similar to: [PATCH] daemon: inspect: ignore fstab devs that cannot be resolved (RHBZ#1608131)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] daemon: inspect: ignore fstab devs that cannot be resolved (RHBZ#1608131)"

2017 Nov 21
2
[PATCH REPOST 1/2] common/mlstdutils: Add return statement.
No change, just reposting without the "for discussion" tag. I think we should allow this as it seems like a nice coding style for a limited subset of imperative-style code. Rich.
2017 Nov 05
2
[PATCH 0/2] (mainly for discussion) Add ‘return’ statement.
When rewriting the heavily imperative original inspection code, I longed for a ‘return’ statement so I could keep the new code as close as possible to the original. OCaml of course does not have such a statement, but it's relatively simply to implement it in the language. The first patch does so, and the second patch rewrites a sample of the inspection code to use it. Rich.
2017 Aug 09
0
[PATCH v12 09/11] daemon: Implement inspection of Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.
This is essentially a line-for-line translation of the C inspection code. --- daemon/Makefile.am | 8 + daemon/inspect.ml | 396 +++++++++++++++++++++ daemon/inspect.mli | 41 +++ daemon/inspect_fs.ml | 363 +++++++++++++++++++ daemon/inspect_fs.mli | 23 ++ daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml | 745
2017 Jul 31
0
[PATCH v11 08/10] daemon: Implement inspection of Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.
This is essentially a line-for-line translation of the C inspection code. --- daemon/Makefile.am | 8 + daemon/inspect.ml | 396 ++++++++++++++++++++ daemon/inspect.mli | 41 ++ daemon/inspect_fs.ml | 363 ++++++++++++++++++ daemon/inspect_fs.mli | 23 ++ daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml | 788
2019 Jan 14
1
[PATCH] inspect: fix inspection of partition-less devices (RHBZ#1661038)
When parsing "xdev"-kind devices, do not assume that the partition number can be converted to integer: re_xdev accepts an empty part of the partition number, so just handle as it is, as string. This fixes a regression due to the conversion of the inspection code to OCaml, as the old C version did not have this issue. --- daemon/inspect_fs_unix_fstab.ml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3
2018 Apr 10
9
[PATCH v2 0/5] daemon: generate almall the API OCaml interfaces
Hi, as a followup for the signature fix for mount_vfs [1], here it is a patch series to generate automatically all the OCaml interfaces of daemon actions. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-April/msg00059.html Thanks, Pino Toscano (5): daemon: directly use Optgroups daemon: use the structs from the Structs module daemon: move Lvm.lv_canonical to new Lvm_utils module
2018 Apr 10
0
[PATCH v2 3/5] daemon: move Lvm.lv_canonical to new Lvm_utils module
This way the Lvm module contains only the OCaml implementations of LVM daemon APIs. This is simple refactoring, with no functional changes. --- daemon/Makefile.am | 2 ++ daemon/findfs.ml | 2 +- daemon/inspect_fs_unix_fstab.ml | 2 +- daemon/lvm.ml | 27 ----------------------- daemon/lvm.mli | 10 --------- daemon/lvm_utils.ml
2018 Sep 11
1
[PATCH] daemon: consider /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf while inspecting mountpoints.
From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> Inspection code checks /etc/mdadm.conf to map MD device paths listed in mdadm.conf to MD device paths in the guestfs appliance. However on some operating systems (e.g. Ubuntu) mdadm.conf has alternative location: /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf. This patch consider an alternative location of mdadm.conf as well. --- daemon/inspect_fs_unix_fstab.ml | 13
2013 Jan 22
1
APIs affected by btrfs subvolumes
We have a problem with btrfs subvolumes, as they can hold a filesystem which can be mounted, but aren't describable using only the name of a block device. Specifically they need at least a block device and a subvolume name. There are several APIs which operate on filesystems which currently describe it using only a block device. I've listed them all below. In all cases, these APIs need
2017 Jun 15
0
[PATCH v6 10/41] mllib, v2v: Split out OCaml utils bindings ‘common/mlutils’.
Create a module ‘C_utils’ containing functions like ‘drive_name’ and ‘shell_unquote’ which come from the C utilities. The new directory ‘common/mlutils’ also contains the ‘Unix_utils’ wrappers around POSIX functions missing from the OCaml stdlib. --- .gitignore | 3 + Makefile.am | 24 ++--- builder/Makefile.am
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Aug 09
16
[PATCH v12 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way
2017 Oct 16
2
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] daemon: add split_key_value_strings helper
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Add a simple helper to turn a list of strings into key/value pairs, > splitting by '=', with the possibility to apply a function to unquote > values. > > Add also a simple unquote function. > --- > daemon/utils.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > daemon/utils.mli | 11 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 27
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Oct 16
0
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] daemon: add split_key_value_strings helper
On Monday, 16 October 2017 18:15:38 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:58:10PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Add a simple helper to turn a list of strings into key/value pairs, > > splitting by '=', with the possibility to apply a function to unquote > > values. > > > > Add also a simple unquote function. > > --- > >
2017 Oct 04
11
[PATCH 0/9] build: Require OCaml >= 4.02.
Per my previous email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-September/msg00203.html I'd like to talk about requiring a more modern version of the OCaml compiler. These commits show some of the code changes which would be possible with OCaml >= 3.12 [which it turns out we already require by accident] and also with OCaml >= 4.02. The latter is my favoured option. Rich.