 09
0
Re: [PATCH common v2 4/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 09:25:15AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:06:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:25:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:41:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> >For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading >>>
2020 Jan 22
2
Re: [PATCH] mltools, options: support --allow-discards when decrypting LUKS devices
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:14:38AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: > -val inspect_decrypt : Guestfs.guestfs -> key_store -> unit > +val inspect_decrypt : Guestfs.guestfs -> ?allow_discards:bool -> key_store -> unit > > (** Simple implementation of decryption: look for any [crypto_LUKS] > partitions and decrypt them, then rescan for VGs. This only works > for
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH common v2 4/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading UUIDs and this function will fail. This does not matter here so just ignore the error. Note there is no error message, cryptsetup simply returns with a bad exit code: ><rescue> cryptsetup luksUUID /dev/sda2 ><rescue> echo $? 1 Updates commit bb4a2dc17a78b53437896d4215ae82df8e11b788. --- options/decrypt.c |
2020 Mar 30
9
[PATCH 0/7] Support Windows BitLocker (RHBZ#1808977).
These commits, along with the associated changes to common: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00286.html support the transparent decryption and inspection of Windows guests encrypted with BitLocker encryption. To do the BitLocker decryption requires cryptsetup 2.3.0 (although cryptsetup 2.3 is not required for existing LUKS use). It also requires a new-ish Linux kernel, I
2020 Sep 07
9
[PATCH v2 0/7] Windows BitLocker support.
Original version linked from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808977#c8 There is no change in the code in this series, but feedback from the original series was we shouldn't lose the error message in patch 7. When I tested this just now in fact we don't lose the error if debugging is enabled, but I have updated the commit message to note what the error message is in the
2020 Sep 17
13
[PATCH v3 0/8] Windows BitLocker support.
As discussed in the emails today, this is the third version addressing most points from the v1/v2 review. You will need to pair this with the changes in libguestfs-common from this series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-September/msg00050.html Rich.
2016 Sep 19
6
[PATCH 0/3] add crypto/LUKS support in some OCaml-based tools
Hi, this series refactors some guestfish code (not much), and exposes it via Common_utils, so it is possible to decrypt LUKS partitions when using virt-customize, virt-get-kernel, virt-sparsify, and virt-sysprep. This brings them closer in features with C tools. Most probably a couple more of other OCaml-based tools (virt-v2v to convert encrypted guests, and virt-builder to use encrypted
2020 Jan 27
3
[PATCH v2 1/2] mltools, options: support --allow-discards when decrypting LUKS devices
--- mltools/tools_utils-c.c | 8 ++++---- mltools/tools_utils.ml | 6 +++--- mltools/tools_utils.mli | 8 ++++++-- options/decrypt.c | 5 +++-- options/inspect.c | 2 +- options/options.h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/mltools/tools_utils-c.c b/mltools/tools_utils-c.c index 6c43b8d..1dcebc4 100644 --- a/mltools/tools_utils-c.c +++
2019 Nov 12
4
[PATCH 1/2] options: Fixes and enhancements to --key parsing.
The first patch fixes a rather serious bug, the second patch allows multiple --key parameters and default parameters. There is a third patch to libguestfs which adds a test, coming up. I did not yet review and fix the documentation. I think we need to centralize it in one place because at the moment the same documentation for --key is copy/pasted all over the tools. Rich.
2019 Nov 26
6
[PATCH options v2 0/3] options: Allow multiple and default --key parameters.
v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-November/msg00036.html
2020 Oct 09
3
Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Windows BitLocker support.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 05:02:57PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > Basically what I did was create a small disk, create one partition > over the whole disk, then cryptsetup luksFormat the partition, open > it and format it with a filesystem (without any LVM). That is one > of the things you were adding support for, but it is not limited to > Windows Bitlocker setup, it can just
2018 Sep 19
5
[PATCH 0/2] RFC: --key option for tools
Hi, the following series adds a --key option in the majority of tools: this makes it possible to pass LUKS credentials programmatically, avoid the need to manually input them, or unsafely pass them via stdin. Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): mltools: create a cmdline_options struct Introduce a --key option in tools that accept keys builder/cmdline.ml | 2 +-
2020 Mar 30
0
[PATCH common 3/4] options: Ignore errors from guestfs_luks_uuid.
For BitLocker disks cryptsetup does not (yet? ever?) support reading UUIDs and this function will fail. This does not matter here so just ignore the error. Updates commit bb4a2dc17a78b53437896d4215ae82df8e11b788. --- options/decrypt.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/options/decrypt.c b/options/decrypt.c index 58f8df9..069a83f 100644 ---
2020 Sep 17
2
Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] New APIs: cryptsetup-open and cryptsetup-close.
On Monday, 7 September 2020 11:43:54 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This commit deprecates luks-open/luks-open-ro/luks-close for the more > generic sounding names cryptsetup-open/cryptsetup-close, which also > correspond directly to the cryptsetup commands. > > The optional cryptsetup-open readonly flag is used to replace the > functionality of luks-open-ro. > > The