similar to: [nbdkit PATCH 0/3] Fix %m usage on BSD

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "[nbdkit PATCH 0/3] Fix %m usage on BSD"

2020 Mar 26
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] Create libnbdkit.so
This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203 test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons. This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it
2020 Mar 26
9
[PATCH nbdkit 5/9 patch split 1/5] Create libnbdkit.so.
This is the previous 5/9 patch posted earlier today, split into reviewable chunks. This passes bisection with -x 'make && make check', but I didn't work very hard on the commit messages, so I refer you back to the original patch to explain how it works: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00248.html Rich.
2020 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit 2/9] server: Rename replacement vfprintf function.
As this symbol is never exported from the server, don't call it "nbdkit_vfprintf". Also move it to a new file to make forthcoming changes easier. Fixes commit 1c230358462c349533062eda9e4072054fda0e21. --- server/Makefile.am | 1 + server/internal.h | 14 +++++----- server/log.c | 24 ----------------- server/vfprintf.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2020 Aug 15
3
[PATCH EXPERIMENTAL nbdkit 0/2] Port to Windows using mingw.
The patches following do indeed allow you to compile nbdkit.exe, but it does not actually work yet. I'm posting this experimental series more as a work in progress and to get feedback. Note this does not require Windows itself to build or test. You can cross-compile it using mingw64-* packages on Fedora or Debian, and test it [spoiler alert: it fails] using Wine. Rich.
2020 Mar 24
2
Re: nbdkit / mingw support
On 3/24/20 3:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> (For non-mingw platforms) this breaks the source API promises rather >> seriously, so if I understand your proposal correctly I don't think >> this is a good idea.  It's possibly something we can consider for >> internal plugins, or for the V3 API. > > How does it break API to request that someone link against a
2017 Nov 17
7
[nbdkit PATCH 0/4] thread-safety issues prior to parallel handling
These patches should be ready to go in now; I will also post my work-in-progress for enabling full parallel handling that depends on these, but with that series, I was still getting crashes or hangs with test-socket-activation (I think I've nailed all the crashes I've seen, but the hang is rather insidious; see my other email
2019 Oct 10
1
[PATCH NOT WORKING nbdkit] vddk: Restructure plugin to allow greater parallelism.
We had a query yesterday about the VDDK plugin and making it actually obey the weird "Multithreading Considerations" rules in the VDDK documentation (https://vdc-download.vmware.com/vmwb-repository/dcr-public/8f96698a-0e7b-4d67-bb6c-d18a1d101540/ef536a47-27cd-481a-90ef-76b38e75353c/vsphere-vddk-671-programming-guide.pdf) This patch is my attempt to implement this. The idea is that the
2019 Oct 11
3
[PATCH NOT WORKING nbdkit v2 0/2] vddk: Restructure plugin to allow greater parallelism.
This is my second attempt at this. The first version (also not working) was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-October/msg00062.html In part 1/2 I introduce a new .ready_to_serve plugin method which is called after forking and just before accepting any client connection. The idea would be that plugins could start background threads here. However this doesn't work well in
2020 Mar 23
6
[PATCH nbdkit 0/3] msys2 support for review
I pushed a few of the msys2 patches upstream. I changed the way that $(SHARED_LDFLAGS) works so it's more to my liking, and the others were pushed unchanged. Three patches remain which I'm posting on the mailing list for proper review. Rich.
2017 Jan 27
6
[nbdkit PATCH v3 0/4] bind .zero to Python
This cleans up the existing code base with regards to implicit use of errno from language bindings, then rebases the previous work in python on top of that. I'm still playing with the perl bindings, but got further after reading 'perldoc perlembed'. Eric Blake (4): plugins: Don't use bogus errno from non-C plugins plugins: Add new nbdkit_set_error() utility function python:
2019 Jan 01
7
[PATCH nbdkit v2 0/4] cache: Implement cache-max-size etc.
These are essentially identical to what was previously posted as patches 6/9 through 9/9 here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/msg00145.html except that it has been rebased onto the current git master and retested thoroughly. Rich.
2018 Dec 28
12
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] cache: Implement cache-max-size and method of reclaiming space from the cache.
This patch series enhances the cache filter in a few ways, primarily adding a "cache-on-read" feature (similar to qemu's copyonread); and adding the ability to limit the cache size and the antecedent of that which is having a method to reclaim cache blocks. As the cache is stored as a sparse temporary file, reclaiming cache blocks simply means punching holes in the temporary file.
2018 Jan 23
3
[nbdkit PATCH 0/2] Miscellaneous patches
These are relatively independent enough from my ongoing work to add FUA support that I'll post them now. Eric Blake (2): todo: More items include: Properly decorate attributes in public headers TODO | 15 ++++++++++++++- include/nbdkit-common.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.14.3
2019 Jun 02
5
[nbdkit PATCH v2 0/5] Play with libnbd for nbdkit-nbd
libnbd-0.1.2-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates-testing, although it was not compiled against libxml2 so it lacks uri support (I ended up testing patch 4 with a self-built libnbd). Diffs since v1 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1 to 0.1.2, add URI support, better timing results Still not done - patch 5 needs associated tests Eric Blake (5): nbd: Check for libnbd nbd:
2019 May 30
5
[nbdkit PATCH 0/4] Play with libnbd for nbdkit-add
Patch 1 played with an early draft of Rich's Fedora 30 libnbd package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767#c17 Note that comment 21 provides a newer package 0.1.1-1 with a different API; and that libnbd has more unreleased API changes in the pipeline (whether that will be called 0.2 or 0.1.2); so we'll have to tweak things based on what is actually available in distros.
2019 Jun 12
8
[nbdkit PATCH v3 0/5] Play with libnbd for nbdkit-nbd
libnbd-0.1.4-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates testing. Diffs since v2 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1.2 to 0.1.3+, add tests to TLS usage which flushed out the need to turn relative pathnames into absolute, doc tweaks Now that the testsuite covers TLS and libnbd has been fixed to provide the things I found lacking when developing v2, I'm leaning towards pushing this on
2019 Apr 25
6
[nbdkit PATCH v2 0/5] structured replies/.extents for nbd plugin
Updated based on other changes that have happened in the meantime: - rely more on cleanup.h (throughout) - split structured read for easier review (patch 2 and 3 were combined in v1) - rely on nbdkit not leaking a server's partial answer (patch 3) - add tests (patch 5) - other bug fixes I found while testing it - drop EOVERFLOW patch for now; it will be separate once upstream NBD protocol
2020 Feb 17
5
[nbdkit PATCH v5 0/4] vddk: Drive library loading from libdir parameter.
Differences from v4: Patch 1 is simplified: I realized that since we already use -rdynamic for nbdkit (after all, we WANT our dlopen()d plugins to be able to call our nbdkit_* exports), it is only a matter of adding dlopen to the set of symbols that we export. With that done, there is no separate shared library needed; our dlopen shim is now part of nbdkit proper, and we don't have to tweak
2019 Apr 23
12
[nbdkit PATCH 0/7] Implement structured replies in nbd plugin
I'm hoping to implement .extents for the nbd plugin; this is a prerequisite. I'm not sure about patch 3 - if we like it, I'll squash it to 2, if we don't, I think we are okay just dropping it. I'm also wondering if we have to worry about malicious plugins that don't populate the entire .pread buffer in an effort to get nbdkit to expose portions of the heap; my patch 7 loses
2020 Jun 02
9
[PATCH nbdkit 0/5] vddk: Fix password parameter.
Probably needs a bit of cleanup, but seems like it is generally the right direction. One thing I've noticed is that the expect test randomly (but rarely) hangs :-( I guess something is racey but I don't know what at the moment. Rich.