similar to: [PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support"

2020 Aug 21
0
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi Mike, On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:58:13AM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > Yes, I still see the issue ? APs are offline after boot. I?ll spend > some time seeing if I can figure out what the problem is. Thanks! Tom and a few others debugged another FSGSBASE issue yesterday, which I think might also be the cause for the AP startup problems you are seeing (if you test on Rome). Can you try to
2020 Jul 30
0
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi Mike, On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:27:48AM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > Thanks for the updated patches! I applied this patch-set onto commit > 01634f2bd42e ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent??) from your tree. It boots, > but CPU 1 (on a two-CPU VM) is offline at boot, and `chcpu -e 1` returns: > > chcpu: CPU 1 enable failed: Input/output error > > with nothing in dmesg to
2020 Aug 18
0
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi Mike, On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:23:50PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > Yes, FSGSBASE was enabled. If I disable it*, this kernel boots fine, with > both CPUs online. > > *That is, by forcing guest-CPUID[7].EBX bit 0 to 0. Can you please test whether https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/linux.git/log/?h=sev-es-client-tip-5.9 still triggers this issue on your side?
2020 Aug 25
0
[PATCH v6 00/76] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi Mike, On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 12:21:03AM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > Thanks for the new update! I still see the same FSGSBASE behavior on our platform. > > That is, APs come up offline; masking out either FSGSBASE or RDPID from the > guest's CPUID results in all CPUs online. > > Is that still expected with this patch set? (As you mentioned in an earlier reply, > I?m
2020 May 06
0
[PATCH v3 64/75] x86/sev-es: Cache CPUID results for improved performance
On 5/6/20 1:08 PM, Mike Stunes wrote: > > >> On Apr 28, 2020, at 8:17 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro at 8bytes.org> wrote: >> >> From: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> >> >> To avoid a future VMEXIT for a subsequent CPUID function, cache the >> results returned by CPUID into an xarray. >> >> [tl: coding standard changes, register zero
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 64/75] x86/sev-es: Cache CPUID results for improved performance
From: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> To avoid a future VMEXIT for a subsequent CPUID function, cache the results returned by CPUID into an xarray. [tl: coding standard changes, register zero extension] Signed-off-by: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> [ jroedel at suse.de: - Wrapped cache handling into
2020 May 20
2
[PATCH v3 64/75] x86/sev-es: Cache CPUID results for improved performance
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> > > To avoid a future VMEXIT for a subsequent CPUID function, cache the > results returned by CPUID into an xarray. > > [tl: coding standard changes, register zero extension] > > Signed-off-by: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> > Signed-off-by: Tom
2020 May 20
2
[PATCH v3 64/75] x86/sev-es: Cache CPUID results for improved performance
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:14PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> > > To avoid a future VMEXIT for a subsequent CPUID function, cache the > results returned by CPUID into an xarray. > > [tl: coding standard changes, register zero extension] > > Signed-off-by: Mike Stunes <mstunes at vmware.com> > Signed-off-by: Tom
2020 Aug 22
0
[PATCH v5 00/75] x86: SEV-ES Guest Support
Hi Mike, On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 05:42:16PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > Yes, that fixes the problem ? I can see both CPUs running now. Thanks! Thanks a lot for testing, good to have this issue resolved. Regards, Joerg
2020 Jul 22
0
[PATCH v4 51/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MMIO events
Hi Mike, On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 09:01:44PM +0000, Mike Stunes wrote: > I?m running into an MMIO-related bug when I try testing this on our hypervisor. > > During boot, probe_roms (arch/x86/kernel/probe_roms.c) uses > romchecksum over the video ROM and extension ROM regions. In my test > VM, the video ROM romchecksum starts at virtual address > 0xffff8880000c0000 and has length
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 53/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MSR events
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by RDMSR/WRMSR instructions. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c |
2020 May 20
1
[PATCH v3 51/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MMIO events
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:01PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > Add handler for VC exceptions caused by MMIO intercepts. These > intercepts come along as nested page faults on pages with reserved > bits set. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to VC
2020 Jul 14
0
[PATCH v4 45/75] x86/sev-es: Adjust #VC IST Stack on entering NMI handler
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> When an NMI hits in the #VC handler entry code before it switched to another stack, any subsequent #VC exception in the NMI code-path will overwrite the interrupted #VC handlers stack. Make sure this doesn't happen by explicitly adjusting the #VC IST entry in the NMI handler for the time in can cause #VC exceptions. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 59/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MONITOR/MONITORX Events
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by MONITOR and MONITORX instructions. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> ---
2020 May 20
2
[PATCH v3 59/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MONITOR/MONITORX Events
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by MONITOR and MONITORX > instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] > Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel
2020 May 20
2
[PATCH v3 59/75] x86/sev-es: Handle MONITOR/MONITORX Events
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:17:09PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > > Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by MONITOR and MONITORX > instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> > [ jroedel at suse.de: Adapt to #VC handling infrastructure ] > Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 44/75] x86/sev-es: Allocate and Map IST stacks for #VC handler
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Allocate and map enough stacks for the #VC handler to support sufficient levels of nesting and the NMI-in-#VC scenario. Also setup the IST entrys for the #VC handler on all CPUs because #VC needs to work before cpu_init() has set up the per-cpu TSS. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_entry_area.h |
2020 Apr 28
0
[PATCH v3 42/75] x86/sev-es: Setup GHCB based boot #VC handler
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Add the infrastructure to handle #VC exceptions when the kernel runs on virtual addresses and has a GHCB mapped. This handler will be used until the runtime #VC handler takes over. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/include/asm/segment.h | 2 +- arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
2020 Jul 24
0
[PATCH v5 39/75] x86/sev-es: Print SEV-ES info into kernel log
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Refactor the message printed to the kernel log which indicates whether SEV or SME is active to print a list of enabled encryption features. This will scale better in the future when more memory encryption features might be added. Also add SEV-ES to the list of features. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> ---
2020 Jul 14
0
[PATCH v4 63/75] x86/sev-es: Handle #DB Events
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Handle #VC exceptions caused by #DB exceptions in the guest. Those must be handled outside of instrumentation_begin()/end() so that the handler will not be raised recursivly. Handle them by calling the kernels debug exception handler. Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- arch/x86/kernel/sev-es.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file