similar to: [PATCH nbdkit] filters: Add caching filter.

I have some patches I'm working on to fix the cache filter. However this is a prelude. It should be simply pure refactoring. All tests pass still. Rich.

This is exactly the same as v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/msg00004.html except that it now frees the bitmap on unload (which the old code did not - there was always a memory leak). Rich.

v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/msg00039.html v2 -> v3: - Fix all the issues raised in Eric's review. - Precompute some numbers to make the calculations easier. - Calculations now use bitshifts and masks in preference to division and modulo. - Clear existing bits before setting (which fixes a bug in the cache filter). Rich.

Eric, you'll probably find the design "interesting" ... It does work, for me at least. Rich.

This patch series enhances the cache filter in a few ways, primarily adding a "cache-on-read" feature (similar to qemu's copyonread); and adding the ability to limit the cache size and the antecedent of that which is having a method to reclaim cache blocks. As the cache is stored as a sparse temporary file, reclaiming cache blocks simply means punching holes in the temporary file.

v4: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-January/msg00032.html v5: - Now we set the block size at run time. I'd like to say that I was able to test this change, but unfortunately I couldn't find any easy way to create a filesystem on x86-64 with a block size > 4K. Ext4 doesn't support it at all, and XFS doesn't support block size > page size (and I

Based on Rich's review of my v1 that touched only cache.c, I have now tried to bring all three filters with alignment rounding in line with one another. There is definitely room for future improvements once we teach nbdkit to let filters and plugins advertise block sizes, but I'm hoping to get NBD_CMD_CACHE implemented first. Eric Blake (2): blocksize: Process requests in linear order

Although the time spent in memcpy/memset probably pales in comparison to time spent in socket I/O, it's still worth worth reducing the number of times we have to utilize a bounce buffer when we already have aligned data. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- filters/cache/cache.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 21

Here's what I'm currently playing with; I'm not ready to commit anything until I rebase my FUA work on top of this, as I only want to break filter ABI once between releases. Eric Blake (2): backend: Rework internal/filter error return semantics filters: Add log filter TODO | 2 - docs/nbdkit-filter.pod | 84 +++++++-- docs/nbdkit.pod

Here's the patch (on top of the preceeding one) which uses a bitmap instead of SEEK_DATA. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org --4VrXvz3cwkc87Wze

The cow and cache filters both use a bitmap mapping virtual disk blocks to status stored in the bitmap. The implementation of the bitmaps is very similar because one was derived from the other when the filters were implemented. The main difference is the cow filter uses a simple bitmap (one bit per block), whereas the cache filter uses two bits per block. This commit abstracts the bitmap

The cow and cache filters both use a bitmap mapping virtual disk blocks to status stored in the bitmap. The implementation of the bitmaps is very similar because one was derived from the other when the filters were implemented. The main difference is the cow filter uses a simple bitmap (one bit per block), whereas the cache filter uses two bits per block. This commit abstracts the bitmap

The cow and cache filters both use a bitmap mapping virtual disk blocks to status stored in the bitmap. The implementation of the bitmaps is very similar because one was derived from the other when the filters were implemented. The main difference is the cow filter uses a simple bitmap (one bit per block), whereas the cache filter uses two bits per block. This commit abstracts the bitmap

Since v1: - rework .can_cache to be tri-state, with default of no advertisement (ripple effect through other patches) - add a lot more patches in order to round out filter support And in the meantime, Rich pushed NBD_CMD_CACHE support into libnbd, so in theory we now have a way to test cache commands through the entire stack. Eric Blake (24): server: Internal hooks for implementing

Patch 1 is the same as last time, except for a minor comment fix. Patch 2 should address everything that Eric mentioned in his review, and has been retested. Rich.

Since v1: add the blocksize filter, add testsuite coverage of the log filter, several fixes to the log filter based on what adding tests revealed I'm still working on FUA flag support patches on top of this; the patches should all be committed in the same release, as we want to minimize the number of releases that cause a filter ABI/API bump Eric Blake (3): backend: Rework internal/filter

After more than a month since v2 [1], I've finally got my FUA support series polished. This is all of my outstanding patches, even though some of them were originally posted in separate threads from the original FUA post [2], [3] [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00113.html [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00219.html [3]

v3 was broken by a bad rebase, so let's forget about that one. Compared to v2: - Patch 1 is the same except for a minor comment change. - Patch 2 splits the reclaim code into a separate file (filters/cache/reclaim.c) - Addressed Eric's comments from his review of v2. - Retested on Linux and FreeBSD.

These are essentially identical to what was previously posted as patches 6/9 through 9/9 here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/msg00145.html except that it has been rebased onto the current git master and retested thoroughly. Rich.

I do have a question about whether patch 2 is right, or whether I've exposed a bigger problem in the truncate (and possibly other) filter, but the rest seem fairly straightforward. Eric Blake (4): server: Check for pthread lock failures truncate: Factor out reading real_size under mutex plugins: Check for mutex failures filters: Check for mutex failures filters/cache/cache.c