similar to: [PATCH nbdkit 0/2] server: Split out NBD protocol code from connections code.

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-February/msg00081.html v2 replaces struct connection *conn = GET_CONN; with GET_CONN; which sets conn implicitly and asserts that it is non-NULL. If we actually want to test if conn is non-NULL or behave differently, then you must use threadlocal_get_conn() instead, and some existing uses do that. Rich.

The third patch is a large but mechanical change which gets rid of passing around struct connection * entirely within the server, preferring instead to reference the connection through thread-local storage. I hope this is a gateway to simplifying other parts of the code. Rich.

There's no substantial difference over v1, I simply fixed a few whitespace issues, moved one struct around and tidied up the comments. Rich.

This is only lightly tested (against just qemu NBD client), and the code might be structured a little better as the _negotiate_handshake_newstyle_options function has now grown to be huge. Anyway works for me. Rich.

None are supported at present, so this always returns an empty list. --- docs/nbdkit-protocol.pod | 4 ++ server/protocol.h | 2 + server/connections.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/nbdkit-protocol.pod b/docs/nbdkit-protocol.pod index 68438fa..4c65e00 100644 --- a/docs/nbdkit-protocol.pod +++

This time around, the numbers are indeed looking better than in v1; and I like the interface better. Eric Blake (2): server: Prefer send() over write() server: Group related transmission send()s server/internal.h | 7 +++- server/connections.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- server/crypto.c | 11 ++++--

Since the v1 series (0/4, at [1]), I've applied patches 1 and 2, rewritten patch 3 [Forbid NUL in export and context names] into patch 4 here, patch 4 there turned into patch 6 here, and everything else here is new. [1]https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00180.html I don't know if there is a handy reusable function for checking whether a string contains valid

Experimental and only very lightly tested so far. Rich.

The first one is the nastiest - it is an assertion failure caused by a spec-compliant client and introduced by our security fix that was released in 1.14.1. Eric Blake (4): server: Fix regression for NBD_OPT_INFO before NBD_OPT_GO server: Fix back-to-back SET_META_CONTEXT server: Forbid NUL in export and context names server: Fix OPT_GO on different export than SET_META_CONTEXT

qemu is about to add 'qemu-nbd --list', which exercises NBD_OPT_LIST and NBD_OPT_INFO to give the user as much detail as possible about an export without actually connecting to it. For that to display more than the export name when nbdkit is the server, we need to implement NBD_OPT_INFO. Thankfully, the NBD spec intentionally made the command very similar to NBD_OPT_GO, to the point that

We should have only one NBD protocol file. Let's make nbdkit's version the canonical one, and use it in libnbd. Rich.

Not sure what version we're up to, but this reimplements extents using the new simpler structure described in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-March/msg00077.html I also fixed most of the things that Eric pointed out in the previous review, although I need to go back over his replies and check I've got everything. This needs a bit more testing. However the

With some crufty sed scripts we can generate functions that map from NBD protocol flags (eg. NBD_CMD_READ) to strings ("NBD_CMD_READ"). This works on GNU sed and with FreeBSD, also with GNU sed's --posix option, so I guess the sed code is POSIX-compatible. Rich.

Updated based on other changes that have happened in the meantime: - rely more on cleanup.h (throughout) - split structured read for easier review (patch 2 and 3 were combined in v1) - rely on nbdkit not leaking a server's partial answer (patch 3) - add tests (patch 5) - other bug fixes I found while testing it - drop EOVERFLOW patch for now; it will be separate once upstream NBD protocol

I'm hoping to implement .extents for the nbd plugin; this is a prerequisite. I'm not sure about patch 3 - if we like it, I'll squash it to 2, if we don't, I think we are okay just dropping it. I'm also wondering if we have to worry about malicious plugins that don't populate the entire .pread buffer in an effort to get nbdkit to expose portions of the heap; my patch 7 loses

I want to post this but mainly for discussion and early review. It's not safe for these patches to all go upstream yet (because not all filters have been checked/adjusted), but if any patches were to go upstream then probably 1 & 2 only are safe. File, VDDK, memory and data plugins all work, although I have only done minimal testing on them. The current tests, such as they are, all

Patch 1 played with an early draft of Rich's Fedora 30 libnbd package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767#c17 Note that comment 21 provides a newer package 0.1.1-1 with a different API; and that libnbd has more unreleased API changes in the pipeline (whether that will be called 0.2 or 0.1.2); so we'll have to tweak things based on what is actually available in distros.

The code handling the NBD protocol was located in the same file as the code handling connections, for not really any reason except historical. This is quite a large code movement which splits out the protocol code into four new files: server/protocol-handshake.c initial handshake server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c " " (newstyle)

libnbd-0.1.2-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates-testing, although it was not compiled against libxml2 so it lacks uri support (I ended up testing patch 4 with a self-built libnbd). Diffs since v1 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1 to 0.1.2, add URI support, better timing results Still not done - patch 5 needs associated tests Eric Blake (5): nbd: Check for libnbd nbd:

I'm not sure exactly which version we're up to, but let's say it's version 4. I'm a lot happier with this version: - all filters have been reviewed and changed where I think that's necessary - can_extents is properly defined and implemented now - NBD protocol is followed - I believe it addresses all previous review points where possible The "only" thing