similar to: [PATCH] customize: fix running commands on the same architecture

v2: Fix problem when running multiple commands.

Add an helper function to run a command in the guest, checking for the host/guest compatibility. This is mostly extracted from the internal do_run helper currently in the Customize_run module of virt-customize. --- mltools/tools_utils.ml | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mltools/tools_utils.mli | 10 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) diff --git a/mltools/tools_utils.ml

When running (eg) dnf on a 32 bit i686 guest when the host is 64 bit x86_64, dnf believes it is running on a 64 bit machine and so tries to install x86_64 packages. We can 'trick' dnf into believing it's a 32 bit machine using the setarch program. $ virt-builder fedora-22 --arch i686 --install 'gperf' ... [ 27.4] Installing packages: gperf ... Running transaction test Error:

This patch series adds a new virt-sysprep operation to offline unenroll a guest from FreeIPA. It does so by removing some configuration files and certificates. It requires a change in libguestfs-common before the series is applied. Pino Toscano (4): customize: port do_run to run_in_guest_command sysprep: add a update_system_ca_store side effect sysprep: ca-certificates: request system CA

> Okay, thanks. I really don't need _EXACT_ match, but close. Again, my > aim is to equip GlibC with some logging facilities IF anyone is using the > gethostbyname(). Given the help from this list, I was able to rebuild > GlibC for CentOS and am testing my stuff now. > > I appreciate your help on this matter. Not knowing where the knobs are was > the hardest part. I

Just refactoring. Rich.

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > > > > You asked about link time. Now it sounds like you're talking

On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 6:02 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Glibc sources? > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:47 PM, ANDY KENNEDY <ANDY.KENNEDY at adtran.com> wrote: > >> > > How do I tell rpmbuild to

Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". Another question: if asan would require -no_pie on Mac, will this be a serious limitation? Thanks, --kcc On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com>wrote: > Options when creating a main executable > -pie This

On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > Yes, we have no ASRL with -no_pie. > Can we disable ASRL even with -pie? > On linux we can do it with "setarch x86_64 -R". > You asked about link time. Now it sounds like you're talking about runtime? > Another question: if asan would require -no_pie on Mac, will this be a serious limitation? > If asan

On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 10:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd.de> wrote: > Anil Singhar dixit: > > >Manual testing as provided within the package has been done with all > >tests passing. This includes the units tests available under > >usr/klibc/tests, usr/utils, usr/dash and usr/gzip. For dash and > >gzip, only sanity testing has been done. > >

Hi Neil / Thorsten, The full test result is attached. Thanks and Regards, Anil ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root at genericarmv8:~/anilss/AArch64/mksh_44-1/mksh# ./mksh test.sh -p $PWD/mksh Testing mksh for conformance: # $MirOS: src/bin/mksh/check.t,v 1.599 2013/02/24 14:22:41 tg Exp $

On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> Link time is of course better. >> But if there is a syscall (like the one used by setarch) we could call it >> and reexec. >> Using setenv("DYLD_NO_PIE")+reexec looks gross to me. > There's posix_spawnattr_setflags() that can do the job >

Without these flags --install will most likely fail as the GPG key may no be imported in the guest image. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml index 9d97522..ad0ab7f 100644 --- a/customize/customize_run.ml +++ b/customize/customize_run.ml @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ exec >>%s

Commit-ID: acd0936c5f8b4f5d94065ca46714d17e6a882cf2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=acd0936c5f8b4f5d94065ca46714d17e6a882cf2 Author: Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt.nl> AuthorDate: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 08:37:11 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] parser: use pgetc_eatbnl()

Commit-ID: a4659bfa776f24f790c3ec071c5c9ef9459cdb70 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=a4659bfa776f24f790c3ec071c5c9ef9459cdb70 Author: Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt.nl> AuthorDate: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 08:37:11 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: parser: use

Hi list, after a bit of struggling I found out how to cleanly install rkhunter ... maybe this is useful for you: * Download rkhunter (I downloaded v 1.2.8) * mv /etc/rpm/platform /root/etc_rpm_platform * setarch i386 rpmbuild -ta --target=i386 rkhunter-1.2.8.tar.gz * mv /root/etc_rpm_platform /etc/rpm/platform * rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm * wget

> Link time is of course better. > But if there is a syscall (like the one used by setarch) we could call it > and reexec. > Using setenv("DYLD_NO_PIE")+reexec looks gross to me. There's posix_spawnattr_setflags() that can do the job (http://reverse.put.as/2011/08/11/how-gdb-disables-aslr-in-mac-os-x-lion/), but the necessary flag appeared only in Lion. To the best of my

I am attempting to install the Portal GT-D mud client (www.gameaxle.com) on top of wine-0.9.6-1.fc4 which I then reconfigured using winetools-0.9-3jo after failing to install MS Office XP Pro (which I never did get to work either, but I found some references saying that it wasn't likely to). IE6 installed and runs for what it is worth. I run the setup program in the style the wine tools use