similar to: [libnbd] More thoughts on callbacks and more

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:08:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > More thoughts on callbacks, etc. following on from: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00184 > > > > Closure lifetimes > > ----------------- Here's a possibly better idea which still

I think I've addressed everything that was raised in review. Some of the highlights: - Callbacks should be freed reliably along all exit paths. - There's a simple test of closure lifetimes. - I've tried to use VALID|FREE in all the places where I'm confident that it's safe and correct to do. There may be more places. Note this is an optimization and shouldn't

This implements most of what I wrote here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/msg00213.html

Patches 1 & 2 are rather complex, but the end result is that we pass closures + user_data + free function in single struct parameters as I described previously in this email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/msg00210.html Patch 3 adds a convenient FREE_CALLBACK macro which seems a worthwhile simplification if you buy into 1 & 2. Patch 4 adds another macro which is

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00231 The changes address everything that Eric picked up in his review of the first two patches. I have also added two more patches (4 and 5) which respectively fix docs and change int status -> unsigned status, as discussed. Passes make, check, check-valgrind. Rich.

As proposed here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/msg00130.html I didn't actually read Eric's replies to that yet because I've been concentrating on writing these patches all day. Anyway here they are and I'll look at what Eric said about the proposal next. Rich.

On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > More thoughts on callbacks, etc. following on from: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00184 > > Closure lifetimes > ----------------- > > Closures could have a lifetime if we had a little bit of support from > the C library. We would generate (from C only): > >

On 7/24/19 7:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are > persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for > the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent > closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as > the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures

Patches 1-4 are basically uncontroversial, straightforward refactoring and IMHO we should just push them. Possibly 1-3 should be squashed together, but I posted them separately so they are easier to review. Patches 5 and 6 together implement OClosure. Patch 5 adds the feature and is simple to understand. Patch 6 changes the Closure completion callbacks into OClosure, but because it doesn't

On 7/24/19 7:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are > persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for > the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent > closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as > the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures

On 8/13/19 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The definition of functions that take a callback is changed so that > the callback and user_data are combined into a single structure, eg: > > int64_t nbd_aio_pread (struct nbd_handle *h, > void *buf, size_t count, uint64_t offset, > - int (*completion_callback) (/*..*/), void *user_data, > +

On 7/22/19 6:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:08:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 07:38:45AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>> More thoughts on callbacks, etc. following on from: >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/thread.html#00184 >>> >>> Closure lifetimes

Previously discussed here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-July/msg00213.html It turns out that deferring callbacks is a PITA. (It would be a bit easier if C has closures.) However by rewriting the example we can avoid the need to use the cookie at all and make it run a bit more efficiently, so let's do that instead. Rich.

For example nbd_set_debug takes a callback function. Previously this was defined explicitly inside the function parameters. This commit defines a new public typedef: typedef int (*nbd_debug_callback) (unsigned valid_flag, void *user_data, const char *context, const char *msg); and then uses the typedef like this: extern int nbd_set_debug_callback

Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures was wasteful as we needed to register a "close callback" to

Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures was wasteful as we needed to register a "close callback" to

Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures was wasteful as we needed to register a "close callback" to

The freeing feature can now be done by associating a free callback with a closure's user_data, so having the valid_flag is no longer necessary and it can be completely removed. This mostly reverts commit 2d9b98e96772e282d51dafac07f16387dadc8afa. --- TODO | 2 - docs/libnbd.pod | 64 ++-------------- examples/glib-main-loop.c |

On 7/25/19 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are > persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for > the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent > closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as > the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures

On 7/24/19 11:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously closures had a crude flag which tells if they are > persistent or transient. Transient closures (flag = false) last for > the lifetime of the currently called libnbd function. Persistent > closures had an indefinite lifetime which could last for as long as > the handle. In language bindings handling persistent closures