similar to: [Bug 1480] New: SLES15 Default Iptable rule causing issue

I need a CIFS server to provide access to Linux files to Windows clients. I am able to accomplish this on SLES12 SP5, running kernel-4.12.14, with samba 4.10.5 using the following smb.conf [global] dedicated keytab file = /etc/samba/samba.keytab domain master = No kerberos method = dedicated keytab load printers = No local master = No ntlm auth =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 G'day The attached patch adds "first draft" support for service location protocol, using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you to automagically discover all the rsync servers on your network (which is defined in terms of your SLP configuration - typically equal to multicast scope, but you can change it around with

First a heartfelt thanks for writing back. In a solution (not having this issue) we do use nfs-ganesha to host filesystem squashfs root FS objects to compute nodes. It is working great. We also have fuse-through-LIO. The solution here is 3 servers making up with cluster admin node. The XFS issue is only observed when we try to replace an existing one with another XFS on top, and only with RAW,

On 17/02/2023 22:09, Bob Green via samba wrote: > I need a CIFS server to provide access to Linux files to Windows clients. I > am able to accomplish this on SLES12 SP5, running kernel-4.12.14, with > samba 4.10.5 using the following smb.conf I am surprised this worked with Samba 4.10.x > > [global] > dedicated keytab file = /etc/samba/samba.keytab >

Hey Erik, I am running a similar setup with no issues having Ubuntu Host Systems on HPE DL380 Gen 10. I however used to run libvirt/qemu via nfs-ganesha on top of gluster flawlessly. Recently I upgraded to the native GFAPI implementation, which is poorly documented with snippets all over the internet. Although I cannot provide a direct solution for your issue, I am however suggesting to try

Hello all! We are experiencing a strange problem with QEMU virtual machines where the virtual machine image is hosted on a gluster volume. Access via fuse. (Our GFAPI attempt failed, it doesn?t seem to work properly with current QEMU/distro/gluster). We have the volume tuned for ?virt?. So we use qemu-img to create a raw image. You can use sparse or falloc with equal results. We start a virtual

I have two iptable rules for userspace modification : iptable -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 9090 -j NFQUEUE iptable -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p udp --sport 9090 -j NFQUEUE I have the following network setup: client ---------------->Linux Box or router--------------------->server. What i'm trying to achieve is modifying all packets which comes from client to 9090 port of the

Hi, Can anybody tell me how to delete DSCP or TOS setting using iptable command. iptables --list OUTPUT --table mangle Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination DSCP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:http DSCP s et 0x08 DSCP udp --

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1480 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1480.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a7cb2c16f8581d3d9f249acc0701888717ecd22df45a359517c1754e34b352fe thunderbird-17.0.10-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1480 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1480.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7e93a0cdf0bfb9d0cadfba028ac975b8 ftp-0.17-37.el5.i386.rpm Source: c794713224aec9097c340a9a1120b086 ftp-0.17-37.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project {

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1480 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1480.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0097ce658171d4c91b4a134e0d100212 ftp-0.17-37.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: c794713224aec9097c340a9a1120b086 ftp-0.17-37.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1480 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1480.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c04b7ca5f9b437ce36284abb8d40a9d3dcc18b20436e1c1c9239a6601bf4a66a thunderbird-17.0.10-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2017:1480 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1480.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c8c5562d6277f6546125c0b72fa632813376708c0929ed5966c6ecc1d60af267 glibc-2.12-1.209.el6_9.2.i686.rpm

i search a lot forum how to get bandwidth statistic such number of packet, total byte in each application protocol by using IPTABLES + netfilter-layer7 but i don''t know which script for getting it in log file and use data after get it for plotting graph later my IPTABLES command like this iptables -t mangle -N all iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j all iptables -t mangle -A

hi all, just wondering what everyone would think about iptables --append POSTROUTING or OUTPUT --table nat --jump rt_lookup this would ask for a new route lookup as a packet traverses the nat table (done once) and would enable the effective marking/routing of locally generated packets, as well as determining a potentially new out-interface, etc, after natting. can anyone comment on potential

I'm having some trouble with portsentry on CentOS. I've installed it and configured it to ignore my network. However, every 20 minutes, it reloads my iptables and basically kills any SSH sessions, etc. Any suggestions? Thanks, Todd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Le 16/08/2010 19:20, Rick Jones a écrit : > Klein Stéphane wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I''ve two computer : >> * A : it''s a server with a firewall >> * B : an computer on internet >> >> I''ve installed netserver on host A. >> I use netperf on host B. >> >> On host B, I launch : >> >> $ netperf -H

Hi, All, So far, all the applications I have seen for Iptables are focusing on connecting a WAN with one IP address to a LAN and using NAT. My question is if the iptables support multiple IP address on WAN side? If so, how it works (you only have one NIC on WAN side)? Is static NAT (it might not be the right term, I mean a static and permanent connection between WAN IP address and LAN IP address)

Hello, i try to use iptables to mark packet and then to filter them with tc. Here is my script: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.28.54.41/32 -p tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 10000kbit burst 10000kbit mtu 1500k drop flowid :1 I can not use u32 because i have several

Hi Thomas, On 03.11.2020 10:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > No reason having the same code in every architecture. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> > Cc: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org This patch landed in linux-next 20201109 as commit