similar to: Re: Cubietruck: QEMU, KVM and Fedora

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:59:47PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > root@cubietruck:~# /usr/bin/libguestfs-test-tool -V > > libguestfs-test-tool 1.30.6 [...] > > [00633ms] /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm \ > > -global virtio-blk-device.scsi=off \ > > -nodefconfig \ > > -enable-fips \ > > -nodefaults \ > > -display none \ > >

Hi, i am using on my machine Postfix with Cyrus_SASL in smtpd.conf i have saslauthd as method used,but even if i have it , this is what postfix writes into log messages Dec 13 00:02:03 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17833]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied Dec 13 00:08:07 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17856]: auxpropfunc error invalid parameter supplied Dec 13 00:08:07 sx1 postfix/smtpd[17858]: auxpropfunc

Hello , i want all my log messages from python to have in /var/log/python Now they are in /var/log/messages: Jun 9 12:10:51 sx1 kernel: klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jun 9 12:11:01 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [it] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:11:02 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [research] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:12:01 sx1 python: MM_MEMBERS [it] Nothing to do. Jun 9 12:12:01 sx1 python:

> > $ qemu-arm -cpu ? > > Available CPUs: > > arm926 arm946 arm1026 arm1136 arm1136-r2 arm1176 arm11mpcore > > cortex-m3 > > cortex-a8 > > cortex-a8-r2 cortex-a9 cortex-a15 ti925t pxa250 sa1100 sa1110 > pxa255 pxa260 > > pxa261 pxa262 pxa270 pxa270-a0 pxa270-a1 pxa270-b0 pxa270-b1 xa270- > c0 > > pxa270-c5 any > > >

Hello guys, I do not know how it is posible : *vi /etc/postfix/main.cf* # INTERNET HOST AND DOMAIN NAMES # # The myhostname parameter specifies the internet hostname of this # mail system. The default is to use the fully-qualified domain name # from gethostname(). $myhostname is used as a default value for many # other configuration parameters. # #myhostname = host.domain.tld myhostname =

Hi Eduardo, All I can say is that the timings you have are a bit odd. What optimizations options are you using (I suggest -O3)? Also, perhaps you can try --enable-arm4-asm just in case. I've had the encoder running in real-time on a chip that's at least twice slower than yours with the settings you're using. Jean-Marc Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 ? 16:23 -0400, Eduardo Bezerra a

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:59:33PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:48:04PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:02AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:53:41AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > On 9 December 2014 at 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:

Hi, I just realized that clang produces Thumb-2 instruction in code even when older CPU type which doesn't suport Thumb-2 is specified. Here is output: # /opt/llvm/bin/clang -S -ccc-host-triple arm-unknown-freebsd -mcpu=arm926ej-s -mfloat-abi=soft -v -o rrx.S rrx.c clang version 3.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git 98138cdfdee05c0afbab2b209ce8cfe4a52474e1) Target: arm-unknown-freebsd Thread

[[this bounced first, because it has 'help' in the Subject line ... -- Martin Maechler ]] I am a complete novice R programmer. (Though I know C quite well) I am trying to write some R code to do the following simulation. There is a 2-frame "movie" of noise and signal dots. the noise dots have random positions in each frame. The signal dots are placed randomly in frame 1,

Install the gmp package, run your code, and then try this: bu <- gmp::as.bigq(u) bs4 <- bu[1] + bu[2] + bu[3] + bu[4] + bu[5] s4 <- as.double(bs4) s1 - s4 ## [1] 0 s2[[2]] - s4 ## [1] 7.105427e-15 s3 - s4 ## [1] 7.105427e-15 identical(s1, s4) ## [1] TRUE `bs4` is the exact sum of the binary rationals in your `u` vector; `s4` is the closest double precision to this exact sum.

Hi, I tried the same options suggested in your post and the problem continues. What do you suggest? 2005/9/15, Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@usherbrooke.ca>: > Hi Eduardo, > > All I can say is that the timings you have are a bit odd. What > optimizations options are you using (I suggest -O3)? Also, perhaps you > can try --enable-arm4-asm just in case. I've had the

Hi all, I'm trying to use libspeex 1.1.10 on an ARM926EJ-Sid(wb) rev 3 (v5l). I executed the speexenc and speexdec test files and they can encode and decode. But I'm getting 95% of cpu utilization on the codification and 44% on the decodification. I saw in the post: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2005-June/003485.html that this version of speex works fine on ARM

My simple functions were to compare the result with the gfortran compiler sum() function. I thought that the Fortran sum could not be less precise than R. I was wrong. I am impressed. The R sum does in fact match the result if we use the Kahan algorithm. P. I am glad to see that R sum() is more accurate than the gfortran compiler sum. On 16/03/18 11:37 AM, luke-tierney at uiowa.edu wrote:

rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8 passes as much as on a GK208, and xv appears to work. Very lightly tested. Instead of sticking coordinates into pushbufs, the vertex shader is modified to read them from a constbuf, indexed by vertex id. This approach could be used for all nvc0 generations, but I didn't want to rock the boat. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> ---

Looks reasonable, some minor comments below. On 10/16/2016 02:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8 passes as much as on a GK208, and xv appears to > work. Very lightly tested. > > Instead of sticking coordinates into pushbufs, the vertex shader is > modified to read them from a constbuf, indexed by vertex id. This > approach could be used for all nvc0 generations,

Hey All, I use nut on my Cubietruck some time now together with a APC USV and everything works great including auto-shutdown. Now I got a second Cubietruck and this one has a Li-ion battery connected directly to the board. The data can be read out by "normal" Linux options, e.g.: cat /sys/class/power_supply/battery/capacity for the current loading level and such. My question is now

Hi all, I found a discrepancy between the sum() in R and either a sum done in C or Fortran for vector of just 5 elements. The difference is very small, but this is a very small part of a much larger numerical problem in which first and second derivatives are computed numerically. This is part of a numerical method course I am teaching in which I want to compare speeds of R versus Fortran (We

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:48:04PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:02AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:53:41AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On 9 December 2014 at 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Booting a minimal KVM guest throws the below error on Cubietruck: >

Hello, I am trying to compile Speex on RealView Compiler and a lot of errors are indicated by compiler: libspeex\bits.c(48): error: #77-D: this declaration has no storage class or type specifier libspeex\bits.c(48): error: #65: expected a ";" libspeex\bits.c(139): warning: #12-D: parsing restarts here after previous syntax error libspeex\bits.c(141): error: #77-D: this declaration

rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8 passes as much as on a GK208, and xv appears to work. Very lightly tested. Instead of sticking coordinates into pushbufs, the vertex shader is modified to read them from a constbuf, indexed by vertex id. This approach could be used for all nvc0 generations, but I didn't want to rock the boat. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Note: this