similar to: minor usability issue: confusing error message with guestmount + fuse errors

Hi I`ve been trying this guestfs_mount_local api for quite a few days, but still can`t get over it. Now it seems to have enter the fuse loop but have some problems with 'mount'? and stops at guestfs_mount_local_run(g). Here`s corresponding code in the test program: ?? if(guestfs_mount_local(g,"/mnt/libg")==-1) exit(EXIT_FAILURE); else guestfs_mount_local_run(g); ?? Below is a

On 10/12/19 9:21 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This program allows you to turn a network block device source into a > FUSE filesystem containing a virtual file: > > $ nbdkit memory 128M > $ mkdir mp > $ nbdfuse mp/ramdisk nbd://localhost & > $ ls -l mp > total 0 > -rw-rw-rw-. 1 rjones rjones 134217728 Oct 12 15:09 ramdisk > $ dd

This program allows you to turn a network block device source into a FUSE filesystem containing a virtual file: $ nbdkit memory 128M $ mkdir mp $ nbdfuse mp/ramdisk nbd://localhost & $ ls -l mp total 0 -rw-rw-rw-. 1 rjones rjones 134217728 Oct 12 15:09 ramdisk $ dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1M count=128 of=mp/ramdisk conv=notrunc,nocreat 128+0 records in 128+0 records out

Hello all, I'm running a 64bit Centos5 setup and am trying to mount a gluster filesystem (which is exported out of the same box). glusterfs --debug --volfile=/root/gluster/webspace2.vol /home/webspace_glust/ Gives me: <snip> [2009-08-11 16:26:37] D [client-protocol.c:5963:init] glust1b_36: defaulting ping-timeout to 10 [2009-08-11 16:26:37] D [transport.c:141:transport_load]

Hey guys, I am running gluster over infiniband, and I have a couple of questions. We have four servers, each with 1 disk that I am trying to access over infiniband using gluster. The servers look like they start okay, here are the last 10 or so lines of a client log (they are all identical): 2008-10-07 07:18:40 D [spec.y:196:section_sub] parser: child:stripe0->remote1 2008-10-07 07:18:40 D

Fix compilation failure on F17 --- fuse/guestmount.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fuse/guestmount.c b/fuse/guestmount.c index 7c5e0af..379346f 100644 --- a/fuse/guestmount.c +++ b/fuse/guestmount.c @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include <getopt.h> #include <signal.h> +#include <locale.h> /* We're still using some of FUSE to

guestmount.c: In function 'main': guestmount.c:899: error: implicit declaration of function 'setlocale' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] guestmount.c wasn't including locale.h. --- fuse/guestmount.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fuse/guestmount.c b/fuse/guestmount.c index b4a917f..27a4cef 100644 --- a/fuse/guestmount.c +++

The full description of this bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838592 and the effect it has on OpenStack is described here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835466#c9 Rich.

Hello, I have a setup similar to Rweb ( http://www.math.montana.edu/Rweb/ ): I get R scripts from users and need to execute them in in a safe manner (they are executed automatically, without human inspection). I would like to limit the user's script to reading from STDIN and writing to STDOUT/ERR. Specifically, preventing any kind of interaction with the underlying operating system (files,

* PATCH FOR DISCUSSION ONLY - NOT TO BE APPLIED * Colin suggested something which seems eminently sensible: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=916780 I've been through a couple of rounds of trying to implement this. I started with adding the option as suggested to the guestmount program, but it tended to make the guestmount program more complex. More importantly, adding the option

Hi, Apparently, guestmount -o allow_other -a "/path/to/raw_file" -m /dev/sda1 "/path/to/mountfolder" is much slower than kpartx -av "/path/to/raw_file" mount /dev/mapper/loop0p1 /path/to/mountfolder (Doing lots of read/write inside the image.) I thought guestmount "only" scripts the above. Seems I was wrong on that. I am currently using

Hi all, I am trying to mount on boot a sshfs filesystem. I have tried this in /etc/fstab backup at myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup fuse.sshfs nonempty,allow_other 0 2 but only works when network works. I have also tried this in my crontab: @reboot sshfs -o idmap=backup myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup but doesn?t seem to work either. What else can I try?

On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 02:53:05AM +0000, Patrick Schleizer wrote: > Hi, > > Apparently, > > guestmount -o allow_other -a "/path/to/raw_file" -m /dev/sda1 > "/path/to/mountfolder" > > is much slower than > > kpartx -av "/path/to/raw_file" > mount /dev/mapper/loop0p1 /path/to/mountfolder > > (Doing lots of

This version doesn't crash or cause hung processes or stuck mountpoints, so that's an improvement. Rich.

This patch is just for review. It enables FUSE support in the API via two new calls, 'guestfs_mount_local' and 'guestfs_umount_local'. FUSE turns out to be very easy to deadlock (necessitating that the machine be rebooted). Running the test from the third patch is usually an effective way to demonstrate this. However I have not yet managed to produce a simple reproducer that

This changes the proposed API slightly. Previously 'mount-local' generating a 'mounted' event when the filesystem was ready, and from the 'mounted' event you had to effectively do a fork. Now, 'mount-local' just initializes the mountpoint and you have to call 'mount-local-run' to enter the FUSE main loop. Between these calls you can do a fork or whatever

Hi folks, I research at the moment a connection over fuse and samba for hadoop-cluster. Its my private playground, but I have some issues I can't figure out why they happen. I use RHEL5.7, packetlist: rpm -qa|grep samba samba-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64 samba-common-3.0.33-3.29.el5_7.4.x86_64 2 servers, one provides samba-shares and one I use as client. Samba-Server (HOST2): FuseFS:

Hi Are there any caveats to changing the max_read fuse mount option that's hardcoded into xlators/mount/fuse/src/fuse-bridge.c to something other than 128k? On my client test system, cat /proc/mounts shows: fusectl /sys/fs/fuse/connections fusectl rw,relatime 0 0 10.10.10.11 /storage fuse.glusterfs rw,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072 0 0 This

Hi! I'm using the ntfs-3g module for my portable USB hard drive on Centos 5.4. When I plug it into my centos box it mounts fine, but its owned by root and nobody but root has permission to write to it. I've been perusing the ntfs-3g and fuse man pages (and other docs) and they all seem to say that the default settings should be to allow RW access to everyone. but that isn't what

On 24/09/2020 12:47, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > I am using it on Fedora with Volume Definition looking like this: and I use this: <volume fstype="cifs" ??????? server="CIFS_SERVER_FQDN" ??????? path="linprofiles" ??????? mountpoint="/mnt/%(USER)" options="username=%(USER),uid=%(USERUID),gid=%(USERGID),domain=%(DOMAIN_NAME)"