similar to: [supermin PATCH 0/5] rpm: fix package selection w/ multilib

Bind and use rpmvercmp to compare versions of packages when sorting them, instead of an own string-based comparison function. --- src/librpm-c.c | 12 ++++++++++++ src/librpm.ml | 1 + src/librpm.mli | 1 + src/rpm.ml | 2 +- 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c index 1ae3bad..fc847d6 100644 --- a/src/librpm-c.c +++

Fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266918

Hi, this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems. Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point. Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm

Add the package that raised the issue, so it can be used to provide better diagnostic. --- src/librpm-c.c | 15 ++++++++++----- src/librpm.ml | 4 ++-- src/librpm.mli | 2 +- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c index 3bd25a2..75ca4d7 100644 --- a/src/librpm-c.c +++ b/src/librpm-c.c @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ librpm_handle_closed (void) }

Document what each module does, using *.mli files. Remove the --dtb option, it's obsolete. Rename modules according to their purpose. Rich.

Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so the appliance was always considered out out date. Check for the SQLite-based DB first, falling back to the old format. Signed-off-by: Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> ---

openSUSE Leap 15 has "opensuse-leap" as ID in os-release, so add it both in the detection code of the RPM handler, and in test-harder.sh. --- src/ph_rpm.ml | 2 +- tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/ph_rpm.ml b/src/ph_rpm.ml index b0a5eb2..3caa38e 100644 --- a/src/ph_rpm.ml +++ b/src/ph_rpm.ml @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ let

It seems that all the newer versions of openSUSE have an 'opensuse-' prefix in their distro ID; hence, check for that prefix at once, keeping compatibility for the old "opensuse" ID. Followup of commit 0668b2d64abef0724219480a3d7fc16b8dd1e68f. --- src/ph_rpm.ml | 3 ++- tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 21:15:36 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc > > files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for > > --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so > > the

building rpm for mandrake 8.1 gives me this error what should i try? checking for two-argument statfs with struct fs_data (Ultrix)... no checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... no checking whether to build winbind... yes checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no checking whether to use included popt... ./popt checking configure summary configure:

When detecting kernels we have to list the files in the package to find the right /boot/vmlinuz file. In virt-v2v 1.28 we ran: rpm -ql kernel Because multiple kernels can be installed this gave incorrect results, which was reported in RHBZ#1161250 and initially fixed in commit 377bc302f11db3da4263f894c76a7d280fb25dbd. This changed the command to: rpm -ql [epoch:]kernel-version.release

Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >> rpm_is_avaiable verification >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > the new version of the patch is somehow confusing.

Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the

On 04/02/2015 11:47 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2015 11:15:07 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> Hi Pino, >> >> On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>>>> Hi

Hi, I have already asked a similar question twice without response on the r-help list https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-June/200300.html but this list might be more appropriate. If there is a particular reason for the lacking answers (unclear, missing information, the solution is obvious to everyone except me, etc), I would like to know. The description below is generalized, but I

Dear R devels, let's say I have three packages "pkg1", "pkg2" and "pkg3" which all contain new S4 classes and methods. Where "pkg3" depends on "pkg2" and "pkg2" depends on "pkg1". Moreover, all three packages have namespaces. 1) I use ".onLoad <- function(lib, pkg) require(methods)". Do I also have to

Hello, I tried to install guestfish on my Fedora 29 and used the commands from documentation sudo dnf install libguestfs-tools but I got an error when I tried to execute run. You will find below logs below: ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED * output

Hi, I have built two R packages. One of them (PKG1) needs to use the functions of the other package (PKG2). So I need to link these two packages together, so that the functions of PKG2 can be available to PKG1. And when I load one package using 'library("PKG1")', PKG2 can be loaded at the same. Any ideas welcome. -- View this message in context:

I am trying to re-organizing my Makefile for testing my R packages and I am having trouble finding a structure I like. The problem seems to be that "R CMD check", which does wonderful things, does not allow dependency information to flow through very gracefully. That is, since everything is copied into the pkg.Rcheck directory, it is difficult to make any changes to source files without

Hi, few cleanups in the supermin codebase; no actual functional change. Thanks, -- Pino Toscano (3): ext2: simplify tracking of visited modules utils: remove unused run_python function Add and use an helper error function src/build.ml | 20 +++++----------- src/dpkg.ml | 4 +--- src/ext2_initrd.ml | 10 ++++---- src/kernel.ml | 27