similar to: [supermin][PATCH] os-release: use ID_LIKE as a fallback for SUSE detection

SUSE distros all have in common suse in ID_LIKE field. The ID field could be varying and is even set to 'Dummy' when building the packages. If the usual values for openSUSE/SLE can't be found in ID, try with ID_LIKE. --- Diff with v1: * Use Utils.string_split rather than too recent String.split_on_char src/os_release.ml | 10 +++++++++- src/os_release.mli | 7 +++++++

It seems that all the newer versions of openSUSE have an 'opensuse-' prefix in their distro ID; hence, check for that prefix at once, keeping compatibility for the old "opensuse" ID. Followup of commit 0668b2d64abef0724219480a3d7fc16b8dd1e68f. --- src/ph_rpm.ml | 3 ++- tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

openSUSE Leap 15 has "opensuse-leap" as ID in os-release, so add it both in the detection code of the RPM handler, and in test-harder.sh. --- src/ph_rpm.ml | 2 +- tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/ph_rpm.ml b/src/ph_rpm.ml index b0a5eb2..3caa38e 100644 --- a/src/ph_rpm.ml +++ b/src/ph_rpm.ml @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ let

On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 01:44:51PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > openSUSE Leap 15 has "opensuse-leap" as ID in os-release, so add it both > in the detection code of the RPM handler, and in test-harder.sh. > --- > src/ph_rpm.ml | 2 +- > tests/test-harder.sh | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/ph_rpm.ml

On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:25:17AM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: > All SUSE distros have a ID_LIKE=suse, including the fake one used > for building that has a ID=Dummy value. Without reading ID_LIKE > on SUSE distros, the generated appliance packagelist is not correct. > > This fix reads ID_LIKE as a fallback if ID contains nothing. > --- > m4/guestfs_appliance.m4 | 10

On Thursday, 20 July 2017 16:21:40 CEST Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: > In the appliance used to build the packages for openSUSE, os-release > is super minimal and only had ID_LIKE=suse. The code setting the > DISTRO variable only searches for ID variable so far, resulting in > invalid packagelist on openSUSE. > > This fix reads ID_LIKE as a fallback if ID contains nothing. > ---

On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 10:59 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 11:25:17AM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: > > All SUSE distros have a ID_LIKE=suse, including the fake one used > > for building that has a ID=Dummy value. Without reading ID_LIKE > > on SUSE distros, the generated appliance packagelist is not correct. > > > > This fix reads

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 17:01 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday, 20 July 2017 16:21:40 CEST Cédric Bosdonnat wrote: > > In the appliance used to build the packages for openSUSE, os-release > > is super minimal and only had ID_LIKE=suse. The code setting the > > DISTRO variable only searches for ID variable so far, resulting in > > invalid packagelist on openSUSE.

All SUSE distros have a ID_LIKE=suse, including the fake one used for building that has a ID=Dummy value. Without reading ID_LIKE on SUSE distros, the generated appliance packagelist is not correct. This fix reads ID_LIKE as a fallback if ID contains nothing. --- m4/guestfs_appliance.m4 | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/m4/guestfs_appliance.m4

Hi, let's make supermin use /etc/os-release as primary source instead of the various release files in /etc; apparently distros (e.g. openSUSE) are starting removing them. Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): Add simple handling of /etc/os-release Use os-release to detect the distro src/Makefile.am | 3 +++ src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/os_release.ml | 78

Check the ID field in /etc/os-release on the current system, before checking for the other old-style release-/version-like files in /etc. Some distributions (openSUSE Thumbleweed) are starting to remove them, breaking the supermin detection. --- src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/pacman.ml | 5 +++-- src/rpm.ml | 15 +++++++++------ 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git

Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so the appliance was always considered out out date. Check for the SQLite-based DB first, falling back to the old format. Signed-off-by: Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> ---

On Wednesday, 26 August 2020 21:15:36 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc > > files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for > > --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so > > the

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:57:43PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Fedora 33 switched the DB of RPM to SQLite, so no more Packages/Name/etc > files. Because any missing file exception is ignored when checking for > --if-newer, the lack of the Package files was not properly noticed, so > the appliance was always considered out out date. > > Check for the SQLite-based DB first,

In the appliance used to build the packages for openSUSE, os-release is super minimal and only had ID_LIKE=suse. The code setting the DISTRO variable only searches for ID variable so far, resulting in invalid packagelist on openSUSE. This fix reads ID_LIKE as a fallback if ID contains nothing. --- m4/guestfs_appliance.m4 | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

This patch series fixes the way supermin sorts the list of installed packages when resolving a name, picking the right package for the host architecture. Pino Toscano (5): rpm: do not unpack parameters rpm: fix version comparison rpm: query the RPM architecture rpm: fix package sorting (RHBZ#1696822) utils: remove unused 'compare_architecture' function src/librpm-c.c | 10

Mageia introduced dnf as alternative package manager for the next version 6, with the possibility to replace urpmi as primary in the future. As such, prefer dnf over urpmi+fakeroot to download rpm packages. Thanks to Neal Gompa for his heads-up. --- README | 3 +-- src/rpm.ml | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 79fcfd8..679bf70

We've just started seeing this. Anyone else? reason: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000b8 component: kernel count: 1 analyzer: vmcore architecture: x86_64 event_log: kernel: 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 last_occurrence: 1484067452 os_release: CentOS Linux release 7.3.1611 (Core) runlevel: N 3 time:

Almost forgot Domain controller(raspbian lite): NAME="Raspbian GNU/Linux" VERSION_ID="10" VERSION="10 (buster)" VERSION_CODENAME=buster ID=raspbian ID_LIKE=debian HOME_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/" SUPPORT_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianForums" BUG_REPORT_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianBugs? Domain member(ubuntu-server):

On a fully patched C7 machine... % cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) % cat /etc/os-release NAME="CentOS Linux" VERSION="7 (Core)" ID="centos" ID_LIKE="rhel fedora" VERSION_ID="7" PRETTY_NAME="CentOS Linux 7 (Core)" ANSI_COLOR="0;31" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:centos:centos:7"