similar to: RFE: 'fstrim' minimum block size when sparsifying qcow2 should be 64K

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "RFE: 'fstrim' minimum block size when sparsifying qcow2 should be 64K"

2015 Nov 24
2
Any risk in sparsifying a base image (that has a snapshot on top of it)
Assuming the VM is not running, and we have a base (raw, sparse) with a snapshot (qcow2) on top of it. Is there any issue with running virt-sparsify on the base image? I assume deleted blocks in the base can be sparsified, since they are either still deleted on the snap (which is fine) or were written in the snap (which is fine either and does not change or matter for the base image). Can I assume
2015 Nov 04
3
Re: Fwd: [Bug 1277705] virt-sparsify --in-place should not sparsify a snapshot
[Let's discuss this upstream] On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:18:48PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > I'm missing something here - what will happen to the tree structure? > Will we lose it? So essentially it performs a merge? In copying mode: virt-sparsify disk1 disk2 creates an overlay on top of disk1, writes zeroes to the overlay in the parts of disk1 which are not used (disk1 is not
2017 Nov 23
3
Re: failure to virt-sysprep (FC27?)
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:43:54PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > Since I upgrading to FC27, I *sometimes* fail to virt-sysprep. > > The debug messages: > > libguestfs: trace: set_verbose true > > libguestfs: trace: set_verbose = 0 > > libguestfs: create: flags = 0, handle =
2015 Nov 04
1
Re: Fwd: [Bug 1277705] virt-sparsify --in-place should not sparsify a snapshot
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > [Let's discuss this upstream] > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:18:48PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > I'm missing something here - what will happen to the tree structure? > > Will we lose it? So essentially it performs a merge? > > In copying mode: > > virt-sparsify disk1
2017 Nov 23
1
Re: failure to virt-sysprep (FC27?)
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:43:54PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > Since I upgrading to FC27, I
2017 Dec 12
4
Re: failure to virt-sysprep (FC27?)
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:05:32PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:43:54PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > Since I upgrading to FC27, I *sometimes* fail to
2016 May 17
2
Re: Can I specify qcow2 preallocation method with virt-builder?
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:41:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:15:57PM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > When creating qcow2 images using virt-builder, is there a way to specify > > the qcow2 preallocation, as possible with qemu-img create -o > > preallocation=metada , for example? > > No .. but .. it does default to preallocation=metadata
2016 May 17
2
Re: Can I specify qcow2 preallocation method with virt-builder?
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:53:31PM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:41:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:15:57PM +0300, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > When creating qcow2 images using virt-builder, is there a way to
2018 Sep 21
2
[PATCH v2] sparsify: Fix test-virt-sparsify-in-place-fstrim-unsupported.sh
This addresses the feedback on v1 here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-September/msg00023.html Rich.
2018 Sep 05
2
[PATCH] sparsify: Fix test-virt-sparsify-in-place-fstrim-unsupported.sh
Since Linux commit f663b5b38fff trimming vfat is now supported by Linux. This broke the test which assumed it was not supported. Use another filesystem (minix) which does not support trimming instead. Thanks: Daniel P. Berrangé and Pino Toscano. --- ...virt-sparsify-in-place-fstrim-unsupported.sh | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git
2016 May 17
2
Can I specify qcow2 preallocation method with virt-builder?
When creating qcow2 images using virt-builder, is there a way to specify the qcow2 preallocation, as possible with qemu-img create -o preallocation=metada , for example? TIA, Y.
2017 Nov 21
2
failure to virt-sysprep (FC27?)
Since I upgrading to FC27, I *sometimes* fail to virt-sysprep. The debug messages: libguestfs: trace: set_verbose true libguestfs: trace: set_verbose = 0 libguestfs: create: flags = 0, handle = 0x7f4600005dd0, program = python2 libguestfs: trace: set_program "lago" libguestfs: trace: set_program = 0 libguestfs: trace: add_drive_ro
2018 Feb 06
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Slow conversion from VMware in 4.1
On Feb 6, 2018 11:06 AM, "Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto" < lorenzetto.luca@gmail.com> wrote: On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v.1.html#vmware-vcenter-resources > > You should be able to run multiple conversions in parallel > to improve throughput. > > The only long-term
2015 Nov 24
0
Re: Any risk in sparsifying a base image (that has a snapshot on top of it)
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Assuming the VM is not running, and we have a base (raw, sparse) with a > snapshot (qcow2) on top of it. > Is there any issue with running virt-sparsify on the base image? I assume > deleted blocks in the base can be sparsified, since they are either still > deleted on the snap (which is fine) or were written in the snap
2015 Nov 04
1
[PATCH] sparsify: in-place: Refuse to run on overlay files (RHBZ#1277705).
$ qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b /tmp/centos-6.img overlay.qcow2 $ virt-sparsify --in-place overlay.qcow2 virt-sparsify: error: disk image 'overlay.qcow2' appears to have a backing file. You should use copying mode sparsification for this file (see the virt-sparsify(1) manual). Thanks: Yaniv Kaul --- sparsify/in_place.ml | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git
2017 Dec 24
2
Re: virt-copy-in - how do I get the selinux relabeling done for the file?
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 02:15:44PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > I'm copying a file into a VM using virt-copy-in - which is great, but the > > file is wrongly labeled. > > How can I fix that? > > Hi Yaniv, > > The easiest thing is to run this after doing the virt-copy-in:
2016 Aug 05
6
[PATCH 0/4] sparsify: Warn instead of error if a filesystem cannot be fstrimmed.
Fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364347
2018 Feb 06
1
Re: [ovirt-users] Slow conversion from VMware in 4.1
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:11:37AM +0100, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto wrote: > Il 6 feb 2018 10:52 AM, "Yaniv Kaul" <ykaul@redhat.com> ha scritto: > > > I assume its network interfaces are also a bottleneck as well. Certainly if > they are 1g. > Y. > > > That's not the case, vcenter uses 10g and also all the involved hosts. > > We
2017 Dec 24
3
virt-copy-in - how do I get the selinux relabeling done for the file?
I'm copying a file into a VM using virt-copy-in - which is great, but the file is wrongly labeled. How can I fix that? TIA, Y.
2016 Aug 12
4
[PATCH 1/2] v2v: Make fstrim warning clearer (RHBZ#1366456).
This reverts the change made for RHBZ#1168144. The warning is now always displayed. It would be nice to make the warning actionable, but there is not a lot that end users can do since fstrim is such a complex topic interacting with all filesystem and storage layers. --- v2v/v2v.ml | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/v2v.ml b/v2v/v2v.ml index