Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "Important virt-resize fix"
2020 Jun 09
5
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the Fedora
R packages rebuilt against R 4.0 in rawhide (in the F33-R-4 side tag). With
the exception of R-biomaRt, R-BSgenome, R-GenomicAlignments, and
R-rtracklayer, I believe everything is built and updated to the latest
versions. And of those packages, they're all ready to go when Fedora
infrastructure is working reliably
2017 Nov 20
2
virt-builder resize error
Hi,
I was trying out virt-builder and noticed that in some directories I
receive an error when the image is resized.
For example, if I run the following command from my home directory it works
fine:
virt-builder rhel-7.4 --size 10G --output test.img
If I run the same command from /tmp or /vms (my default libvirt pool), I
see the following in my verbose output:
virt-resize '--verbose'
2016 Sep 01
2
status of virt-resize support for xfs?
Hey there everyone!
Trying to use virt-builder to download & resize the standard fedora-23
image from libguestfs.org ...
??[rsawhill at jiop 11:50 ~] {0} $ rpm -q libguestfs-tools
> libguestfs-tools-1.32.7-1.fc23.noarch
> ??[rsawhill at jiop 11:50 ~] {0} $ virt-builder --list | grep fedora-23
> fedora-23 x86_64 Fedora? 23 Server
> fedora-23 i686
2017 Nov 21
4
Re: virt-builder resize error
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 20 November 2017 22:57:04 CET David Kaylor wrote:
> > I was trying out virt-builder and noticed that in some directories I
> > receive an error when the image is resized.
> >
> > For example, if I run the following command from my home directory it
> works
>
2009 Dec 25
5
[Bug 25795] New: windows not redrawn after resize
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25795
Summary: windows not redrawn after resize
Product: xorg
Version: 7.4
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2016 Sep 01
0
Re: status of virt-resize support for xfs?
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:55:50AM -0400, Ryan Sawhill wrote:
> Hey there everyone!
>
> Trying to use virt-builder to download & resize the standard fedora-23
> image from libguestfs.org ...
>
> ??[rsawhill at jiop 11:50 ~] {0} $ rpm -q libguestfs-tools
> > libguestfs-tools-1.32.7-1.fc23.noarch
> > ??[rsawhill at jiop 11:50 ~] {0} $ virt-builder --list | grep
2017 Nov 21
0
Re: virt-builder resize error
On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 15:36:02 CET David Kaylor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:55 AM, Pino Toscano <ptoscano@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday, 20 November 2017 22:57:04 CET David Kaylor wrote:
> > > I was trying out virt-builder and noticed that in some directories I
> > > receive an error when the image is resized.
>
2017 Nov 21
0
Re: virt-builder resize error
Hi,
On Monday, 20 November 2017 22:57:04 CET David Kaylor wrote:
> I was trying out virt-builder and noticed that in some directories I
> receive an error when the image is resized.
>
> For example, if I run the following command from my home directory it works
> fine:
>
> virt-builder rhel-7.4 --size 10G --output test.img
>
> If I run the same command from /tmp or
2020 Jul 14
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 01:19, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 11 July 2020 11.32.32 WEST Jos? Ab?lio Matos wrote:
> > If I do not hear until then I will push the update Monday night (Western
> > Europe time zone.
>
> Well I tried but I did not succeeded both using the web interface and cli
> interfaces:
>
>
2020 Jul 07
3
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 12:38, Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> On Monday, 6 July 2020 21.08.53 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> > R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to
> > build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now.
> >
> > Tom
>
> I have re/built them using the side tag but I do not
2005 Mar 07
2
Threaded logging?
Is the logging system thread-safe? I have a process that takes about 5
hours, and twice, it has stopped, giving me no errors at all... but the
process hasnt been finished... The second time, I loaded the status
page, and it gave me a 500 error, at the same time the process stopped.
I have a sneaking suspicion that the cause is two processes trying to
write to the log-file at the same
2017 Feb 17
2
Plan for libguestfs 1.36
Libguestfs 1.34 was released on 2016-08-08, which is about 6 months
ago. I'd would like to think about what needs work for the next
stable 1.36 release, which might happen at the end of this month.
Any new APIs added in the 1.35 cycle will become supported and
guaranteed when we release 1.36, so we need to check those. See:
git diff v1.34.0 -- generator/actions.ml
It looks like there
2005 May 10
8
fastcgi approach?
I''ve just had a problem with fastcgi killing processes off while they
were running (I have a long-running background process)... but it took
me a while to track it down and pinpoint that fastcgi was asking the
process to quit. So i was thinking if it would be a good idea to tweak
the way ruby-fastcgi handles this.
At the moment, in fcgi.rb (part of the fcgi gem) there is
2020 Jul 06
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
R-BiocFileCache is now branched for f32 (finally). You should be able to
build it if/when the PDC comes back up. Lotta random outages right now.
Tom
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jos? Ab?lio Matos <jamatos at fc.up.pt> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 03.40.52 WEST Tom Callaway wrote:
> > Over the last several days, I've been working hard to get all of the
> Fedora
>
2019 Apr 11
2
postgis-2.0.7-2.el7 still in epel7-testing?
Hi all,
I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in
postgis-2.0.7-2.el7.
However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e
Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can
it be
2011 Jul 27
3
Reorganize(stack data) a dataframe inducing names
Dear Contributors,
thanks for collaboration.
I am trying to reorganize data frame, that looks like this:
n1.Index Date PX_LAST n2.Index Date.1 PX_LAST.1
n3.Index Date.2 PX_LAST.2
1 NA 04/02/07 1.34 NA 04/02/07 1.36
NA 04/02/07 1.33
2 NA 04/09/07 1.34 NA 04/09/07
2014 Oct 08
0
[PATCH V5 3/4] resize: support resize extended partition
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
resize/resize.ml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/resize/resize.ml b/resize/resize.ml
index fc622ba..80a37e2 100644
--- a/resize/resize.ml
+++ b/resize/resize.ml
@@ -749,12 +749,33 @@ read the man page virt-resize(1).
start_overhead_sects +^
2014 Sep 26
0
[RFC PATCH v4 7/7] resize: support resize extended partition
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
This patch doesn't pass `make -C resize check`. The error message is:
virt-resize: error: There is a deficit of 512 bytes (512). You need to
make the target disk larger by at least this amount or adjust your resizing
requests.
I spent hours but can't found the reason. please help! I'll send the
complete log later.
2020 Jun 24
8
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Thanks, Jos? and Elliott. I can help with reviews.
I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in
order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that
generates it. Hope it helps.
I?aki
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Elliott Sales de Andrade
<quantum.analyst at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend.
>
> Also,
2016 Jul 05
4
R-3.3.1 RPM release
Hi All,
I have installed on a RHEL 5.7 server the recent R-3.3.0 rpm but I would like to upgrade to the latest now available R-3.3.1 . I have not found so far the rpm, I would like to know if and when it will be available?
Thanks in advance,
Cris
This e-mail is confidential and may also contain privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to read,