similar to: [PATCH] inspect: Get architecture of Alpine Linux from /bin/busybox.

Resolve the paths of the binaries we are looking in the guest to identify the architecture. This way we can identify also busybox-based guests such as Alpine Linux, where all the "base" binaries in /bin are symlinks to busybox. --- src/inspect-fs-unix.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs-unix.c b/src/inspect-fs-unix.c

On Tuesday 26 January 2016 15:54:46 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > All the files in /bin are links to busybox. guestfs_file_architecture > doesn't follow symlinks so it fails. Therefore check /bin/busybox > (not a symlink) to find the architecture. > --- While this patch looks okay in principle, I think it would be better to just resolve the paths we are looking for: that is, do

Hi, I am trying to build busybox for the centos-5.3,but facing issues in installing the busybox executable into the centos filesystem. Is it possible to build a busybox for a server platform (x86) with centos. Thanks and Regards, Premraj Disclaimer : This message is proprietary to Smartlink Network Systems Limited and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: b9e114cf2ee8faa6b61807170c49720e busybox-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm 62c881a1bae28333e19dbffa2a4fed45 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 703b27bf88b2312b4c54f5c53070aa6b busybox-1.2.0-9.el5.i386.rpm 2a9d424a1bd0b5ee7b70b9969ca17769 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-9.el5.i386.rpm Source:

Hello what is the difference between busybox and klibc? Say, I want to use an initramfs in order to mount root over nfs, I can choose to use klibc with ipconfig and nfsmount? But I can also choose to use busybox with ifconfig and mount. So what's the difference, and why and in which case one is preferable to the other? If it's a FAQ, I'm sorry, just give me the link Thanks

These patches have been pushed (f5a065aa3a9c..9075f68ffc8b); I'm posting them for visibility. Laszlo Laszlo Ersek (3): lib/test-fork-safe-execvpe.sh: generalize "run" to "run0" lib/test-fork-safe-execvpe.sh: cope with Alpine Linux / BusyBox limitations Revert "ci: skip "lib/test-fork-safe-execvpe.sh" on Alpine Linux" ci/skipped_tests

Hi All, does anyone here know where to get the source rpms for these two packages? anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos I have found the anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS but not the others, is there a reason for this? regards Chad Pinnacle Technology Holdings E-Mail Disclaimer:

When I say busybox it''s actually VMware ESX server which seems to use busybox (which I guess is the case a number of other software appliances) . Reason for wanting to install puppet is to run the cli tools to create nightly vmware snapshots. I''m happy to give it a go (and add the docs to the wiki) but I''m not too sure at this stage how big a task this might be and what,

This adds package arch inspection for deb-based systems. The patch returns package arch as given by dpkg, which means that it returns 'amd64' instead of 'x86_64', for example. Whether or not we should standardize this to match rpm output is up for debate. I see other places such as guestfs_file_architecture that use the rpm-style arch. I can understand though where a user of

If libmagic isn't installed then the guestfs_file_architecture API doesn't work. This means that inspection will always return <arch>unknown</arch> for every guest. This subtly breaks a few features. In particular it was reported that the virt-builder/virt-customize --install option did not work because the "unknown" architecture of the guest was not compatible

Patch extracts MSB/LSB info from /bin/file output and passes it as separate parameret from elf_arch. Then it is sent to impl_file_architecture and checked/ Modified magic_for_file to handle regex changes. Now with tests for file_architecture. Fixes: RHBZ#1211996 Maros Zatko (2): inspector: recognize ppc64 and ppc64le archs (RHBZ#1211996) tests: ppc64 and ppc64le for file_architecture

Patch extracts MSB/LSB info from /bin/file output and passes it as separate parameret from elf_arch. Then it is sent to impl_file_architecture and checked/ Modified magic_for_file to handle regex changes. Now with tests for file_architecture, and error reporting for unknown endianness. Fixes: RHBZ#1211996 Maros Zatko (1): inspector: recognize ppc64 and ppc64le archs (RHBZ#1211996)

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2478 Bug ID: 2478 Summary: Escape sequences (starting with ~) don't work when remote shell is BusyBox ash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0026 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0026.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: dca4151ada0126d7a2995cd930f674ff58303c19a70d6644c1f07eaee3e16a08 busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0810 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0810.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a0d9ecd33900791bf3c5395ebe3e80fabacddb28d41fc967955e2aa6eb1b22c4 busybox-1.15.1-15.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1165 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1165.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5cd60c4b0f49064e475e7600805b0b013ef08fc0037941b2bcc2d2fe76c36e59 busybox-1.15.1-16.el6_4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0244 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0244.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8a65b7fef64f6cf48889b896f6a47c0ed4503b0ec7aeed2b2515972ededcd1b7 busybox-1.15.1-21.el6_6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0244 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0244.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/busybox-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/busybox-anaconda-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/busybox-1.00.rc1-7.el4.s390x.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0815 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0815.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 54a81e3f18521316144e0d2b67729b9d busybox-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm 6fca513b911c5fdfe4d5a2fafe1b4290 busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-10.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm