similar to: [supermin PATCH] rpm: generalize openSUSE support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "[supermin PATCH] rpm: generalize openSUSE support"

2018 Oct 01
2
[supermin PATCH] rpm: support openSUSE Leap 15
openSUSE Leap 15 has "opensuse-leap" as ID in os-release, so add it both in the detection code of the RPM handler, and in test-harder.sh. --- src/ph_rpm.ml | 2 +- tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/ph_rpm.ml b/src/ph_rpm.ml index b0a5eb2..3caa38e 100644 --- a/src/ph_rpm.ml +++ b/src/ph_rpm.ml @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ let
2018 Oct 01
0
Re: [supermin PATCH] rpm: support openSUSE Leap 15
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 01:44:51PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > openSUSE Leap 15 has "opensuse-leap" as ID in os-release, so add it both > in the detection code of the RPM handler, and in test-harder.sh. > --- > src/ph_rpm.ml | 2 +- > tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/ph_rpm.ml
2017 Sep 01
0
[supermin][PATCH] os-release: use ID_LIKE as a fallback for SUSE detection
SUSE distros all have in common suse in ID_LIKE field. The ID field could be varying and is even set to 'Dummy' when building the packages. If the usual values for openSUSE/SLE can't be found in ID, try with ID_LIKE. --- src/os_release.ml | 10 +++++++++- src/os_release.mli | 7 +++++++ src/ph_rpm.ml | 1 + 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git
2017 Sep 01
0
[supermin][PATCH v2] os-release: use ID_LIKE as a fallback for SUSE detection
SUSE distros all have in common suse in ID_LIKE field. The ID field could be varying and is even set to 'Dummy' when building the packages. If the usual values for openSUSE/SLE can't be found in ID, try with ID_LIKE. --- Diff with v1: * Use Utils.string_split rather than too recent String.split_on_char src/os_release.ml | 10 +++++++++- src/os_release.mli | 7 +++++++
2016 Aug 31
8
[PATCH 0/2] supermin: use /etc/os-release
Hi, let's make supermin use /etc/os-release as primary source instead of the various release files in /etc; apparently distros (e.g. openSUSE) are starting removing them. Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): Add simple handling of /etc/os-release Use os-release to detect the distro src/Makefile.am | 3 +++ src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/os_release.ml | 78
2016 Aug 31
0
[PATCH 2/2] Use os-release to detect the distro
Check the ID field in /etc/os-release on the current system, before checking for the other old-style release-/version-like files in /etc. Some distributions (openSUSE Thumbleweed) are starting to remove them, breaking the supermin detection. --- src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/pacman.ml | 5 +++-- src/rpm.ml | 15 +++++++++------ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git
2020 Aug 26
2
[supermin PATCH] rpm: check for SQLite-based RPM DB
Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so the appliance was always considered out out date. Check for the SQLite-based DB first, falling back to the old format. Signed-off-by: Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> ---
2016 Oct 31
0
[PATCH 4/4] rpm: mageia: prefer dnf over urpmi
Mageia introduced dnf as alternative package manager for the next version 6, with the possibility to replace urpmi as primary in the future. As such, prefer dnf over urpmi+fakeroot to download rpm packages. Thanks to Neal Gompa for his heads-up. --- README | 3 +-- src/rpm.ml | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 79fcfd8..679bf70
2020 Aug 27
1
Re: [supermin PATCH] rpm: check for SQLite-based RPM DB
On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 21:15:36 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc > > files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for > > --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so > > the
2019 Apr 12
6
[supermin PATCH 0/5] rpm: fix package selection w/ multilib
This patch series fixes the way supermin sorts the list of installed packages when resolving a name, picking the right package for the host architecture. Pino Toscano (5): rpm: do not unpack parameters rpm: fix version comparison rpm: query the RPM architecture rpm: fix package sorting (RHBZ#1696822) utils: remove unused 'compare_architecture' function src/librpm-c.c | 10
2016 Dec 07
5
[PATCH 0/3] Miscellaneous improvements to supermin.
Document what each module does, using *.mli files. Remove the --dtb option, it's obsolete. Rename modules according to their purpose. Rich.
2016 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/4] supermin: use dnf on Mageia
Hi, as pointed out by Neal Gompa, Mageia recently introduced dnf in the distribution (currently only in Cauldron, which is the future Mageia 6), and most probably it will replace urpmi in the future. As such, on Mageia make supermin prefer dnf over urpmi when found, using the same code already used for Fedora. Related change: make test-harder.sh work explicitly also on Mageia
2017 Jan 10
2
CentOS 7: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
We've just started seeing this. Anyone else? reason: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000b8 component: kernel count: 1 analyzer: vmcore architecture: x86_64 event_log: kernel: 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1484067452 os_release: CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) runlevel: N 3 time:
2020 Aug 26
0
Re: [supermin PATCH] rpm: check for SQLite-based RPM DB
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc > files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for > --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so > the appliance was always considered out out date. > > Check for the SQLite-based DB first,
2016 Sep 05
2
[supermin][PATCH] Fix rpm/zypper detection on openSUSE Tumbleweed
Fix supermins rpm/zypper detection on openSUSE Tumbleweed Newer version of openSUSE does not use /etc/SuSE-release anymore. Search for the new /etc/SUSE-brand in addition. --- diff --git a/src/rpm.ml b/src/rpm.ml index a5dc67a..400efbd 100644 --- a/src/rpm.ml +++ b/src/rpm.ml @@ -39,7 +39,10 @@ let fedora_detect () =  let opensuse_detect () =    Config.rpm <> "no" &&
2012 Jan 17
1
Errors in /var/spool/mail/root
CentOS Experts, I am receiving the following in /var/spool/mail/root. I cleaned out the file and then rebooted and the same errors came back. Is it possible to analyze the data and advise if there is an issue with my system? This is a completely fresh install. From user at localhost.srv.net Tue Jan 17 08:11:56 2012 Return-Path: <user at localhost.srv.net> X-Original-To: root at
2014 Sep 17
4
[PATCH 0/2] supermin: use librpm for rpm support
Hi, this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems. Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point. Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm
2017 Jan 10
0
CentOS 7: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Am 10.01.2017 um 19:51 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: > We've just started seeing this. Anyone else? > > reason: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > 00000000000000b8 > component: kernel > count: 1 > analyzer: vmcore > architecture: x86_64 > event_log: > kernel: 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 >
2019 Jan 29
1
[PATCH] v2v: Fix kernel disambiguation by dropping Epoch field (RHBZ#1669395).
When detecting kernels we have to list the files in the package to find the right /boot/vmlinuz file. In virt-v2v 1.28 we ran: rpm -ql kernel Because multiple kernels can be installed this gave incorrect results, which was reported in RHBZ#1161250 and initially fixed in commit 377bc302f11db3da4263f894c76a7d280fb25dbd. This changed the command to: rpm -ql [epoch:]kernel-version.release
2012 Mar 19
1
ABRT interpretation / guidance needed
Greetings - I have a Centos 6 box fully updated that intermittently sends me an "[abrt] full crash report" email. I am not familiar with these at all and in my limited google search have not found good information to interpret this information. The most recent (and the most frequent one) is listed below, also I have listed the lines from /var/log/messages that correspond to