similar to: [nbdkit PATCH v2 0/5] structured replies/.extents for nbd plugin

I'm hoping to implement .extents for the nbd plugin; this is a prerequisite. I'm not sure about patch 3 - if we like it, I'll squash it to 2, if we don't, I think we are okay just dropping it. I'm also wondering if we have to worry about malicious plugins that don't populate the entire .pread buffer in an effort to get nbdkit to expose portions of the heap; my patch 7 loses

Patch 1 played with an early draft of Rich's Fedora 30 libnbd package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767#c17 Note that comment 21 provides a newer package 0.1.1-1 with a different API; and that libnbd has more unreleased API changes in the pipeline (whether that will be called 0.2 or 0.1.2); so we'll have to tweak things based on what is actually available in distros.

libnbd-0.1.2-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates-testing, although it was not compiled against libxml2 so it lacks uri support (I ended up testing patch 4 with a self-built libnbd). Diffs since v1 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1 to 0.1.2, add URI support, better timing results Still not done - patch 5 needs associated tests Eric Blake (5): nbd: Check for libnbd nbd:

libnbd-0.1.4-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates testing. Diffs since v2 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1.2 to 0.1.3+, add tests to TLS usage which flushed out the need to turn relative pathnames into absolute, doc tweaks Now that the testsuite covers TLS and libnbd has been fixed to provide the things I found lacking when developing v2, I'm leaning towards pushing this on

With this, I am finally able to get the nbd plugin to do out-of-order responses to the client. Once this series goes in, we should be ready for Rich to cut a release. Eric Blake (4): nbd: Split reading into separate thread nbd: Protect writes with mutex nbd: Enable parallel handling tests: Test parallel nbd behavior plugins/nbd/nbd.c | 217

I'm still working on the interleaving (and Rich reminded me on IRC that we still don't have THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL working anywhere yet, anyways). Since nbdkit doesn't really have a parallel plugin yet, my testing on that front will have to use qemu-nbd as the original server, as well as qemu-io as the driver (qemu-io's aio_read and aio_write commands can be used to trigger

With some crufty sed scripts we can generate functions that map from NBD protocol flags (eg. NBD_CMD_READ) to strings ("NBD_CMD_READ"). This works on GNU sed and with FreeBSD, also with GNU sed's --posix option, so I guess the sed code is POSIX-compatible. Rich.

I ran some local testing on my Fedora 29 system via: $ ./nbdkit memory 1m $ for i in `seq 10`; do ./nbdkit -U - --filter=stats nbd \ statsappend=true statsfile=$file hostname=localhost port=10809 \ --run '~/libnbd/examples/threaded-reads-and-writes $unixsocket' done Pre-patch, the runs averaged 1.266s, 1.30E+08 bits/s Post-patch, the runs averaged 1.154s, 1.42E+08

When we first used libnbd (nbdkit 1.14), it was brand new, so we left in the ability to build a limited nbd plugin without the use of libnbd for comparison. But now that libnbd has had more time under its belt, and we have learned that our nbd-standalone code is not getting much testing, it's time to follow through with our plan to finish off the old code, and now build the nbd plugin only

Now that we properly clean up 'trans' in the reader thread, we must not dereference 'trans' from the write thread at any point after trans has been added to the list unless we have grabbed it back off the list ourselves, or we risk an occasional use-after-free or even double free that valgrind can detect. Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> Fixes:

This is about the simplest implementation of NBD Structured Replies (SR) that we can do right now. It accepts NBD_OPT_STRUCTURED_REPLIES when negotiated by the client, but only sends back the simplest possible SR when required to by NBD_CMD_READ. The rest of the time it will send back simple replies as before. We do not modify the plugin API so plugins are unable to send complex SRs. Also we

Time to enhance the nbd plugin to request structured replies from the server. For now, deal only with structured reads. The server can now return sparse reads, even though we need nbdkit version 3 before we can in turn return sparse reads back to the client. In general, we have to assume the server is malicious, and so we must sanity check that it sends replies we expect. Thus, we have a choice

There's no substantial difference over v1, I simply fixed a few whitespace issues, moved one struct around and tidied up the comments. Rich.

This is only lightly tested (against just qemu NBD client), and the code might be structured a little better as the _negotiate_handshake_newstyle_options function has now grown to be huge. Anyway works for me. Rich.

These are a couple of patches in preparation for the Block Status implementation. While the patches (especially the second one) are very large they are really just elementary code motion. Rich.

This conversion should be feature compatible with the standalone nbd code. Note that the use of libnbd makes the binary for this particular plugin fall under an LGPLv2+ license rather than BSD; but the source code in nbd.c remains BSD. A lot of code simply disappears, now that I'm no longer directly utilizing the NBD protocol files but relying on libnbd. Coordination between threads from

This conversion should be feature compatible with the standalone nbd code. Note that the use of libnbd makes the binary for this particular plugin fall under an LGPLv2+ license rather than BSD; but the source code in nbd.c remains BSD. A lot of code simply disappears, now that I'm no longer directly utilizing the NBD protocol files but relying on libnbd. Coordination between threads from

I'm still playing with ideas on how to split rstate from wstate (so that we can send a request without waiting for POLLIN to complete a pending reply), but this is some preliminary refactoring I found useful. I also fixed a couple of bugs while in the area (already pushed). There's a question of whether we want nbd_handle to be nearly 5k, or if we should instead keep it small and add one

Some of these affect attempts to connect to older qemu-nbd versions, some of them were triggered by manual edits to qemu-nbd source code to provoke various other compliant (if uncommon) server behaviors. Eric Blake (4): starttls: Skip error payload if falling back to unencrypted states: Reject payload to NBD_REP_ACK meta-context: Skip error payload if server lacks meta_context states: Add

The NBD spec was recently patched (nbd.git commit 7827f3ae and friends) to require NBD_OPT_GO for baseline interoperability, with the aim of fewer servers and clients falling back to NBD_OPT_EXPORT_NAME. And since nbdkit as server recently started supporting NBD_OPT_GO (commit f7dd9799), our nbd client as plugin should take advantage of it. This patch is a prerequisite to teaching the nbd plugin