Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] builder: templates: For RHEL, CentOS >= 7 and all Fedora, default to GPT."
2017 Nov 07
1
Re: [PATCH] builder: templates: For RHEL, CentOS >= 7 and all Fedora, default to GPT.
On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 17:35:51 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> The immediate issue is with Fedora/ppc64 and /ppc64le which currently
> use extended partitions, breaking the virt-builder ‘--size’ parameter,
> eg:
>
> $ virt-builder --arch ppc64le fedora-26 --size 20G
> ...
> [ 21.6] Resizing (using virt-resize) to expand the disk to 20.0G
> virt-resize:
2017 Oct 17
0
[PATCH] builder: templates: For RHEL, CentOS >= 7 and all Fedora, default to GPT.
The immediate issue is with Fedora/ppc64 and /ppc64le which currently
use extended partitions, breaking the virt-builder ‘--size’ parameter,
eg:
$ virt-builder --arch ppc64le fedora-26 --size 20G
...
[ 21.6] Resizing (using virt-resize) to expand the disk to 20.0G
virt-resize: error: /dev/sda5: partition not found in the source disk image
(this error came from '--expand' option
2017 Dec 20
4
virt-customize error
Hi,
I´m need to customize a debian qcow image, but I have this error virt-customize: error: no operating systems were found in the guest image
The command that I´m trying is:
virt-customize -v -x -a ./kvm_av_4_4_n0.qcow2 --attach ./one_context/packages.iso -root-password password:acens --run ./ctpd/pro/scripts/one_altavault.sh --firstboot-command "dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server
I attach
2013 Sep 23
12
balance induced csum errors
SAMSUNG SSD 830 Series
CPU0: Intel® Core(TM) i7-2820QM CPU @ 2.30GHz (fam: 06, model: 2a, stepping: 07)
8GB RAM (quite heavily tested, not recently, with several days of memtest)
kernel 3.11.1-200.fc19.x86_64 running on baremetal
btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20130308git704a08c-1.fc19.x86_64
Today I did a scrub on a btrfs volume, with no message or errors in console or dmesg or journal. Immediately after
2007 Oct 23
3
xfs problems with xen3.1 on domu
Have amd64 xen 3.1 installed on debian etch.
Have all the domu file systems in lvm.
Problem 1
If I have a xfs files system when I mount it on domu I get this error:
Filesystem "sda5": Disabling barriers, not supported by the underlying
device
XFS mounting filesystem sda5
Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda5
If I mount with nobarriers the message goes away.
If I mount under
2009 Oct 27
7
LVM+Xen+FreeNAS possible?
Hi All,
We''ve limitation of 500 GB per server as per ServerLoft.
we are needing to store word/pdf files. We are planning to use following
setup.
/dev/sda1 - boot - ext2
/dev/sda2 - swap
/dev/sda3 - dom0 - ext3
/dev/sda4 - LVM - one LV for each domU, We''re planning 3 DomUs.
/dev/sda5 - FreeNAS. Is that possible? Can it be in one of the LVs under 4th
partition?
Currently, one
2008 Sep 30
3
Problem using Xen - SATA
Hi,
I have an Slackware 12.1 running on Intel Core2Quad, 4 Gb RAM. (The result
of dmesg is attached on this e-mail)
I have downloaded ''Xen 3.3.0 official source distribution tarball'' from
www.xen.org. Run make world, make install. Have no errors.
Installed GRUB correctly and added the following lines on menu.list:
title Xen 3.3
root (hd0,1)
kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem = 262144
2011 Jan 28
3
Transitioning from multi-boot to Xen
I am looking into setting up Xen 4.0 on a simple dual-boot
Windows/ubuntu laptop with the following partitions:
| Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
| /dev/sda1 * 1 223 1782784 7 HPFS/NTFS
| /dev/sda2 223 21713 172624888 7 HPFS/NTFS
| /dev/sda3 35854 38914 24576344 7 HPFS/NTFS
| /dev/sda4
2007 Apr 11
3
Relocating /boot and /
Due to the peculiar way that my root drive is configured (incomplete advance
planning for Windows to Linux conversion), I have had thoughts about moving
/boot and / to a different place on the drive. Current configuration is:
sda1 - 30Gb primary partition (was the E: drive)
sda2 - 120 Gb primary partition (was my H: drive)
sda3 - 100Mb /boot primary partition
sda4 - Extended partition
sda5 - 4Gb
2006 Aug 06
2
partion
hi all,
i have reinstalled linux i kept free 17 gb space.
i have created 4gb partition by fdisk with LVM options.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 1275 10241406 7
2006 Aug 06
2
partion
hi all,
i have reinstalled linux i kept free 17 gb space.
i have created 4gb partition by fdisk with LVM options.
fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 40.0 GB, 40060403712 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4870 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 1275 10241406 7
2011 Jun 03
1
Booting Linux from Windows
Hello,
because of Windows' hibernation bug I want to boot Linux using the
Windows boot manager. I followed this guide:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/wiki/index.php/Windows_BCD but unfortunately
only "Boot error" is shown when I try to boot Linux.
Layout of the disk looks like this:
/dev/sda1 * 0+ 16- 17- 131072 83 Linux (Linux
boot partition)
/dev/sda2 16+
2014 Jan 21
2
syslinux and btrfs-formatted dos/MBR partition
Hello Gene, thanks for your reply.
Yes BIOS mode. The config wants a menu, which loads fine under ext4
and not under btrfs. Under btrfs I have also tried to remove the
syslinux.cfg file altogether (which should trigger the boot: prompt if
I am not mistaken) and the result is the same: only the copyright line
appears and no prompt.
The three letter sequence is EDD.
The disk is 160GB, here is the
2014 Jan 29
2
Status of R/W UFS
Is r/w to a UFS partition using 'guestmount' still an impossibility?
From everything I've found, it seems to be something that is not
possible at the moment. I was just wondering if that has changed or if
there are plans to change that?
Here is the issue I'm experiencing:
~# guestmount --rw -a ${disk_path}/${disk_name} -m /dev/sda4
/tmp/freebsd-master
libguestfs: error:
2015 May 08
1
Re: [PATCH 00/10] virt-resize: add support for resizing MBR logical partitions
On 04/30/2015 06:51 PM, Chen, Hanxiao wrote:
> Hi, Rich
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Richard W.M. Jones [mailto:rjones@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 7:04 PM
>> To: Chen, Hanxiao/陈 晗霄
>> Cc: libguestfs@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH 00/10] virt-resize: add support for resizing MBR
>> logical partitions
2003 Apr 18
2
kjournald panic in 2.4.20 RedHat 7.2
Hi, If this is a redundant post I apologize. I am running 2.4.20 on what has been
a very stable Athlon machine for months, tried to move a 2 GB file from an ext2
partition to an ext3 and kjournald crashed. Here are the last reminants of my
shell scrollback:
[*ROOT* mofo /mnt/sda1/mysql/fd 641 ] ll oldmail/
total 2363288
-rw-rw---- 1 mysql mysql 2147483647 Jan 23 18:04 maillog.MYD
2019 Sep 25
3
Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver
Hello,
today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the
new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module.
Error-message from dkms:
Compiler version check failed:
The major and minor number of the compiler used to
compile the kernel:
gcc version 8.3.1 20190311 (Red Hat 8.3.1-3) (GCC)
does not match the compiler used here:
cc (GCC)
2020 Sep 01
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Seems there were a couple of correlated failures that appear to be flakes
on this buildbot recently:
green:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13974
red:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13975
(target-override.c
during stage 1, seems to be missing the directory/symlink it just created)
red:
2013 Mar 16
1
different size of nodes
hi All,
There is a distributed cluster with 5 bricks:
gl0
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.1T 1.5T 75% /mnt/brick1
gl1
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.3T 1.3T 78% /mnt/brick1
gl2
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda4 5.5T 4.1T 1.4T 76% /mnt/brick1
gl3
Filesystem Size Used
2020 Sep 02
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Well, I am at my wit's end. I have copied over the script and directories
for this test case and run it a few million times. First I was running one
at a time, then I switched to kicking off 1000 at a time. All the while,
the bots continued to run on the same machine. The script never failed even
once. I am not sure if this has something to do with Python as part of
llvm-lit or what is going