similar to: [PATCH] builder: run/schedule a SELinux relabel if needed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] builder: run/schedule a SELinux relabel if needed"

2016 Nov 28
2
[PATCH] builder: Rearrange how template-building scripts work.
Create a new directory (builder/template). Integrate all of the scripts into a single program, so that templates are generated more consistently. This also changes how the index file is generated. The script now generates the index file fragment and saves it under version control, and then generates the final index file by concatenating these. (Previously the index was written by hand which was
2016 Jul 13
6
[PATCH 0/5] Fix SELinux
We can use the setfiles(8) command to relabel the guest filesystem, even though we don't have a policy loaded nor SELinux enabled in the appliance kernel. This also deprecates or removes the old and broken SELinux support. This patch isn't quite complete - I would like to add some tests to the new API. I'm posting here to garner early feedback. Rich.
2016 Jul 14
10
[PATCH v2 0/7] Fix SELinux
v1 -> v2: - Add simple test of the setfiles API. - Use SELinux_relabel module in virt-v2v (instead of touch /.autorelabel). - Small fixes. Rich.
2013 Feb 04
0
How to connect to console of domain on PowerPC?
Hi, I tried to use libvirt to run KVM/QEMU on Freescale PowerPC platforms. So far there's only one serial device (spapr-vty) defined in QEMU to work as console for IBM PSeries platform. There's no serial device support in QEMU for Freescale PowerPC (ePAPR). libvirt/src/qemu/qemu_command.c /* This function generates the correct '-device' string for character * devices of each
2013 Jan 31
0
There's no output when connecting to console of domain on PowerPC
Hi, I tried to use libvirt to run KVM/QEMU on Freescale PowerPC platforms. So far there's only one serial device (spapr-vty) defined in QEMU to work as console for IBM PSeries platform. There's no serial device support in QEMU for Freescale PowerPC (ePAPR). libvirt/src/qemu/qemu_command.c /* This function generates the correct '-device' string for character * devices of each
2009 Jan 28
3
vm ignores kickstart
Hi, I''m trying to use a kickstart file to install VMs on a Scientific Linux 5.2 (repackaged RHEL52) host, but the install process seems to ignore my kickstart file. The command I''m using is: virt-install -n sl4vm01 --ram=1024 --vcpus=1 --os-type=linux --os-variant=rhel4 --extra-args="ks=http://particle.phys.uvic.ca/~fransham/ks.cfg" --paravirt --nographics
2015 Mar 05
0
[PATCH] builder: add build script for PPC64 Fedora
--- builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) create mode 100755 builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh diff --git a/builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh b/builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..1e22eba --- /dev/null +++ b/builder/website/fedora-ppc64.sh @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +#!/bin/bash - +# virt-builder +#
2019 Sep 25
3
Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver
Hello, today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module. Error-message from dkms: Compiler version check failed: The major and minor number of the compiler used to compile the kernel: gcc version 8.3.1 20190311 (Red Hat 8.3.1-3) (GCC) does not match the compiler used here: cc (GCC)
2020 Sep 01
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Seems there were a couple of correlated failures that appear to be flakes on this buildbot recently: green: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13974 red: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage/builds/13975 (target-override.c during stage 1, seems to be missing the directory/symlink it just created) red:
2020 Sep 02
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Well, I am at my wit's end. I have copied over the script and directories for this test case and run it a few million times. First I was running one at a time, then I switched to kicking off 1000 at a time. All the while, the bots continued to run on the same machine. The script never failed even once. I am not sure if this has something to do with Python as part of llvm-lit or what is going
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html already lists %T as "parent directory of %t (not unique, deprecated, do not use)". See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D35396 On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:37 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think I'd be up for considering deprecation of %T due to the risk > of race conditions/conflicts between tests. %t
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Sure. I didn't use lit or ninja. I simply copied the script produced by lit (/home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-multistage-test/clang-ppc64le-multistage/stage1/tools/clang/test/Driver/Output/target-override.c.script) into a temporary directory (along with a deep copy of the build directory). I modified the paths in the script to point to the temporary directory. Then I ran the script in a loop. For
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
I think that was maybe the discussion on https://reviews.llvm.org/D78245 On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 6:22 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I have a vague memory that libcxx wanted it for something, and claimed it > would be hard to work around not having it. > > Anyone else remember that? I can’t dredge up the details, sorry… > > In any event, a separate
2018 Apr 05
6
[PATCH v3 0/3] v2v: improve OVF in OVirt flavour
Hi, v3 of these patches: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-April/msg00002.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-April/msg00006.html Thanks, Pino Toscano (3): v2v: OVF: improve get_ostype mappings v2v: OVF: write ovirt:id attribute for the OS in OVirt flavour v2v: OVF: fix ovf:id for VirtualSystem in OVirt flavour v2v/create_ovf.ml | 253
2016 Jan 26
2
Problems with test on ppc
Bill, For some reason the llvm-symbolizer tests fail on ppc: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux/builds/182/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/stdio because it can't be started: /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-test/clang-ppc64le/stage1/./bin/llvm-symbolizer: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by
2015 May 19
4
[PATCH v4 0/2] inspector: recognize ppc64 and ppc64le archs (RHBZ#1211996)
Patch extracts MSB/LSB info from /bin/file output and passes it as separate parameret from elf_arch. Then it is sent to impl_file_architecture and checked/ Modified magic_for_file to handle regex changes. Now with tests for file_architecture. Fixes: RHBZ#1211996 Maros Zatko (2): inspector: recognize ppc64 and ppc64le archs (RHBZ#1211996) tests: ppc64 and ppc64le for file_architecture
2020 Sep 03
3
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
Should be fixed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D87103 Shall we consider deprecating(emitting a warning)/removing %T from lit? lldb, lld/COFF and clang-tools-extra are the three major users of %T. There are a few other %T in other places but there are not too many. We will also investigate whether other projects using lit are using %T. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:25 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at
2020 Sep 03
2
Flakey failure on clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
This is likely due to a race condition (%T is a shared parent directory). I'll put up a patch to fix it. On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:00 AM David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Is the machine running any jobs in parallel? Would it be worth trying running lit in the loop, rather than the script? (perhaps lit's doing something interesting) or maybe the
2018 Jul 12
3
[PATCH 0/7] PowerPC64 performance improvements
Hi Brian, > Thank you for this collection of patches. > > How can I test them? What platforms (computers) have the ppc64 or > POWER9 processor? The IBM Bounty Source page has a list of resources: https://www.bountysource.com/teams/ibm/bounties Travis also has ppc64le support, so if you add the linux-ppc64le target then FLAC will be tested on ppc64le. Thanks, Anton
2016 Jun 12
2
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness
I threw all the sanitizers I had access to on this test and didn't find anything. The merging uses threads so I can't rule out nondeterminism. It's strange that it only happens on ppc64le and only on stage 2, so an actual miscompile wouldn't surprise me either. On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > Also, `Clang Tools ::