similar to: Virt-v2v Import Issue

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:34 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:28 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:16 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message-----

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:16 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Nagaraju > > Mekala via llvm-dev > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 6:04 AM > > To: jh7370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk > > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List

Other suggestions 1/ Write a separate MI pass to split the macro MI which was generated earlier as a result of ISel to multiple MIs. 2/ Take the decision of splitting later in the pipeling during MC lowering. Decision about when you need to split should be driven by your intent to do any further processing over constituent instruction. ~ Jatin On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Jatin Bhateja

Hi James, Thanks for reply. When I looked in to the generated debug dump from the object file I found that DW_AT_name is always (indirect string, offset: 0x0): clang version 8.0.1, instead of variable names. Below is a sample output of the debug dump. Compilation Unit @ offset 0x0: Length: 0x6a (32-bit) Version: 4 Abbrev Offset: 0x0 Pointer Size: 4

Hi Nagaraju, Few suggestions split this into following steps. 1/ DAG Legalization : Custom lower the instruction (branch in your case) appropriately in legalization to target specific DAG nodes and glue the nodes together which you want scheduler should schedule together. 2/ Instruction Selection : Define patterns to match the custom DAG nodes. Thus actual decision of creating multiple

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:11 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, not sure - you mention the linker produces errors, but the errors you showed looked like objdump errors? Were those errors from trying to dump the linked executable, and not errors that were produced by the linker itself? Yes, as mentioned earlier I was able to generate final executable but it

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 2 Mar 2018, at 11:09, Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I am working on a target which requires to generated two >> instructions for a single branch instruction. >> ex: >> imm 1 >> br r4,0xabcd >> branch

Hi Florian, Thanks for the reply. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Florian Hahn <florian.hahn at arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/12/2017 06:24, Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am new to LLVM. Currently working on adding an embedded target to >> LLVM backend. >> I was able to generate the object file for our

Hi All, I am working on a target which requires to generated two instructions for a single branch instruction. ex: imm 1 br r4,0xabcd branch address is 0x1abcd, imm has the upper 16 bits and br has lower 16 bits. Can anyone let me know how to write these kind of patterns in the InstrInfo.td file. Thanks in Advance, Nagaraju

On 2 Mar 2018, at 11:45, Nagaraju Mekala <nagaraju.mekala87 at gmail.com> wrote: > > yes they are dependent if the branch immediate value is > 0xffff then > the imm instruction should generate other wise only "br" instruction > is enough. This sounds as if you have two br instructions, one that takes an immediate and one that takes a register and requires that

On Saturday, April 18, 2020, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 3:02 AM Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to >> generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. >>

Hi all, I am new to LLVM. Currently working on adding an embedded target to LLVM backend. I was able to generate the object file for our target using LLVM and Clang framework. The generated object file doesn't contain any debug symbols in it. I tried searching documents related to this on web but couldn't find any. Can anyone please point some links/documents on generation of

On 2 Mar 2018, at 11:09, Nagaraju Mekala via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I am working on a target which requires to generated two > instructions for a single branch instruction. > ex: > imm 1 > br r4,0xabcd > branch address is 0x1abcd, imm has the upper 16 bits and br has > lower 16 bits. > > Can anyone let me know how to write

Hello All, I was trying to add Microblaze target to LLVM backend. I was able to generate object file with relocations. and debug symbols. When I try to link this object file with microblaze GCC linker I am getting below errors and debug symbols are missing in it. mb-objdump: DWARF error: found dwarf version '15877', this reader only handles version 2, 3, 4 and 5 information

Here's the procedure: # qemu-img -f qcow2 /vm/win2k3.img 8G # virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n win2k3 -r 512 --vcpus=1 -c /home/temp/win2003sp2ins.iso -f /vm/win2k3.img -s 4 --network=bridge:br0 --mac=00:ff:ff:ff:58:58 --noautoconsole --vnc --os-type=windows --os-variant=win2k3 --hvm --accelerate And I get error as below: Starting install... internal error unable to start guest: qemu:

Hi, for the last two weeks ive been trying, to authenticate against a samba-domain using a win2k3-server. the server joined the domain without any problem and the basic login seems to work. but if i try to execute programs from mapped network drive (mapped using a domain-logon-skript), it fails with a message telling me, that i dont have sufficient rights to do so. the share has a forced user

I've been trying to setup Samba to authenticate users against accounts existing on a Windows 2003 Server without any backwards capability. Ideally, this needs to be done without any changes to the Windows 2003 Server. Users will not be logging into the Samba shares at all. This is merely for authentication. I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-Relase #4 with Samba 3.0.8. This is my smb.conf file:

I'm trying to configure a samba server in a Win2K3 domain as a dfs host. The dfs host part is working: from a win client I can map the dfs root on the samba server (on FC3 fwiw) and see the link I've created to a share on a Win2k3 active directory domain controller. From samba server, I can smbclient to the share on the Win2k3 DC, and can mount the share as "-t cifs" (but not

>From a discussion on samba technical about the inability to have Samba work as a DC when the original DC is a Windows Server 2000 machine. > > as Andrew asked you previously, the main question is : do you have some > > specific requirements for keeping a DC on that computer (eg. Exchange or > > whatever)? > > > > If you don't need to keep the DC role on

Hi people. I have 2 domains right now: WinNT4 + Windows 2k3. A lot of u will say, why don't u just move everything to win2k3?.. well I prefer to work with linux/Unix. My question is this, I test the migration from NT4 to linux with ldap, it works and is not to difficult, my problem is this: All my printers are in the server running windows 2k3 my AD server, the NT4 users can access