similar to: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)

Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >> rpm_is_avaiable verification >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > the new version of the patch is somehow confusing.

Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the

On 04/02/2015 11:47 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2015 11:15:07 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> Hi Pino, >> >> On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>>>> Hi

Hi Daniel, On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > >> rpm_is_avaiable verification > >> in the detection (I've

On Thursday 02 April 2015 11:15:07 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > Hi Pino, > > On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26

On 04/02/2015 01:20 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > On 04/02/2015 11:47 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >> On Thursday 02 April 2015 11:15:07 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>> Hi Pino, >>> >>> On 04/02/2015 09:51 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique

Hi Daniel, On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > rpm_is_avaiable verification > in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides,

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:37:26PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > rpm_is_avaiable verification > in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > > Thanks and sorry for the confusion, Daniel, thanks - I have pushed an update which should fix everything.

Fix for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266918

Hi, this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems. Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point. Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm

Hi, I've found a problem with supermin code running in an ibm_powerkvm ppc64le distro. Output of libguestfs-test-tool: $ libguestfs-test-tool ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED * output below in your bug report. *

Hi, let's make supermin use /etc/os-release as primary source instead of the various release files in /etc; apparently distros (e.g. openSUSE) are starting removing them. Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): Add simple handling of /etc/os-release Use os-release to detect the distro src/Makefile.am | 3 +++ src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/os_release.ml | 78

This patch series fixes the way supermin sorts the list of installed packages when resolving a name, picking the right package for the host architecture. Pino Toscano (5): rpm: do not unpack parameters rpm: fix version comparison rpm: query the RPM architecture rpm: fix package sorting (RHBZ#1696822) utils: remove unused 'compare_architecture' function src/librpm-c.c | 10

Bind and use rpmvercmp to compare versions of packages when sorting them, instead of an own string-based comparison function. --- src/librpm-c.c | 12 ++++++++++++ src/librpm.ml | 1 + src/librpm.mli | 1 + src/rpm.ml | 2 +- 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c index 1ae3bad..fc847d6 100644 --- a/src/librpm-c.c +++

--- src/utils.ml | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ src/utils.mli | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/utils.ml b/src/utils.ml index 3e81c21..7ae24bd 100644 --- a/src/utils.ml +++ b/src/utils.ml @@ -204,3 +204,24 @@ let compare_architecture a1 a2 = exit 1 in compare (index_of_architecture a1) (index_of_architecture a2) + +(* Parse a size field, eg. "10G".

Or even ... cat > /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/00-directories <<EOF /opt /opt/ibm /opt/ibm/powerkvm /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/pkvm /usr/share/doc/pkvm/licenses EOF -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows

Add the package that raised the issue, so it can be used to provide better diagnostic. --- src/librpm-c.c | 15 ++++++++++----- src/librpm.ml | 4 ++-- src/librpm.mli | 2 +- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/librpm-c.c b/src/librpm-c.c index 3bd25a2..75ca4d7 100644 --- a/src/librpm-c.c +++ b/src/librpm-c.c @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ librpm_handle_closed (void) }

Hello, I tried to install guestfish on my Fedora 29 and used the commands from documentation sudo dnf install libguestfs-tools but I got an error when I tried to execute run. You will find below logs below: ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED * output

Hi, to ease debugging issues with appliances (e.g. when used in libguestfs), using --include-packagelist will add a file containing the list of all the packages used. Thanks, Pino Toscano (3): ext2: add ext2fs_chmod and ext2fs_chown chroot: factor out file copy code Add --include-packagelist src/build.ml | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ src/chroot.ml | 29

This is an attempt to make supermin check for the existing results of an output when checking whether the appliance must be rebuilt using --if-newer. At the moment it is implemented only for the build mode, and for its ext2 output format. Pino Toscano (4): build: factor ext2 filenames Tighten Unix_error check for missing outputdir Extend modes with list of outputs build: set