similar to: [PATCH 1/1] appliance: init: Avoid running degraded md devices

I have lvm based (thin pool) storage on local disks. I need to move vps from one vg on one disk to another. Does it possible to migrate to localhost with blockcopy migration to another vg? I'm understand that i can move lv from one vg to another, but i don't need that. -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tolstov@selfip.ru jabber: vase@selfip.ru

This is a long shot as it look as though this may not be supported anymore. Since moving to CentOS 7 we have been using the instantiation feature of systemd to run multiple winbind and smb instances on a single server as part of an HA setup (pacemaker/corosync). In testing samba version 4.8 and beyond we have found that this doesn?t work anymore, or rather the client tools are unable to

Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb > by copying over what is on sda > > > sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb > > This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on > rebuilding parts. Once I made sure I retrieved all my data, I followed your suggestion, and it looks

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

Somewhere, mdadm is cacheing information. Here is my /etc/mdadm.conf file: more /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda DEVICE partitions MAILADDR root ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=4 metadata=0.90 UUID=55ff58b2:0abb5bad:42911890:5950dfce ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid1 num-devices=2 metadata=0.90 UUID=315eaf5c:776c85bd:5fa8189c:68a99382 ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid1 num-devices=2

"R Installation and Administration", section 2.5 "Sub-architectures" describes calling specific builds of R using the call "R --arch=name". I am trying to build and install three versions of R-2.9.1, each configured with a different valgrind-instrumentation level ("Writing R Extensions", section 4.3.2 "Using valgrind"). My goal is to be able to

hi all! back in Aug several of you assisted me in solving a problem where one of my drives had dropped out of (or been kicked out of) the raid1 array. something vaguely similar appears to have happened just a few mins ago, upon rebooting after a small update. I received four emails like this, one for /dev/md0, one for /dev/md1, one for /dev/md125 and one for /dev/md126: Subject: DegradedArray

No functional change. --- tests/lvm/test-lvm-filtering.sh | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/lvm/test-lvm-filtering.sh b/tests/lvm/test-lvm-filtering.sh index 0c8b8803a..abb88ae6c 100755 --- a/tests/lvm/test-lvm-filtering.sh +++ b/tests/lvm/test-lvm-filtering.sh @@ -40,22 +40,22 @@ pvcreate /dev/sdb1 vgcreate VG1 /dev/sda1 vgcreate VG2

Hi all, I'm setting up Centos4.2 on 2x80GB SATA drives. The partition scheme is like this: /boot = 300MB / = 9.2GB /home = 70GB swap = 500MB The RAID is RAID 1. md0 = 300MB = /boot md1 = 9.2GB = LVM md2 = 70GB = LVM md3 = 500MB = LVM Now, the confusing part is: 1. When creating VolGroup00, should I include all PV (md1, md2, md3)? Then create the LV. 2. When setting up RAID 1, should I

Generate test-prep.sh using the generator, so the prepared disk types tested are the same as the ones configured in prepopts.ml. --- .gitignore | 1 + fish/test-prep.sh | 35 ----------------------------------- generator/fish.ml | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/fish.mli | 1 + generator/main.ml | 1 + 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) delete mode

I am trying to do a classic R -d valgrind --vanilla < mypkg-Ex.R as described in http://cs.swan.ac.uk/~csoliver/ok-sat-library/internet_html/doc/doc/R/2.9.1/doc/manual/R-exts.html#Using-valgrind The problem is valgrind crashes imediately. I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LST (actually Biolinux) on a 64bit Dell Precision laptop with 4 core-i5 Intel processors. I have R-2-15-0 installed from source

Simplify how we handle lvm.conf.

This adds the mdadm-create API for creating RAID devices, and includes various fixes for the other two patches. Rich.

Hi All, I report new results of dm-ioband bandwidth control test. The previous test results were posted on Jan 25. I've got really good results as well as the last report. dm-ioband works well with Xen virtual disk. I also announce that dm-ioband website has launched. The patches, the manual, the benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it

Hi All, I report new results of dm-ioband bandwidth control test. The previous test results were posted on Jan 25. I've got really good results as well as the last report. dm-ioband works well with Xen virtual disk. I also announce that dm-ioband website has launched. The patches, the manual, the benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it

Hi All, I report new results of dm-ioband bandwidth control test. The previous test results were posted on Jan 25. I've got really good results as well as the last report. dm-ioband works well with Xen virtual disk. I also announce that dm-ioband website has launched. The patches, the manual, the benchmark results and other related information are available through this site. Please check it

Hi, I would know how to plot two variograms on a same graph. I can plot one by one but I would draw both on the same one. Is it possible? Do i need any special package? Thanks! Cordialement Damien Landais

Le 18/02/2015 09:24, Michael Volz a ?crit : > Hi Niki, > > md127 apparently only uses 81.95GB per disk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? [root at nestor:~] # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 232,9G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 3,9G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 3,9G 0 raid1 [SWAP] ??sda2 8:2

On 05/12/2018 05:37, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 04/12/2018 ? 23:50, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: >> In the rescue mode, recreate the partition table which was on the sdb >> by copying over what is on sda >> >> >> sfdisk ?d /dev/sda | sfdisk /dev/sdb >> >> This will give the kernel enough to know it has things to do on >> rebuilding parts. >

Greetings, I would like to know how one can identify if a DomU is PV or HVM? Any docs which may indicate a way to find out? I have a CentOS 5.5 64bit DomU which might be HVM - how can this DomU can be made PV? Just stop the DomU, and then delete it using Virtual Machine Manager and the create another config file for a PV DomU and use xm new and then xm start? Let''s say I have a config