Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches similar to: "[v2v PATCH] libosinfo: remove auto-cleanup for OsinfoList"
2020 Jan 28
4
[v2v PATCH v2 0/3] Use libosinfo for query device drivers
This patch series integrates libosinfo in virt-v2v to get the list of
files for Windows from libosinfo, if possible. The actual data is still
from virtio-win, just unpacked.
Changes from v1:
- adapt to use the priority in libosinfo 1.7.0+
- filter out non-pre-installable drivers
- collect all the drivers matching the requirements, not just the first,
sorting them by priority like libosinfo does
2020 Jan 22
4
[v2v PATCH 0/3] Use libosinfo for query device drivers
This patch series integrates libosinfo in virt-v2v to get the list of
files for Windows from libosinfo, if possible. The actual data is still
from virtio-win, just unpacked.
Pino Toscano (3):
build: require libosinfo
v2v: add a minimal libosinfo interface
v2v: try to get windows driver files from libosinfo
m4/guestfs-v2v.m4 | 3 +
v2v/Makefile.am | 9 +-
2020 Jun 01
1
[v2v PATCH v2] libosinfo: do not declare OsinfoList auto-cleanup in certain situations
libosinfo changed the way OsinfoList is declared in 1.7.0, however that
was changed back to the old way in 1.8.0; the change was an ABI break,
and made OsinfoList a Module class. Starting from 2.63.3, Module
classes have already auto-cleanup functions declared for them, leading
to double declarations in certain setups.
Hence, do some version check dance to declare the OsinfoList only when
using
2020 Jun 19
1
[v2v PATCH] libosinfo: declare autocleanup funcs with libosinfo < 1.8.0
libosinfo 1.8.0 declares them automatically for all of its classes, so
there is no need to declare ours. This requires fixing the definition of
the IS_LIBOSINFO_VERSION macro to wrap its body in brackets.
While in the process, simplify the workaround for a related bug by
removing a now-useless check.
---
v2v/libosinfo-c.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
2020 Jun 01
1
[v2v PATCH] libosinfo: declare OsinfoList auto-cleanup with glib < 2.63.3
Starting from glib 2.63.3, Module classes have already auto-cleanup
functions declared for them.
Reported by: Kevin Locke.
---
v2v/libosinfo-c.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/v2v/libosinfo-c.c b/v2v/libosinfo-c.c
index 1ab6bb4d..e6827f76 100644
--- a/v2v/libosinfo-c.c
+++ b/v2v/libosinfo-c.c
@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
G_DEFINE_AUTOPTR_CLEANUP_FUNC(OsinfoFilter, g_object_unref)
2020 Jun 01
2
virt-v2v: error: redefinition of 'glib_autoptr_clear_OsinfoList'
Hi All,
I'm attempting to compile virt-v2v 1.42.0 on Debian testing. With gcc
9.3.0, libosinfo 1.7.1, and glib 2.64.2, `./configure && make` fails
on libosinfo-c.c with the following error message:
-8<--------------------------------------------------------------------
In file included from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include/glibconfig.h:9,
from
2014 Jun 10
2
Overload Point for OPUS
Hello,
Can you please tell me what the overload point is for OPUS in dBm0 or dBV?
As an example, the G.711 A law codec has an overload point of +3.14 dBm0
across a 600 ohm circuit.
In ITU-T G.100.1 section 5.8 you can read more about the relationship
between dBm0 and dBov. In that same section you can see that the G.711 A
law, u law, and G.722 codec overload points are also defined.
2020 Jun 01
0
Re: virt-v2v: error: redefinition of 'glib_autoptr_clear_OsinfoList'
On Monday, 1 June 2020 04:17:00 CEST Kevin Locke wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm attempting to compile virt-v2v 1.42.0 on Debian testing. With gcc
> 9.3.0, libosinfo 1.7.1, and glib 2.64.2, `./configure && make` fails
> on libosinfo-c.c with the following error message:
>
> -8<--------------------------------------------------------------------
> In file included
2004 Mar 26
1
AW: RECYCLER
Hi,
yes there is a way. Have a close look at the samba VFS modules.
Vfs objects = recycle
Recycle: repository = .recyclebin_or_whatever_you_want
Recycle: keeptree = yes
With this, everything you delete is going to a directory
.recyclebin_or_whatever_you_want in the share. Ok, it is not the original
recycler of windows, but much better than throwing the files away.
Michael
2005 Jan 24
2
Sound card recommendation?
Can anyone recommend a good high-end sound card to use on a streaming server?
Basically all I need are two channels, a good 96 kHz sampling chip, and it
needs to run on Linux.
--
Jeff Simmons jsimmons@goblin.punk.net
Simmons Consulting - Network Engineering, Administration, Security
"You guys, I don't hear any noise. Are you sure you're
2014 Jun 20
0
Overload Point for OPUS
Hi Marc,
It's not exactly clear how to define the an "overload point" for Opus.
In normal use, it's not a good idea to go beyond the +/- 32767 values
for 16-bit PCM or +/- 1.0 for float. That being said, internally Opus
can represent signals that are up to about 48 dB louder than the PCM
saturation point and if you use the float implementation you can
actually encode and decode
2023 Mar 06
0
[PATCH v4 01/15] vdpa net: move iova tree creation from init to start
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 4:01?PM Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 4:32 AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ? 2023/3/1 15:01, Eugenio Perez Martin ??:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 8:04 AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ? 2023/2/24
1997 Jul 24
0
Security hole in mgetty+sendfax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi,
a security hole has been found in the auxiliary fax scripts "faxq" and
"faxrunq" in the mgetty+sendfax package. It has been in there since
the first day those scripts were written.
Due to improper quoting in these shell scripts, it''s possible to execute
code with a foreign user id, and get root access to the machine. The
2020 Sep 25
20
[RFC PATCH 00/19] vhost-user-rpmb (Replay Protected Memory Block)
Hi,
This is an initial implementation of a vhost-user backend for the
VirtIO RPMB device. The device is currently in the draft of the next
VirtIO specification and describes block device which uses combination
of a key, nonce, hashing and a persistent write counter to prevent
replay attacks (hence Replay Protected Memory Block).
It is implemented as a vhost-user device because we want to