similar to: Hierarchical local mount

On 11/06/2015 05:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:16:21PM +0300, Maxim Perevedentsev wrote: >> Hello everyone! >> >> I have to implement the functionality of mounting all VM disks/partitions. >> >> E.g. if a VM has 2 disks of 2 partitions each (I get it from >> virt-filesystems), I want to get the following structure on host

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:16:21PM +0300, Maxim Perevedentsev wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I have to implement the functionality of mounting all VM disks/partitions. > > E.g. if a VM has 2 disks of 2 partitions each (I get it from > virt-filesystems), I want to get the following structure on host > node after mount: > mnt/ > ------hdd0/ > -------------volume1/ >

Hello all, We're having problems with files that suddenly stop being seen on the fuse clients. I couldn't yet find a way to reproduce this. It happens every once in a while. Sometimes you try to ls some file and it can't be found. When you run ls on the parent directory, it is shown on the output, and, after that, you can access it. I'm mentioning ls, but the problem also

Hello everyone! I'm playing with guestunmount and got the following issues: 1) guestunmount never returns 3 (not mounted) - i guess it's a bug at guestunmount.c:223 2) I don't know whether it's a bug in guestunmount or fusermount, but on my machine while executing > guestmount > guestunmount > guestunmount on second "guestunmount" I get

On 11/23/2015 07:59 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 23 November 2015 18:29:50 Maxim Perevedentsev wrote: >> 1) guestunmount never returns 3 (not mounted) - i guess it's a bug at >> guestunmount.c:223 > Indeed, thanks for the notice -- just send a patch for it. > >> 2) I don't know whether it's a bug in guestunmount or fusermount, but on

Greetings- Is it possible to mount multiple block devices (or network devices over NFS/CIFS) such that the contents of the mounts appear in one location? For example, lets say I have these shares available: \\server1\volume1\ \\server1\volume2\ \\server1\volume3\ All three contain a directory called data, with different subdirectories. Typically, these would be mounted like so: mount

Exit with 3 as return value when fusermount fails, because the specified mount point is not considered mounted for the user. This is in line with what the guestunmount documentation says. Adapt the test-guestunmount-fd test to the updated return value. Thanks to: Maxim Perevedentsev. --- fuse/guestunmount.c | 2 +- fuse/test-guestunmount-fd.c | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 5

Since the first patch: - The program is now called 'guestunmount'. - I tested the --fd option and it appears to work. - You can now control retries / quiet. - Revised man pages. - Includes tests. I'm just running through the automated tests now. Rich.

Dear, I have problems with installing R-1.7.1 for Redhat 9. When I applied `./configure' and `make', I get the following error: make check make[1]: Entering directory `/volume1/scratch/jallemee/R-1.7.1/tests' make[2]: Entering directory `/volume1/scratch/jallemee/R-1.7.1/tests' make[3]: Entering directory `/volume1/scratch/jallemee/R-1.7.1/tests/Examples' make[4]: Entering

Computer A runs my samba server. Has unix extensions = off, wide links = on (don't think this one matters with unix extensions off...) This way, if I have a symlink on my shares, clients see it as a normal file, not as a symlink. This works fine, even for symlinks to files outside the shares paths. Except when the symlink points to a file that is on a CIFS mount. So say I have computer B

Hey guys, i tried to create a simple rsync script that should create daily backups from a ZFS storage and put them into a timestamp folder. After creating the initial full backup, the following backups should only contain "new data" and the rest will be referenced via hardlinks (-link-dest) This was at least a simple enough scenario to achieve it with my pathetic scripting skills.

I have a server and just finished building my raids. One of the partitions is supposed to house my home folders which I then want to share with my windows computers. Before I begin migration of all my data I created a user to test if I can move my home folders from /home/<user>over to the path /mnt/volume1/homes/<user>. The move worked without problems through usermod -m -d

Hi I'm running into a rather strange and frustrating bug and wondering if anyone on the mailing list might have some insight about what might be causing it. I'm running a cluster of two dozen nodes, where the processing nodes are also the gluster bricks (using the SLURM resource manager). Each node has the glusters mounted natively (not NFS). All nodes are using v3.2.7. Each job in the

Hi, small series with small improvements to the tests. Pino Toscano (3): tests: specify the image format when possible tests: remove remaining relative paths to binaries fish: generate test-prep.sh with generator .gitignore | 1 + align/test-virt-alignment-scan.sh | 2 +- cat/Makefile.am | 2 +- cat/test-virt-cat.sh

This implements most of RHBZ#1367738. I didn't bother with virt-v2v-copy-to-local and virt-win-reg, but all the other tools now have full bash completion. Rich.

Hi, I have a problem that was already discused in the german archlinux forum and couldn't be solved. Because of this I was asked to use the rsync mailing list. So here I am ;b I'm using the following script to backup my data to a Network Attached Storage that has an ext3 formated hdd that is mounted via NFS script: http://pastebin.com/f6b7115c9 This script works fine for /home but

On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:08:38PM +0100, Pierre Riteau wrote: > For a project of mine I would like to create VMs from tarballs of > root filesystems. I would like to use libguestfs since this is > exactly what the tar2vm.sh guestfish recipe does. > > However, I need to extract tarballs that are in the hundreds of > megabytes, but my tests showed that performance is very low,

hi there, I'm following these documentations to add a file-based disk volume to a KVM guest under Centos 6.0 : http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/chap-Virtualization-Storage_Volumes.html as instructed, I created a "pool" then a "volume", file-based, e.g : mkdir /mnt/raid/kvm_pool1 virsh # pool-define-as pool1 dir - - - -

Hi, So this is a bit odd case. I have created 2 servers nodes (running CentOS 7.3) >From Client machine (CentOS 7.2) I mount to one of the nodes using: [root at CentOS7286-64 mnt]# mount -t nfs L137B-GlusterFS-Node1.L137B-root.com:/volume1 /mnt/glustervianfs/ When i created (touch) a file over the NFS: >From Client Machine: [revivo at CentOS7286-64 glustervianfs]$ touch nfs3file [revivo at

Hello, I''m looking for info on adding a disk to my current zfs pool. I am running OpenSoarlis snv_98. I have upgraded my pool since my image-update. When I installed OpenSolaris it was a machine with 2 hard disks (regular IDE). Is it possible to add the second hard disk to the pool to increase my storage capacity without a raid controller? >From what I''ve found, the