similar to: New Rust bindings for nbdkit

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "New Rust bindings for nbdkit"

2020 Jun 16
4
nbdkit rust plugin: copyright notices, Cargo workspace, and macro hygiene
2020 Jun 15
3
Re: New Rust bindings for nbdkit
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and they > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten them. The new bindings > > aren't backwards compatible, but I doubt that's a problem. Most
2020 Jun 17
2
Re: nbdkit rust plugin: copyright notices, Cargo workspace, and macro hygiene
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 5:23 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > I pushed 2 & 3, thanks. > > But ... > > > From 9fa3e443467e3c06761ec54241327e8daf8701ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:59:53 -0600 > > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add a Cargo.toml file to the top-level
2019 Jul 06
3
Re: [PATCH] Add Rust bindings
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 08:37:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 01:28:12PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: >> > Have you decided whether we need to commit the generated files >> > (Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock)? It looks like in this series those files >> > are still included and not added to .gitignore. >> >> I'm sorry I forgot
2019 Jul 08
2
Re: [PATCH] Add Rust bindings
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: >On Saturday, 6 July 2019 13:03:24 CEST Martin Kletzander wrote: >> Just one thing, the Cargo.toml includes a version under which the crate would be >> published. I presume the version would be the same as the one of the project >> itself, i.e. when releasing libguestfs-x.y.z, we publish guestfs-rs-x.y.z to
2020 Jun 15
1
Re: New Rust bindings for nbdkit
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:11:47AM -0600, alan somers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:04 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic
2020 Jun 17
2
Re: nbdkit rust plugin: copyright notices, Cargo workspace, and macro hygiene
On 6/17/20 6:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I pushed 2 & 3, thanks. > > But ... > >> From 9fa3e443467e3c06761ec54241327e8daf8701ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 16:59:53 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Add a Cargo.toml file to the top-level directory >> >> This is necessary
2019 Feb 08
3
[PATCH nbdkit] Add support for writing plugins in Rust.
This adds very rough support for writing nbdkit plugins in Rust. This is not very idiomatic -- essentially we're handling the direct C calls from nbdkit in Rust. We have to use ‘unsafe’ in a few places because there's no way to tell the Rust code that nbdkit satisfies guarantees (eg. around thread safety, always returning leaked pointers back to the close function, always doing bounds
2019 Aug 11
5
[PATCH 1/2] Rust bindings: Add long description
`cargo doc` will generate docs with long descriptions. I did not add the settings of outputting these docs to `/website`. This is because - by publishing this crate to crates.io, users can see the docs in `docs.rs` like `https://docs.rs/guestfs/<version>/guestfs/`. It is easy to hold multiple documents corresponding to each version. - the style of the documents generated by `cargo doc`
2019 Jul 05
3
Re: [PATCH] Add Rust bindings
> Have you decided whether we need to commit the generated files > (Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock)? It looks like in this series those files > are still included and not added to .gitignore. I'm sorry I forgot adding Cargo.lock to .gitignore. I'll add it to .gitignore. However, I think Cargo.toml should be staged. This is because this is a file managed by hands. It contains
2019 Jun 27
2
Re: [PATCH 3/9] Rust bindings: Add 4 bindings tests
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 05:06:04PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> > > --- > generator/rust.ml | 13 ++++++++--- > run.in | 9 ++++++++ > rust/Cargo.lock | 6 +++++ > rust/Cargo.toml | 4 +--- > rust/tests/010_load.rs
2019 Jun 27
1
Re: [PATCH 3/9] Rust bindings: Add 4 bindings tests
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 06:27:05PM +0900, Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > > I guess this is a stray debug message? > > Yes. I'm sorry... > > > we did *not* check them into git. > > Really? Does it mean that every time you build the library, Cargo.toml is > generated? That's how it has worked in nbdkit. Whether it's right or not I don't know. Normally
2019 Jul 08
2
Re: [PATCH] Add Rust bindings
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:49:55AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: >> >On Saturday, 6 July 2019 13:03:24 CEST Martin Kletzander wrote: >> >>Just one thing, the Cargo.toml includes a version under which the crate would be >>
2019 Jun 11
3
[nbdkit PATCH 0/2] Few rust plugin fixups/nitpicks
There are few more things that could be cleaned up related to the coding style and other things, like explicitly specifying the abi style after "extern" (i.e. `extern "C" fn` instead of `extern fn`), but since those are configurable in rustfmt config, I'm not sure whether the config needs to be added or complying with the defaults should be the priority. But this was just
2020 Jun 15
1
Re: New Rust bindings for nbdkit
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 7:22 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:19:08PM -0600, alan somers wrote: > > The existing Rust bindings for nbdkit aren't very idiomatic Rust, and > they > > are missing a lot of features. So I've rewritten them. The new bindings > > aren't backwards compatible, but I doubt that's a
2023 Aug 30
2
[libnbd PATCH 0/2] (Attempt to) fix Rust on BSD-based builds
I managed to get a build of the async Rust handle compiling on FreeBSD (although the cirrus CI appears to not actually run 'make check' on non-Linux machines, at least when run on my fork): https://gitlab.com/ebblake/libnbd/-/jobs/4985192286 However, I'd really like Tage's review on patch 2 to see if my Rust makes sense. Eric Blake (2): maint: Favor 4-space indent in .rs files
2019 Jul 26
4
Re: [PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
Hi Hiroyuki, sorry for the late reply. Most of the work is definitely nice! There are few notes below, although they are not big issues. I will check this patch once more on monday, especially the rust parts. Otherwise, I'd say that we are close to merging this :) On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 10:37:17 CEST Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura
2019 Jul 23
2
Re: [PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
I found a bug in the bindings, so I fixed it. I'm sorry about sending you the patch many times. Regards, Hiroyuki 2019年7月20日(土) 16:23 Hiroyuki Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com>: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> > > Rust bindings: Add create / close functions > > Rust bindings: Add 4 bindings tests > > Rust bindings: Add
2019 Jul 20
2
Re: [PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
> Is this just trying if the guestfs can be linked with? Yes. In OCaml bindings, there is the corresponding test( https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/ocaml/t/guestfs_010_load.ml). I just mimicked it. If it is not required, I will remove it. divided the generated files and handmade files in rust/src/ directory. I'll send this fixed patch to this mailing list. I'm not
2020 Jun 06
2
[nbdkit] About the Rust bindings
[To continue the conversation from https://github.com/libguestfs/nbdkit/issues/5] > Currently there's no way for the Rust plugin to report an error. The > idiomatic way to do it would be for each callback to return a Result > object, much like how the Go plugin currently does it. I'm sure it's not idiomatic for Rust, but I just wanted to say that there is a way to return an