similar to: [nbdkit PATCH 0/2] Better response to bogus NBD_CMD_READ

I want to make my nbd forwarding plugin fully parallel - but to do that, I first need to make nbdkit itself fully parallel ;) With this series, I was finally able to demonstrate out-of-order responses when using qemu-io (which is great at sending back-to-back requests prior to waiting for responses) coupled with the nbd file plugin (which has a great feature of rdelay and wdelay, to make it

I've posted some of these patches or ideas before; but now I'm confident enough with the series that it should be ready to push; at any rate, I can now run test-socket-activation in a tight loop without triggering any crashes or hangs. With this in place, I'm going back to work on making the nbd forwarder wort with the parallel thread model. Eric Blake (8): sockets: Use

The concern is a client is blocked while processing a request. The nbdkit server design requires a thread per request being processed regardless of the number of connections or clients. We want to run 1000's of requests in parallel without needing a thread at nbdkit layer per request in flight. Our plugin layer is built around boost asio and a few threads in a worker pool running an io

These are a couple of patches in preparation for the Block Status implementation. While the patches (especially the second one) are very large they are really just elementary code motion. Rich.

We had several inconsistencies from the NBD spec when diagnosing bad client messages: - FLUSH is not generally forbidden on a read-only export (so failing with EPERM is wrong) [meanwhile, if we don't advertise flush because plugin_can_flush() fails, then rejecting with EINVAL is still okay] - returning EPERM (aka EROFS) for read-only exports should probably take precedence over anything else -

On 4/23/19 10:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If the plugin .pread method did not fill the buffer with data then the > contents of the heap could be leaked back to the client. To avoid > this create a thread-local data buffer which is initialized to zero > and expanded (with zeroes) as required. > > This buffer is shared between pread and pwrite which makes the code a >

Version 1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00144.html Version 2 makes a couple of much larger changes: The OCaml patch changes the API of the pread method so it matches what other language bindings are already doing, ie. get the language plugin to return a newly allocated buffer, check it is long enough, copy out the data. The server patch implements a

This bug was found by Eric Blake. In the .pread method we allocate a buffer in the server and pass it to the plugin. The plugin is supposed to fill it with data. The buffer was uninitialized so initially contained random heap data, but that's OK provided the plugin fully overwrote it with data. All correctly written plugins ought to do this, however there is the possibility of an

In preparation for parallel processing, we need to be sure that two threads belonging to the same connection cannot interleave their I/O except at message boundaries. Add a mutex around all reads and writes that must occur as a group (for now, there is no contention for either mutex). Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- src/connections.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:26:54PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > In preparation for parallel processing, we need to be sure that > two threads belonging to the same connection cannot interleave > their I/O except at message boundaries. Add a mutex around > all reads and writes that must occur as a group (for now, there > is no contention for either mutex). > > Signed-off-by:

----- Forwarded message ----- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:21:19 -0500 Subject: nbdkit async Hello, Hope this is the right person to contact regarding nbdkit design. I have a high latency massively parallel device that I am currently implementing as an nbdkit plugin in c++ and have run into some design limitations due to the synchronous callback interface nbdkit requires. Nbdkit is currently

The code handling the NBD protocol was located in the same file as the code handling connections, for not really any reason except historical. This is quite a large code movement which splits out the protocol code into four new files: server/protocol-handshake.c initial handshake server/protocol-handshake-newstyle.c " " (newstyle)

v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-February/msg00081.html v2 replaces struct connection *conn = GET_CONN; with GET_CONN; which sets conn implicitly and asserts that it is non-NULL. If we actually want to test if conn is non-NULL or behave differently, then you must use threadlocal_get_conn() instead, and some existing uses do that. Rich.

The third patch is a large but mechanical change which gets rid of passing around struct connection * entirely within the server, preferring instead to reference the connection through thread-local storage. I hope this is a gateway to simplifying other parts of the code. Rich.

With some crufty sed scripts we can generate functions that map from NBD protocol flags (eg. NBD_CMD_READ) to strings ("NBD_CMD_READ"). This works on GNU sed and with FreeBSD, also with GNU sed's --posix option, so I guess the sed code is POSIX-compatible. Rich.

Tested via: term1$ qemu-nbd -k $PWD/sock -t -f raw -x foo junk --trace=nbd_\* term2$ ./nbdkit -f -v -e bar nbd socket=$PWD/sock export=foo term3$ qemu-io -t none -f raw nbd://localhost:10809/bar --trace=nbd_\* and checking the traces to see that 'w 0 1' vs. 'w -f 0 1' was able to influence whether the FUA flag showed up at the server in term1. Still to go: figure out how to

This is about the simplest implementation of NBD Structured Replies (SR) that we can do right now. It accepts NBD_OPT_STRUCTURED_REPLIES when negotiated by the client, but only sends back the simplest possible SR when required to by NBD_CMD_READ. The rest of the time it will send back simple replies as before. We do not modify the plugin API so plugins are unable to send complex SRs. Also we

If the plugin .pread method did not fill the buffer with data then the contents of the heap could be leaked back to the client. To avoid this create a thread-local data buffer which is initialized to zero and expanded (with zeroes) as required. This buffer is shared between pread and pwrite which makes the code a little bit simpler. Also this may improve locality by reusing the same memory for

The upstream protocol recently promoted NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES from experimental to a documented extension. Exposing support for this allows plugin writers to create sparse files when driven by a client that knows how to use the extension; meanwhile, even if a plugin does not support this extension, the server benefits from less network traffic from the client. Eric Blake (5): protocol: Support

Slightly RFC, as I need more time to investigate why Unix sockets appeared to degrade with this patch. But as TCP sockets (over loopback to localhost) and TLS sessions (regardless of underlying Unix or TCP) both showed improvements, this looks like a worthwhile series. Eric Blake (2): server: Add support for corking server: Cork around grouped transmission send()s server/internal.h | 3