similar to: Finding the run script to execute virt-sysprep or other commands

Hi , I have installed the libguestfs-1.35.19 after running ./configure it says configure: error: supermin >= 5.1 must be installed, your version is too old but ubuntu14.04 trusty has the latest version as 4.1.6-1 as given here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/supermin The configure as a result was not successful and the run file not generated yet.

Hi, (please note the mailing list is libguestfs@redhat.com, and -owner@ is the address of the mailing list administrators.) On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 13:02:29 CET Aditya Suripeddi wrote: > I want to avail the virt-cusomize , virt-sysprep and other > commands for configuring of my vm instances on my ubuntu14.04 machine . > Installing the libguestfs-1.24.9 has generated 2

Hi, On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 18:30:18 CET Aditya Suripeddi wrote: > I have downloaded the tar file of libguestfs. There is a run.in > file , is this the script described in README file which I have to run to > get started without installing the libguestfs ? To use libguestfs as built but not installed, you need to build libguestfs before, i.e. `./configure` first and

while # sudo nautilus i get this : root at static-16 aditya]# sudo nautilus No protocol specified Could not parse arguments: Cannot open display: [root at static-16 aditya]# please resolve. Also what does the "static-16" denote? -- -Aditya Mamidwar

Hi Stefanos, Thanks for your comments. I added both as reviewer. > One question though. Are you sure that this: > This helps with LICM when instructions inside a conditional is loop invariant  > is not achieved with the current LoopRotate pass? Because AFAIK, it does. Basically it inserts > a guard (that branches to the preheader) and then passes like LICM hoist invariant

I triend the command make all-gold -k But the error message that it says now is: /usr/binutils/gold/system.h:38:11:fatal error: 'libintl.h' file not found #include <libintl.h> On Saturday, May 30, 2015, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Aditya, > > Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its > documentation. For

FYI, The LLVM Performance Workshop will be held at CGO 2017. The workshop is co-located with CC, HPCA, and PPoPP. If you are interested in attending the workshop, please register at the CGO website: http://cgo.org/cgo2017/workshops.html When: Saturday February 4th, 2017 Where: Austin, Texas, USA ---- Hi, CGO workshop and tutorial organizers, This is a friendly reminder that early

the symlink ld is already pointing to /usr/bin/ld. Also -fuse-ld=gold does not works on clang in freebsd. I am not sure where is the problem?should I remove /usr/bin/ld and create a new symlink to /usr/local/bin/ld.gold? Regards Aditya Verma Junior Undergraduate IDD Computer Sc & Engg IIT(BHU), Varanasi(UP) On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at

Dear Aditya, Regarding the error, it looks like binutils is trying to build its documentation. For your project, this is a step that you can skip. You can try using "make -k" to skip over errors and proceed to the "make install" step. That might work. As an aside, you should include the error as a plain text attachment instead of taking a graphic screenshot. The error

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03 AM Aditya K via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The splitting pass currently doesn’t move cold symbols into a separate > section. Is that affecting your results? > Maybe partly, the main reason is that, in the absence of good profile > info, we aren't finding many cold blocks. > We noticed that the split cold functions

Hi, Thanks for the response. On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:06 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > From what input? Usually Clang is the tool for "rewriting C" (making > source to source conversions), but it's not clear if that's what you are > trying to achieve, so some more information would be useful. > I have successfully generated AST

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 3:46 PM Vedant Kumar <vedant_kumar at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > On Feb 5, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:03 AM Aditya K via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > The splitting pass currently doesn’t

Dear all, When making a plot with the command plot(xVector, yVector), there are many points that collide on the same place in the plot. In order to make this plot clearer, I have been looking for a way to colour the points based on the number of points that fall onto each other. If only one point falls on a particular location, make it gray, if many points fall, make it black. I tried to search

Dear, How do I tell Emacs to update to the new R version I installed? It still loads the old R version. I already updated the the system path, but that didn't seem to work. Thanks for your help, Aditya -- Aditya Bhagwat [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

The splitting pass currently doesn’t move cold symbols into a separate section. Is that affecting your results? On Darwin, we plan on using a symbol attribute to provide an ordering hint to the linker (see r352227, N_COLD_FUNC). vedant > On Jan 28, 2019, at 10:51 AM, Aditya K via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Very happy to see good results. On our side, we are

Hi, Aditya, I took a look but I was hoping for a simpler example. And something that is more "usual". As Florian mentioned, these branches are on undefs. But thank you. Best, Stefanos Στις Δευ, 23 Μαρ 2020 στις 1:16 μ.μ., ο/η Florian Hahn < florian_hahn at apple.com> έγραψε: > > > > On Mar 21, 2020, at 23:13, Aditya K via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at

Hello Tobias, Thank you for the suggestion! Aditya also mentioned this. I will look into it. Best regards, Ruijie Ruijie Fang Email: ruijief at princeton.edu On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:48 PM Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> wrote: > Hello Ruijie, > > One other workload that would be interesting to test might be clang > itself. Building clang with PGO information is a

Hi aditya, There are two ways to cound the number of predecessors for each basic block. You can generate the control flow graph using the CallGraphScc pass with the granularity of basic block and can simply traverse the graph bottom up till the root. The number of nodes encountered would be the number of predecessors. The second way would be to use the special ;preds marker in the llvm IR. Each

hi, I had an implementation of loop-rotation that peels the loop such that each conditional is executed at least once. https://reviews.llvm.org/D22630 This helps with LICM when instructions inside a conditional is loop invariant. The patch has decent number of test cases. All the requested comments were addressed at that time. I'm happy to rebase and put the patch again. -Aditya

Hi, I tried creating intrinsics which are to be placeholders for a set of instructions which should not be executed by the backend. I want to retain only intrinsic,phi and terminator instructions in a basic block. I have taken care of the external dependencies of basic block. How do I delete the rest of the instructions? Thank You Aditya P.S: