similar to: VDPA Debug/Statistics

On 2020/8/11 ??7:58, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:26:20AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Currently, the only statistics we get for a VDPA instance comes from the virtio_net device instance. Since VDPA involves hardware acceleration, there can be quite a lot of information that can be fetched from the underlying device. Currently there is no generic

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:58:23AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:26:20AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote: > > Hi All > > > > Currently, the only statistics we get for a VDPA instance comes from the virtio_net device instance. Since VDPA involves hardware acceleration, there can be quite a lot of information that can be fetched from the underlying device.

On 2020/7/20 ??3:14, Eli Cohen wrote: > Add a front end VDPA driver that registers in the VDPA bus and provides > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will

On 2020/8/5 ??12:20, Eli Cohen wrote: > Add a front end VDPA driver that registers in the VDPA bus and provides > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 05:07:59AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon at kernel.org> > > Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 1:46 AM > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> > > > > Remove exposed driver version as it was done in other drivers, so module > > version will work correctly by displaying the

On 2020/7/20 ??3:14, Eli Cohen wrote: > Modify get_vq_state() so it returns an error code. In case of hardware > acceleration, the available index may be retrieved from the device, an > operation that can possibly fail. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli at mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

On 2020/8/5 ??12:20, Eli Cohen wrote: > Modify get_vq_state() so it returns an error code. In case of hardware > acceleration, the available index may be retrieved from the device, an > operation that can possibly fail. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav at mellanox.com> > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli at mellanox.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:57:44AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:51:12AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:34:32AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:51:27PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > > > in mlx5-next branch in > > >

On 2020/8/5 ??1:01, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:29:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:20:36PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:34:33AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:26:44AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > > > Change core

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > > > block implementation will be able to use it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli

On 2020/7/28 ??2:32, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/7/28 ??2:05, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. >>> >>>

On 2020/7/28 ??2:32, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/7/28 ??2:05, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. >>> >>>

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > block implementation will be able to use it. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> Why don't we merge this patch together with the block module? > --- > V0 --> V1: > Removed "default n" for configu options

On 2020/7/16 ??3:23, Eli Cohen wrote: > Currently, get_vq_state() is used only to pass the available index value > of a vq. Extend the struct to return status on the VQ to the caller. > For now, define VQ_STATE_NOT_READY. In the future it will be extended to > include other infomration. > > Modify current vdpa driver to update this field. > > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:20:36PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. Thanks! OK so what's the plan for merging this? Do patches at least build well enough that I can push them upstream? Or do they have to go on

On 2020/7/28 ??2:05, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches submitted a couple of

On 2020/7/16 ??6:25, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:35:18PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/7/16 ??4:21, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:11:00PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2020/7/16 ??3:23, Eli Cohen wrote: >>>>> Currently, get_vq_state() is used only to pass the available index value >>>>> of a